slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Multilevel Intervention With Low Income and Minority Older Adults To Improve Influenza Vaccination Acceptance PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Multilevel Intervention With Low Income and Minority Older Adults To Improve Influenza Vaccination Acceptance

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 18

Multilevel Intervention With Low Income and Minority Older Adults To Improve Influenza Vaccination Acceptance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 300 Views
  • Uploaded on

Multilevel Intervention With Low Income and Minority Older Adults To Improve Influenza Vaccination Acceptance Jean J. Schensul Institute for Community Research www.incommunityresearch.org Prepared for: 2nd Annual NIH Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation, January, 2009

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Multilevel Intervention With Low Income and Minority Older Adults To Improve Influenza Vaccination Acceptance' - emily


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Multilevel Intervention With Low Income and Minority Older Adults To Improve Influenza Vaccination Acceptance

Jean J. Schensul

Institute for Community Research

www.incommunityresearch.org

Prepared for: 2nd Annual NIH Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation, January, 2009

partners and personnel
ICR

North Central Area Agency on Aging

V.N.A. Health Care

State Dept. of Public Health

Hartford Housing Authority

Other Building Managers

University of Connecticut

Health Center/Center on Aging

Jean Schensul, Ph.D.

Janet McElhaney, M.D.

Kim Radda, M.A.

Elsie Vazquez, B.A.

Ken Williamson, Ph.D.

Rita Gepsen, M.D.

George Kuchel, M.D.

Carmen Reyes, M.S.

William Disch, Ph.D.

Emil Coman, Ph.D.

Partners/ and /Personnel
goals of presentation
Goals of Presentation
  • Describe multilevel community based project aims, core components, level goals and outcomes
  • Present framework for multilevel dissemination/implementation and evaluation
  • Outline major considerations in community based MLI dissemination/implementation research
rationale for vaccination interventions for low income and minorityolder adults
Rationale for Vaccination Interventions for Low Income and MinorityOlder Adults
  • Influenza is preventable
  • Vaccination can prevent 70% of influenza infections,
  • Vaccination can reduce the cost and severity of secondary illnesses and influenza related deaths.
  • 35 – 45% of racial/ethnic minority older adults are vaccinated each year in comparison to 60-70% white older adults.
  • The SG recommended level is 90% for non-institutionalized adults over 65 years of age.
  • Public health efforts including campaigns, clinic outreach and community flu clinics have not reached these older adults.
  • To do so requires a multilevel targeted approach
slide6

Source of the Problem and Focus of Intervention

Regional and State Public Health Educators and vaccine experts

Vaccine Delivery System

Housing Authority/Management

REM

Residents

In Senior Housing

Service providers/senior advocates

v i p intervention
V.I.P. Intervention
  • Goals:
    • To improve vaccination rates, knowledge and pro-vaccination beliefs and norms
    • Build sustainable public health promotion structures at multiple levels
  • Approach:
    • Build a vertical Influenza Strategic Alliance (ISA)
    • Increase building management health awareness
    • Build resident flu vaccination advocacy committees to deliver flu campaigns
    • Engage these groups with residents for sustainable relationships, vaccination increase and other health initiatives
core components
Theoretical Processes

Communications (message consistency, strength, formats, delivery)

Ecological (multilevel interaction)

Empowerment (capacity to learn and act independently)

Constructivist (facilitated process of knowledge and action co-construction)

Program Structures

Influenza Strategic Alliance

Building management

Building committees

Individual residents

Program Elements

Training curriculum

FAQs/flip book

Visuals (film)

Campaign (and campaign components)

Committee self-evaluation

Core Components
intervention
Intervention
  • Formation and activation of Influenza Strategic Alliance
  • Partnership with building management
  • Formation and activation of V.I.P. committee
  • Training of V.I.P. Committee
  • Development and delivery of two influenza vaccination campaigns
  • Implementation of two flu clinics
  • Cross-sectional pre and post surveys in intervention and comparison buildings
  • Ethnographic process and ML outcome documentation
site and target population
Site and Target Population

Demographics

Interv. Compar.

