slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
HVAC Air Filtration Overview and Life Cycle Cost Case Study Garry Pangborn March 8, 2012

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 24

HVAC Air Filtration Overview and Life Cycle Cost Case Study Garry Pangborn March 8, 2012 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 113 Views
  • Uploaded on

HVAC Air Filtration Overview and Life Cycle Cost Case Study Garry Pangborn March 8, 2012 Freudenberg Filtration Technologies. The Air We Breath - Sizes of Common Particles. The Air We Breathe - Particle Size Distribution of Atmospheric Air.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'HVAC Air Filtration Overview and Life Cycle Cost Case Study Garry Pangborn March 8, 2012' - emlyn


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
HVAC Air Filtration

Overview and Life Cycle Cost Case Study

Garry Pangborn

March 8, 2012

Freudenberg Filtration Technologies

slide3

The Air We Breathe - Particle Size Distribution of Atmospheric Air

  • The activities of modern society have greatly increased presence of sub-micron particles

Primarily Naturally-Occurring

Primarily Man-made

Fine

slide4

The Air We Breathe – Health & Wellness Considerations

  • Every day, the typical adult in the U.S.:
    • Eats 3 lbs of food
    • Drinks 4 lbs of fluids
    • Breathes 35 lbs of air!
  • Particles are deposited into respiratory tract; the smaller the particle, the deeper it can reach
  • EPA estimates that people spend 90% of time indoors
  • Sick Building Syndrome, Building Related Illness, Pandemics
  • Productivity benefits of improved IAQ (Indoor Air Quality)
  • Increases in allergy and asthma cases nationwide
  • Increasing evidence that disease can spread via airborne routes (droplet nuclei)
slide5

The Air We Breathe – Dust Concentrations

  • What is the dust concentration in this room?
    • 10 to 50 μg/m3
  • What is it in the extremes in the world?
    • Lowest recorded – Antarctica at 0.00001 μg/m3
    • Highest recorded – Sandstorms at 4,000 to 6,000 μg/m3
  • What is Urban Typical?
    • In the United States – 20 to 50 μg/m3
    • In China – 300 to 500 μg/m3
slide6

Air Filtration Mechanisms

Electrostatic Attraction

Inertial Impaction

(-)

(+)

Filter

Fiber

Brownian Diffusion

Interception

filter efficiency filtration mechanisms working together
Filter Efficiency - Filtration Mechanisms Working Together
  • Filter Efficiency is the combination of the various capture schemes
    • Sieving
    • Inertial impaction
    • Interception
    • Diffusion
    • Electrostatic attraction
slide8

Filtration Efficiency - What is MERV?

Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV)

  • ASHRAE 52.2 standard
  • Classification system for filters based upon particle capture efficiency
  • Numerical designation between 1 and 16

ASHRAE 52.2 MERV Table

LEED Point for

MERV Level ≥13

slide9

Filter Pressure Drop and Energy

  • Energy consumption impact: Up to 30% of fan energy usage due to filter pressure drop

Governing equation for how lower ΔP equates to lower energy usage:

Q x

ΔP

x t

Energy

=

η

where…

Q = volumetric flow rate

ΔP = pressure drop

t = time

η = motor-fan efficiency

Target operating zone.

slide10

Filter Pressure Drop and Energy

Optimum Filter Change-out Timing

Goal should be to change-out filters at the lowest point on this curve.

slide11

Filter Selection Criteria

  • Life cycle costs most important
    • Note difference in values between LCC and Initial Cost
  • Avoidance of catastrophic failures due to blowout or moisture are noteworthy
  • Fit and MERV naturally a key criteria
  • Vendor knowledge / service is valued
slide13

A Case Study in Energy and Life Cycle Cost Savings

Case Study Background

  • Interest in energy savings and sustainability
  • Business and Aerospace Building, 3rd Floor
  • Pursued side-by-side energy consumption comparison study

Business & Aerospace Bldg

Single-stage

2-Stage System

vs.

