how does the sample affect the measurement of different carbon fractions l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
How Does the Sample Affect the Measurement of Different Carbon Fractions? PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
How Does the Sample Affect the Measurement of Different Carbon Fractions?

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 32

How Does the Sample Affect the Measurement of Different Carbon Fractions? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 293 Views
  • Uploaded on

How Does the Sample Affect the Measurement of Different Carbon Fractions?. Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno, NV presented at the

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'How Does the Sample Affect the Measurement of Different Carbon Fractions?' - emily


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
how does the sample affect the measurement of different carbon fractions

How Does the Sample Affect the Measurement of Different Carbon Fractions?

Judith C. Chow Desert Research InstituteReno, NVpresented at the

International Workshop for the Development of Research Strategies for the Sampling and Analysis of Organic and Elemental Carbon Fractions in Atmospheric Aerosols

Durango, Colorado

March 4, 2003

types of sample effects
Types of Sample Effects
  • Filter samples
  • Carbon particle composition
  • Chemical and physical interactions between carbon and other constituents
filter sample biases
Filter Sample Biases
  • Non-uniform filter deposit biases scaling from punch to whole filter
  • Non-uniform filter punch deposit biases optical monitoring and charring
  • Too light or too dark particle deposits make pyrolysis correction uncertain
  • More heavily loaded samples require longer combustion time at each temperature step
  • Organic vapor adsorption and volatilization in filter biases OC and pyrolysis correction
carbon particle composition
Carbon Particle Composition
  • Ambient mixtures, source mixtures, and pure carbon substances do not respond to heating in the same way
  • Thermal evolution protocols are poorly documented and characterized
  • Thermal evolution temperatures are not optimized to bracket compositions
  • Carbonates are not present in most ambient PM2.5 samples, and CaCO3 evolves at >800 °C if they are present
  • Samples do not respond the same as calibration standards
at least 15 international thermal combustion carbon methods
At Least 15 International Thermal Combustion Carbon Methods
  • Oregon Graduate Institute thermal optical reflectance (TOR) (Huntzicker et al., 1982)
  • IMPROVE TOR and thermal optical transmittance (TOT) (Chow et al., 1993, 2001)
  • NIOSH TOT (NIOSH, 1999)
  • ACE-Asia TOT (Mader et al., 2001)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology UST-3 TOT (Yang and Yu, 2002)
at least 15 international thermal combustion carbon methods continued
At Least 15 International Thermal Combustion Carbon Methods (continued)
  • Meteorological Service of Canada MSC1 TOT (Sharma et al., 2002)
  • U.S. Speciation Trends Network (STN) TOT
  • General Motors Research Laboratory two temperature (Cadle et al., 1980)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory two temperature (Tanner et al., 1982)
  • Japanese two temperature (Mizohata and Ito, 1985)
at least 15 international thermal combustion carbon methods continued8
At Least 15 International Thermal Combustion Carbon Methods (continued)
  • Two-temperature thermal manganese oxidation (Fung, 1990)
  • R&P two temperature (Rupprecht et al., 1995)
  • French two-temperature pure oxygen combustion (Cachier, 1989a, 1989b)
  • Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory continuous temperature ramp (Novakov, 1982)
  • German VDI extraction/combustion(Verein Deutcher Ingenieure, 1999)
differences among operating parameters
Differences among Operating Parameters
  • Sample aliquot and size
  • Oxidation (C to CO2) catalyst
  • Evolved carbon detection method
  • Carrier gas flow through or across the sample
  • Location of the temperature monitor relative to the sample
  • Combustion atmospheres
  • Temperature ramping rates
  • Temperature plateaus
  • Residence time at each plateau
  • Optical monitoring configuration and wavelength
  • Standardization
laboratory intercomparisons are not consistent schmid et al 2001

13TOR

11TOT

10TOT

12TOT

11bTOT

11TOT

12TOT

13TOR

10TOT

11bTOT

Laboratory intercomparisons are not consistent (Schmid et al., 2001)
improve carbon thermogram
IMPROVEcarbon thermogram

Sample from Hong Kong urban site on 04/17/01 with 9.9 ± 0.8 ug/m3 OCand 7.8 ± 0.8 ug/m3 EC

STNcarbon thermogram

carbon source profiles watson et al 1994
Carbon Source Profiles(Watson et al., 1994)

