1 / 6

Strategic Management in an E nacted World ( Linda Smircich and Charles Stubbart , 1985)

Strategic Management in an E nacted World ( Linda Smircich and Charles Stubbart , 1985). Henrik Alen Jessi Mänttäri 16.9.2014. Objective/Perceived vs. Enacted environment. Implications of the concept of enacted environment for strategic management.

Download Presentation

Strategic Management in an E nacted World ( Linda Smircich and Charles Stubbart , 1985)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strategic Management in an Enacted World (Linda Smircich and Charles Stubbart, 1985) Henrik Alen JessiMänttäri 16.9.2014

  2. Objective/Perceived vs. Enactedenvironment

  3. Implications of the concept of enacted environment for strategic management • Abandoning the prescription that organizations should adapt to their environments • Rethinking constraints, threats and opportunities • Considering the primary role of the strategic managers to be the management of meaning

  4. Managing in an Enacted World • Process of enacting a reality • Priorenactment • Thinkingand acting • Competingenactments • Self-reflection and challengingassumptions -> forgetwhatyouknow

  5. Critique • Notthatuseful in day-to-daymanaging -> valuabletool in determinig and updatingstrategy-> eventualresults of one’simpactimpossible to foresee • Role of strategicmanager -> constantquestoning • Anyenvironmentcanbeenacted -> laws, regulations, priorenactments etc. • Usefulness and generilizability of interpretativestudies?

  6. Thankyou!Questions, comments?

More Related