Filter Installation

  • Side access housing
  • 4 rows of 20” tall tracks
  • 5 columns of filters 24” wide
  • Side-load gasketing
  • Two stages
    • 2” pleated pre-filter
    • 20”x24”x12” box filter
  • Single stage – no pre-filter
    • 20”x24”x20” pocket filter
    • 4 pockets per filter
slide14

A Case Study in Energy and Life Cycle Cost Savings

Head-to-Head Pressure Drop Across Filter Banks

Data courtesy MTSU

slide15

A Case Study in Energy and Life Cycle Cost Savings

Illustration of Pressure Drop Comparison Across Filter Banks

slide16

A Case Study in Energy and Life Cycle Cost Savings

Energy Monitoring

  • ABB variable frequency drives (VFD)
  • 30 HP motors
  • Hourly data logging of motor voltage and current for each air handler
  • Power data then tabulated in Excel

Data Example

(courtesy MTSU)

slide17

A Case Study in Energy and Life Cycle Cost Savings

Energy Monitoring Results

Data courtesy MTSU

slide18

A Case Study in Energy and Life Cycle Cost Savings

Filter Pressure Drop Checks under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

sustainability impact in addition to energy reduction
Sustainability Impact – In Addition to Energy Reduction
  • Potential waste reduction on campus
    • Major reduction in filter usage
      • Pre-filters eliminated
  • 3x lifetime of typical box/cell filters

Filter Qty: 300  20

93% potential reduction in usage over 3 yr period

filtration life cycle cost reduction
Filtration Life Cycle Cost Reduction
  • Note importance of energy consumption
  • For every 0.1” w.g. reduction in P there is an energy savings of $17 per filter per year (@ $0.06 per kWh)

Initial Filter Costs

Operating Costs

  • Case Study Total Cost of Ownership Impact (over 3 years)
    • Energy Cost 44%
    • Filter Cost 54%
    • Labor Cost 86%
  • Overall 50%
slide21

Additional University Case Studies

Additional Example #1 Southeast

Additional Example #2 - Midwest

Additional Example #3

Northeast

  • V-bank Type Filter (no pre-filter)
  • Filter dP at 30 months of service: 0.68” w.c. (new 0.28” w.c.)
  • Case study presented at 2010 MIAPPA summer conference: www.fm.wmich.edu/miappa/conf/s10/index.html
  • Pocket Filter (no pre-filter)
  • Filter dP after 24 months of service: 0.24” w.c. (new = 0.20” w.c.)
  • Pocket Filter (no pre-filter)
  • Filter dP after 40 months of service: 0.29” w.c.

Previous Incumbent:

Pre-filters:

changed quarterly

Final filters: changed every 12-18 months

Previous Incumbent:

Pre-filters:

changed quarterly

Final filters: changed annually

Previous Incumbent:

Pre-filters:

changed quarterly

Final filters: changed every 12-18 months

greenguard certification
Greenguard Certification

Check air filters for certification

  • 3rd party qualification
  • Assesses emissions of VOC’s (i.e. formaldehyde)
  • Evaluates product for mold/fungi growth

Greenguard Certificate of Compliance

trends in air filtration market
Trends in Air Filtration Market
  • Elimination of roll filters
  • Consolidation of 2-stage pleated filter + box filter to long-life pocket technology or V-bank filters
  • Higher efficiencies (LEED - MERV 13)
  • End-user focus on energy conservation (lower dP filters)
  • End-user focus on life cycle costs
  • End-user focus on sustainability and less waste
  • Growth of synthetic media filters vs. glass due to:
    • Lower cost
    • Moisture resistance
    • Lower VOC emissions
  • Ultraviolet (UV) lights used in conjunction with air filters to help keep heat transfer coils ultra clean
  • Nanofiber filter media
  • Glass fiber shedding
  • More puncture resistant
  • Installer friendly (skin contact)
ad