1 / 27

SkiFAST

SkiFAST. Conceptual Design Review. Agenda. Introduction Specifications Conceptual Design of a Ski Bed and Force Input Functional Modeling Design Solutions Morphological Charts Full Machine Designs Evaluation Discussion. Specifications. Initial problem description:

erek
Download Presentation

SkiFAST

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SkiFAST Conceptual Design Review

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Specifications • Conceptual Design of a Ski Bed and Force Input • Functional Modeling • Design Solutions • Morphological Charts • Full Machine Designs • Evaluation • Discussion

  3. Specifications • Initial problem description: • “Ski injury research has not determined a correlation between ski edge pressures and human joint forces. SkiFAST will create a manufacturable, research-grade force analysis device to examine this relationship under varying conditions.”

  4. Project learning • Research • Experiments • Intuition • Results in a project specifications document • A “living document”

  5. Functional Modeling • A modern technique for increasing innovation • Break down larger functions into sub-functions that are easier to handle • Ski bed • Force input • “Leg” • Simplifies the design of complex solutions

  6. Ski Forces Function Diagram

  7. Design Solutions • List physical solutions to each function • Electrical pressure sensors • Hydraulic line pressure • Air pressure • Spring constant/displacement Receive Forces

  8. Ski Bed Morphological Chart

  9. Ski Bed Solution 1 – Pneumatic Rods or Tracks Tilting table for angle variation Travelers (rods or tracks) w/pneumatic or mechanical springs

  10. Ski Bed Solution 2 – Vertical Springs Ski is set in place but not restricted Individual rod banks for each edge

  11. Boot Forces Function Diagram

  12. Input Force Morphological Chart ???

  13. Input Force Solution 1 – 3 Axis “Cherry Picker” X Z 3-Axis movement similar to a CNC mill Y Pin connections allow removal

  14. Input Force Solution 2 – Component Actuators Force input via 3 separate linear actuators In-boot sensors will detect resolved point loads Computer control will compensate for static application points

  15. An integration of ski bed and force input solutions Full Machine Design

  16. Machine Design Solution 1 – Dual Piston, Component Actuators

  17. Machine Design Solution 1 – Dual Piston, Component Actuators • Pros • Cons Simple Measures forces at both ski edges Difficult to remove for human use Smaller angular degree of freedom Least “realistic”

  18. Machine Design Solution 2 – Track Table, Component Actuators

  19. Machine Design Solution 2 – Track Table, Component Actuators • Pros • Cons High angular degree of freedom Allows full flex of the ski Difficult to remove for human use Measures one ski edge

  20. Machine Design Solution 3 – Pneumatic Rods, “Cherry Picker”

  21. Machine Design Solution 3 – Pneumatic Rods, “Cherry Picker” • Pros • Cons High angular degree of freedom Allows free flex of the ski Most “realistic” force input Easy to use Most expensive Measures one ski edge

  22. Summary Pros Cons 1 • Simple • Measures force at both ski edges • Difficult to remove for human use • Limited DOF • Least “realistic” 2 • Least expensive • High DOF • Allows full ski flex • Difficult to remove for human use • Measures force at one ski edge 3 • High DOF • Allows full ski flex • Most “realistic” force input • Easy to use • Most expensive • Measures force at one ski edge

  23. Timeline

  24. Scoping • 2 degrees of freedom • Build in modularity • Build individual components • Use temporary fixtures • Farm out to future teams

  25. Thank You Dr. Seegmiller, for your support!

  26. Questions? Discussion

More Related