1 / 9

WHY MOST AMERICANS DO NOT OWE FEDERAL INCOME TAXES – PART 1 OF 2

The “income” tax is and always has been an excise on gains from certain federally-connected activities in which most Americans do not engage at all. In fact the tax code is only applicable to a very select few, because as noted above, the territorial restrictions of the US Congress prevent that.<br>

Download Presentation

WHY MOST AMERICANS DO NOT OWE FEDERAL INCOME TAXES – PART 1 OF 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WHY MOST AMERICANS DO NOT OWE FEDERAL INCOME TAXES – PART 1 OF 2

  2. The “income” tax is and always has been an excise on gains from certain federally-connected activities in which most Americans do not engage at all. In fact the tax code is only applicable to a very select few, because as noted above, the territorial restrictions of the US Congress prevent that. Congress could have easily provided wording in the tax code stating: “All Americans are required to pay the federal income tax irrespective of where or what type you work you perform.” No such language like this exists in the tax code and for good reason – U.S. laws are enforceable only in D.C. and other U.S. territories; and the federal income tax is NOT applicable to all American people..

  3. This is no secret and the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld this principle over and over again. The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled “…legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States…” They also ruled that while the federal tax may have a uniform application across the country, the language of the code determines its ultimate applicability.

  4. In dealing with the meaning and application of an act of Congress enacted… under the Constitution to tax income…, in the absence of language evidencing a different purpose, should be interpreted “so as to give a uniform application to a nationwide scheme of taxation. Lyeth v. Hoey (1938) Therefore, a look at and understanding of the “language” of certain key terms and phrases used in the code is in order to determine its authoritative limitations.

  5. With that in mind let’s examine the several terms in the tax code: 26 U.S. Code § 3401 – Definitions (a) Wages – For purposes of this chapter, the term “wages” means all remuneration for services performed by an employee for his employer… The definition of “employee” is just a little farther down in section 3401, to wit: (c) Employee – For purposes of this chapter, the term “employee” includes an officer, employee, or elected official of the United States,

  6. a State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term “employee” also includes an officer of a corporation. (26) Trade or business – The term “trade or business” includes the performance of the functions of a public office.” Because the common meanings of words are not used in the tax code, to properly comprehend the tax code one must have a firm understanding of how the Supreme Court interprets the language in a statute:

  7. “It is axiomatic that the statutory definition of the term excludes unstated meanings of that term.” Of course, statutory definitions of terms used therein prevail over colloquial meanings. Even the Treasury Department has helpfully expressed this in its regulatory language, currently found in 27 CFR 26.11 and 27 CFR 72.11 and previously was published in 26 CFR 170.59, to wit: “Meanings of Terms: the terms “includes and including” do not exclude things not enumerated which are in the same general class.” What does this all mean?

  8. I will go into this further in my next newsletter… In the mean time if you want to learn more about how to lawfully reduce your tax bill to the lowest amount allowable by law, then go to this website: https://weexitthematrix.wordpress.com/

  9. End Taxes 4 Ever offer professional tax service to our clients to ensure they are only paying the amount of taxes owed and remaining in full compliance with both State and Federal income tax laws. Our tax experts have discovered that nearly all Americans are not just overpaying on income taxes, but in the vast majority of cases they lawfully required to very little if anything at all. We guide individuals in how to legally stop paying taxes, remain in full compliance with the income tax law and getting the biggest tax refund that the law allows. Do you want to know which tax company gives the biggest refund, contact us now by visiting our website - https://endtaxes4ever.com/.

More Related