fiscal rules for sub central governments a norwegian perspective
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Fiscal rules for sub-central governments – a Norwegian perspective

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 14

Fiscal rules for sub-central governments – a Norwegian perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Fiscal rules for sub-central governments – a Norwegian perspective. Rune J. Sørensen Norwegian School of Management (BI), Oslo, Norway E-mail: [email protected]

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Fiscal rules for sub-central governments – a Norwegian perspective' - erika

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
fiscal rules for sub central governments a norwegian perspective

Fiscal rules for sub-central governments –a Norwegian perspective

Rune J. Sørensen

Norwegian School of Management (BI), Oslo, Norway

E-mail: [email protected]

For presentation at the second meeting of the network on fiscal relations across levels of government, OECD Headquarters, Paris 8-9 September 2005

  • Why regulate sub-central governments
  • The political ’strength’ of cental government
  • The Nordic system of local government
  • The Norwegian hospital sector
  • The allocation costs of tax regulation
a need for central regulations
A need for central regulations?
  • Common pool problems:
    • due to vertical fiscal imbalances, and
    • ’weak’ central government.
  • Intertemporal imbalances:
    • due to local borrowing and residential mobility, and
    • ’soft’ central budget constraints.
  • Imperfect voter controls
a need for central regulations cont
A need for central regulations cont.

Information problems may induce local politicians to vote for higher public spending levels :

  • Local government politicians offer voters a better service supply, while voters keep national politicians responsible for tax increases (or local deficits)
  • BUT: Central government sets minimum standards and entitlements, which must be met by local governments (”unfunded mandates”). Voters may keep local politicans responsible for tax increases
2 a strong central government
2. A ’strong’ central government?
  • Political structure of central government
    • Election systems and party fragmmentation
    • Types of parliamentary government
  • Selected empirical studies:
    • Common pool: Inman & Fitts (1990); Borge & Rattsø (2002)
    • Intertemporal imbalance: Roubini & Sachs (1989); Alesina & Perotti (1995); Inman (2003);
3 the nordic local government model
Fiscal federalism

(the standard version)

Local public goods

Residential mobility, including tax competition

Local discretion, including

Local tax financing, small central grants

Discretion with respect to tax rates

Administrative federalism

(Nordic model)

Individual welfare services

Representative democracy

Extensive central controls, including

High share of central grants

Limited tax discretion and other fiscal rules

3. The nordic local government model
Norwegian local government consumption

Forecasts in the National Budget and National Accounts1)

1990-2003 averages:

Planned growth rate: 1,6 %

Actual growth rate: 2,4 %

1)2002 is missing.

4 the norwegian hospital sector
4. The Norwegian hospital sector
  • In january 2002, Norway transferred the responsibility for the hospitals from county governments to central government
  • Did transfer of responsibility from local to central government ”solve” problems of spending control?
Production growth in the Norwegian hospital sector measured in DRG points. Source: Terje P. Hagen, University of Oslo 2005.

Central government responsibility

County responsibility

Actual growth rate

Planned growth rate

5 the allocation cost of tax regulation
5. The allocation cost of tax regulation
  • Rural municipalities:
    • They receive large central grants, partly to compensate diseconomies of scale and demographics, partly as part of regional policy.
    • The outcome is high levels of local public consumption, and very high levels of local public consumption relative to private revenues.
  • Urban municipalities:
    • They receive small central grants.
    • Local public consumption is very low relative to private revenues.
  • Does central rax regulation induce an allocation loss?
Allocation loss due to Norwegian tax regulation (Sources: Statistics Norway 2003; Questionnaries to local politicians 1995,1999,2003, N=6247; Data from various population surveys 1993-2003, N=8594)
estimates of allocation loss
Estimates of allocation loss
  • Assumptions:
    • Price elasticity: -0,4
    • Income elasticity: 0,6
  • Allocation loss (consumer surplus) based in 2003-data:1000 NOK per capita (municipal level) or about 3 percent of local government revenue

Source: Borge, L.-E. 2003. More tax autonomy for Norwegian local governments: possible implications for efficiency and service provision. Mimeo. Norwegian University of Science and Technology