Education .

< 8th Grade 38% 48%

Income

< $800/mo) 84% 77%

Time in Htfd.

Mean years 25.6 27.5

Time in Bldg.

Mean years 4.5 4.6

Language

preference

(English/Spanish) 73/27% 40/60%

Northeastern City

Older Adult Housing

Intervention and Comparison Buildings Baseline Sample

(N=73) (N = 107)

Population Composition

Interv. Comp.

PR 51% 56%

Af/Am 33% 18%

W. Indian 9% 1%

White 7% 15%

Female 35% 44%

Male 65% 56%

intervention process outcomes
Intervention Process/Outcomes
  • Influenza Strategic Alliance

Process: Formed alliance, supported V.I.P. Committee, provided funding for uninsured vaccinations.

, Outcomes: continued to meet, promoted intervention elsewhere in state.

  • Building Management

Process: Supported V.I.P. Committee, provided resources, advocated for flu clinics.

, Outcomes: sustained flu clinics independently; supported other public health efforts

intervention process outcomes12
Intervention Process/Outcomes
  • V.I.P. Committee

Process: Expanded membership, became flu experts,developed and adapted campaign materials, implemented flu campaigns, reached 70% or more of target population

Outcome: Expanded membership, repeated campaign with less support, expanded to other public health activities.

These processes and outcomes encompassed adaptation, implementation, sustainability and infrastructural expansion.

indvidual level cognitive social and behavioral outcomes
Indvidual Level Cognitive, Social and Behavioral Outcomes

Beliefs, Attitudes, Self-efficacy, Social Influence

Beliefs about Vaccination

Perceived barriers to vaccination NS

Perceived consequences of influenza

Worry about the flu

Vaccination self efficacy NS

Social influence to

Vaccinate

Vaccination Outcomes

21%

The odds of getting the flu vaccine changed from 1.92 at pre-test to 5.59 at post test in the treatment group.

filling in the gaps
Filling in the Gaps
  • Disseminating/Implementing a successful intervention in each new setting calls for:
    • Identifying core processual, structural and content components
    • Integrating intersection of theoretical processes and content/content delivery mechanisms in each dissemination/implementation process cell; and
    • at each structural level.
slide15

Core Components

  • Theoretical Processes
  • Program Structures
  • Program Elements (content)
slide16
Outcome Evaluation (efficacy, reach)
    • Outcomes at each “structural” level (anticipated and emergent)
    • Outcome design options involving comparisons:
      • Study versus matched control buildings
      • Study versus control communities (where all buildings in the intervention communities are involved in the intervention)
      • study buildings in a single community over time (where all study buildings are involved; case study design
      • These designs address the challenge of small Ns in multilevel intervention studies
    • Interactions among levels at critical time points
cost effectiveness overall minus research evaluation costs
Cost Effectiveness (Overall minus research/evaluation costs)
  • Individual level: per unit cost of hospitalization for flu related problems against per unit cost of vaccination intervention.
  • Building level: cost of implementation (VIP, session resources, incentives etc.) against estimated or actual cost of building hospitalizations for flu related problems.
  • Start up costs in towns versus continuation costs.
    • Start up costs include full time coordinator, training and incentives costs, and campaign costs
    • Continuation costs include half time coordinator, minimized training and incentives costs and campaign costs,
  • Evaluation costs
    • Start up costs include full time coordinator, staffing, training and incentives costs, and campaign costs
    • Continuation costs include half time coordinator, minimized training and incentives costs and campaign costs,
points to remember
Points to Remember
  • Indepth/long term relationships with communities or extensive formative research to identify levels and focal points for intervention
  • Multiple level intervention for sustained change
  • Small N GRCTs and case study designs are required.
  • Multiple level interventions involve the intersection of level and core components (process, structure and content).
  • Theory in MLIs cuts across levels.
  • MLIs are intentional change efforts inserted into ongoing systems.
  • Evaluation tools needed at each level that make it easier to evaluate in large scale dissemination and diffusion.