NGP TGaz Nov. Agenda

1. NGP TGazNov. Agenda Authors: • Date:2015-11-12 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

2. IEEE 802.11Task Group azNext Generation Positioning Dallas, Texas Nov. 8th-13th, 2015 Chair: Jonathan Segev (Intel) Vice-chair: Carlos Aldana Secretary: Zhou Lan (MediaTek) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

3. Abstract • This presentation contains the IEEE 802.11 TGaz NGP (Next Generation Positioning) agenda for the Nov. meeting. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

4. Attendance, Voting & Document Status • Make sure your badges are correct • Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot • If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising • Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area • see Jon Rosdahl – Jon.Rosdahl@csr.com • Cell Phones Silent or Off Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

5. Logistics • Attendance: • https://imat.ieee.org • You must register before logging attendance. • You must log attendance during each 2 hour session. • Documentation • http://mentor.ieee.org • Use “TGaz” folder for documents relating to the TGaz activity. • Note: • Per WG leadership guidance, attendance count at the midpoint of each timeslot will be conducted during each TG meeting slot. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

6. Patent Policy • Following 5 slides Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

7. The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation Advise the WG attendees that: The IEEE’s patent policy is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual 6.3.5 and in FAQs 14 and 15 on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation Instructions for the WG Chair

8. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. • Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2]: • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1

9. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/materials.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/index.html This slide set is available at https://development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/slideset.ppt Slide #2

10. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation Call for Potentially Essential Patents • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: • Either speak up now or • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or • Cause an LOA to be submitted Slide #3

11. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4

12. TGaz - Schedule in a Glance Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

13. Agenda Items for the Week • Patent policy • Approve previous meeting minutes (11-15/1238). • Election for TG vice chair position. • Review TG development process and documentation status • Presentations to inform the TG: • Completion of use case document development. • Initiation of Functional Requirements Document. • Schedule teleconference times as needed. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

14. Submission List for the week Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

15. Meeting Slot #1 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

16. Meeting Slot # 1 Agenda • Call Meeting to Order (1min) • Patent Policy and Logistics (5min) • Last call for Submission (0min) • Agenda Setting (4min) • Approval of previous meeting minutes (3min - Chair) • Election for TG vice chair position. • Presentation to inform TG. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

17. Submission order – Slot 1 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

18. Approval of previous meeting minutes • Document 11-15/1238r1 posted to Mentor Oct. 5th. • Motion: • To approve document 11-15/1238r1 as TG meeting minutes for the Bangkok meeting. • Moved by: Zhou Lan • Seconded by: Allan Zhu • Results (Y/N/A): • Unanimous consent Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

19. TGaz Vice-chair elections • Last call for nominations. • Close of nomination. • Presentation of nominees. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

20. TGaz Vice-chair elections • Motion • To approve Carlos Aldana (Qualcomm) as TGazvice-chair. • Moved: Allan Zhu • 2nd: Santosh Pandey • Results (Y/N/A): 30/0/1 • Motion passes Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

21. Presentations Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

22. Attendance reminder Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

23. Recess Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

24. Meeting Slot #2 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

25. Meeting Slot # 2 Agenda • Call Meeting to Order (1min) • Patent Policy and Logistics (5min) • Agenda Setting (4min) • Presentations to inform the TG (55min) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

26. Submission order – Slot 2 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

27. Motion – approve UC document Motion We adopt document 11-15-0388r2 as our baseline draft for use case document. Move: Santosh Pandey 2nd: Allan Zhu Y: 15 N: 0 A: 5 Motion passes. Jonathan Segev (Intel)

28. Review TGaz Timeline progress 2015 2016 2018 2020 2017 2019 PAR Approved (Sep. 2015) We are here NGP SG Launch (Jan. 2015) TG formation meeting (Sep. 2015) .11azDraft 1.0(Sep. 2017) .11azDraft 2.0(Mar 2018) .11az Final (Mar.. 2020) Amendment text FRD UCD 11az SFD Spec Frame work (May 16 – Mar. 17) UC doc. (May 15 – Nov. 17) Amendment text (Mar 17 – Mar. 20) Func. Req. Doc. (Nov 15 - May 16) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

29. Goals for the Jan. meeting • Initiate the Functional Requirement Document development. • Technical presentations. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

30. Teleconference Schedule • Dec. 2nd10:00 ET for 1hr. • Do we need anymore calls? Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

31. Xun Yang, Huawei Motion To instruct the use case document editor to add use cases depicted by slide 6 of submission 11-15-1436r1 to the use case working draft document. Move: Xun Yang 2nd: Allan Zhu Y: N: A:

32. Submission 1436 • Motion • Motion to table motion on slide 31 of this deck until Thursday PM1 session. • Move: Santosh Pandey • 2nd: Allan Zhu • Y: 10 N: 0 A: 3 • Motion passes. Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

33. Reminder to do attendance Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

34. Recess Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

35. Meeting Slot # 3Agenda • Call Meeting to Order (1min) • Patent Policy and Logistics (5min) • Agenda Setting (4min) • Tabled motion from 2nd slot of the week (25min). Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

36. Submission order – Slot #3 Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

37. Xun Yang, Huawei Motion#5 (tabled) To instruct the use case document editor to add use cases depicted by slide 6 of submission 11-15-1436r1 to the use case working draft document. Move: Xun Yang 2nd: Allan Zhu Y: N: A:

38. AOB? Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

39. Attendance remainder Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

40. Adjourned Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

41. Backup Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

42. References Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

43. Some history Jonathan Segev (Intel)

44. Historical performance data Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

45. Study Group Timeline - modified Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

46. Timelines 2015 2016 2018 2020 2017 2019 PAR Approved (Sep. 2015) We are here NGP SG Launch (Jan. 2015) TG formation meeting (Sep. 2015) .11azDraft 1.0(Sep. 2017) .11axDraft 2.0(Mar 2017) .11az Final Amendment text FRD UCD 11az SFD Spec Frame work (May 16 – Mac. 17) UC doc. (May 15 – Nov. 17) Spec Frame work (Mar 17 – Jan. 19) Func. Req. Doc. (Nov 15 - May 16) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

47. 2015 2016 2018 2020 2017 2019 PAR Approved (Sep. 2015) We are here NGP SG Launch (Jan. 2015) TG formation meeting (Sep. 2015) .11azDraft 1.0(Sep. 2017) .11axDraft 2.0(Mar 2017) .11az Final FRD UCD 11az SFD Amendment text Functional Req. Document (Nov 15 - May 16) Spec Frame work (Mar 17 – Jan. 19) Spec Frame work (May 16 – Mac. 17) Jonathan Segev, Intel Corporation

48. Motions and strawpolls as needed Motion/strawpoll To instruct the use case document editor to add use cases depicted by slides x y z of submission abc to the use case working draft document. Move: 2nd: Y: N: A: Jonathan Segev (Intel)

49. Strawpoll#1 We support the addition of use cases depicted by slides a,b,c of submission 11-15/XYZrN to the use case working draft document. Y: N: A: Jonathan Segev (Intel)

50. Motions on submission xxx Motion To instruct the use case document editor to add use cases depicted by slides a,b of submission 11-15/XYZrN to the use case working draft document. Move: 2nd: Y: N: A: Jonathan Segev (Intel)