Gasoline-fueled vehicles

Diesel-fueled vehicles

hong kong vehicle exhaust profiles cao et al 2003
Hong Kong Vehicle Exhaust Profiles (Cao et al., 2003)

Source Differences in Carbon Fractions

no relationship between ec and carbonate by acidification chow and watson 2002
No relationship between EC and carbonate by acidification(Chow and Watson, 2002)

IMPROVE samples and IMPROVE protocol

carbon standards should be similar to samples
Carbon Standards Should be Similar to Samples
  • Water-soluble organics (e.g., sucrose, KHP, organic acids)
  • Carbon dioxide and methane
  • Nebulized charcoal resuspension
  • Carbon blacks
  • Graphite powders
  • Organic dyes (e.g., nigrosin, C48N9H51)
  • Carbon arc emissions
  • Simulated source emissions
  • Neutral density filters
some organic compounds absorb light justus et al 1993
Some Organic Compounds Absorb Light(Justus et al., 1993)

Transmission through nigrosin (C48N9H51) dye

chemical and physical interactions of carbon with other constituents
Chemical and Physical Interactions of Carbon with Other Constituents
  • Oxidation interactions
  • Catalytic reactions
  • Optical interactions
catalytic reactions with glass fiber filter 525 c lin and friedlander 1988a 1988b 1988c
Catalytic reactions with glass-fiber filter (525 °C)(Lin and Friedlander, 1988a, 1988b, 1988c)

Na, K, Pb, Mn, Fe, Ca, V, Cu, Ni, Co, and Cr compounds are known catalysts

carbon fractions are probably different for different applications
Carbon Fractions are Probably Different for Different Applications
  • Visibility and radiation balance
    • Visible light absorption and scattering by particles in the atmosphere
  • Source attribution
    • Consistently define fractions in source and receptor samples
  • Health effects
    • Absorption of toxic substances on EC
  • Chemical and physical models
    • Reaction surfaces, catalytic properties
research needs
Research Needs
  • Critically summarize and review non-atmospheric carbon literature
  • Document methods (combustion temperatures, ramping rates, residence times, optical pyrolysis corrections)
  • Prepare different standards representing different black carbon sources
  • Perform optical modeling to verify changes in absorption and scattering properties
research needs continued
Research Needs(continued)
  • Optimize carbon fractions for source identification
  • Quantify effects of pyrolysis on and within a filter to resolve reflectance/transmittance differences
  • Quantify effects of non-absorbing particles, optical monitoring wavelengths, initial darkness, carbonate deposits, and oxygen-supplying minerals
  • Calibrate reflectance and transmittance measurements and report with carbon fractions at beginning, minimum, oxygen introduction, and end of analysis
references
References

Cachier, H.; Bremond, M.P.; and Buat-Ménard, P. (1989a). Thermal separation of soot carbon. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 10(2):358-364.

Cachier, H.; Bremond, M.P.; and Buat-Ménard, P. (1989b). Determination of atmospheric soot carbon with a simple thermal method. Tellus, 41B(3):379-390.

Cadle, S.H.; Groblicki, P.J.; and Stroup, D.P. (1980). An automated carbon analyzer for particulate samples. Anal. Chem., 52(13):2201-2206.

Cao, J.J.; Ho, K.F.; Lee, S.C.; Fung, K.; Zhang, X.Y.; Chow, J.C.; and Watson, J.G. (2003). Characterization of roadside fine particulate carbon and its 8 fractions in Hong Kong. Sci. Total Environ., submitted.

Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Pritchett, L.C.; Pierson, W.R.; Frazier, C.A.; and Purcell, R.G. (1993). The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance carbon analysis system: Description, evaluation and applications in U.S. air quality studies. Atmos. Environ., 27A(8):1185-1201.

references continued
References(continued)

Chow,J.C. (1995). Summary of the 1995 A&WMA critical review: Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles. EM 1, 12-15.

Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Crow, D.; Lowenthal, D.H.; and Merrifield, T. (2001). Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 34(1):23-34.

Chow, J.C.; and Watson, J.G. (2002). PM2.5 carbonate concentrations at regionally representative Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment sites. J. Geophys. Res., 107(D21):ICC 6-1-ICC 6-9. doi: 10.1029/2001JD000574.

Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Kuhns, H.D.; Etyemezian, V.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Crow, D.J.; Kohl, S.D.; Engelbrecht, J.P.; and Green, M.C. (2003). Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. Chemosphere, submitted.

Fung, K.K. (1990). Particulate carbon speciation by MnO2 oxidation. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 12(1):122-127.

Fung, K.K.; Chow, J.C.; and Watson, J.G. (2002). Evaluation of OC/EC speciation by thermal manganese dioxide oxidation and the IMPROVE method. J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 52(11):1333-1341.

references continued29
References(continued)

Huntzicker, J.J.; Johnson, R.L.; Shah, J.J.; and Cary, R.A. (1982). Analysis of organic and elemental carbon in ambient aerosols by a thermal-optical method. In Particulate Carbon: Atmospheric Life Cycle, G.T. Wolff and R.L. Klimisch, Eds. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 79-88.

Justus, B.L.; Huston, A.L.; and Campillo, A.J. (1993). Broadband thermal optical limiter. Appl. Phys. Lett., 63(11):1483-1485.

Lin, C.; and Friedlander, S.K. (1988a). Soot oxidation in fibrous filters. 1. Deposit structure and reaction mechanisms. Langmuir, 4(4):891-898.

Lin, C.; and Friedlander, S.K. (1988b). Soot oxidation in fibrous filters. 2. Effects of temperature, oxygen partial pressure, and sodium additives. Langmuir, 4(4):898-903.

Lin, C.I.; and Friedlander, S.K. (1988c). A note on the use of glass fiber filters in the thermal analysis of carbon containing aerosols. Atmos. Environ., 22(3):605-607.

references continued30
References(continued)

Mader, B.T.; Flagan, R.C.; and Seinfield, J.H. (2001). Sampling atmospheric carbonaceous aerosols using a particle trap impactor/denuder sampler. Environ. Sci. Technol., 35(24), 4857-4867.

Mizohata, A.; and Ito, N. (1985). Analysis of organic and elemental carbon in atmospheric aerosols by thermal method. Annual Report of the Radiation Center of Osaka Prefecture, 26(0):51-55.

NIOSH (1999). Method 5040 Issue 3 (Interim): Elemental carbon (diesel exhaust). In NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH.

Novakov, T. (1982). Soot in the atmosphere. In Particulate Carbon: Atmospheric Life Cycle, G.T. Wolff and R.L. Klimisch, Eds. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 19-41.

references continued31
References(continued)

Rupprecht, E.G.; Patashnick, H.; Beeson, D.E.; Green, R.E.; and Meyer, M.B. (1995). A new automated monitor for the measurement of particulate carbon in the atmosphere. In Proceedings, Particulate Matter: Health and Regulatory Issues, J.A. Cooper and L.D. Grant, Eds. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 262-267.

Schmid, H.P.; Laskus, L.; Abraham, H.J.; Baltensperger, U.; Lavanchy, V.M.H.; Bizjak, M.; Burba, P.; Cachier, H.; Crow, D.J.; Chow, J.C.; Gnauk, T.; Even, A.; ten Brink, H.M.; Giesen, K.P.; Hitzenberger, R.; Hueglin, C.; Maenhaut, W.; Pio, C.A.; Puttock, J.; Putaud, J.P.; Toom-Sauntry, D.; and Puxbaum, H. (2001). Results of the "Carbon Conference" international aerosol carbon round robin test: Stage 1. Atmos. Environ., 35(12):2111-2121.

Sharma, S.; Brook, J.; Cachier, H.; Chow, J.C.; Gaudenzi, A.; and Lu, G. (2002). Light absorption and thermal measurements of black carbon in different regions of Canada. J. Geophys. Res., 107(D24):AAC 11-1-AAC 11-11. doi:10.1029/2002JD002496.

references continued32
References(continued)

Tanner, R.L.; Gaffney, J.S.; and Phillips, M.F. (1982). Determination of organic and elemental carbon in atmospheric aerosol samples by thermal evolution. Anal. Chem., 54(9):1627-1630.

Verein Deutcher Ingenieure (1999). Method 2465 Part 2: Measurement of soot (ambient air)-Thermographic determination of elemental carbon after thermal desorption of organic carbon. Prepared by Verein Deutcher Ingenieure, Beuth, Berlin, FRG.

Watson, A.Y.; and Valberg, P.A. (2001). Carbon black and soot: Two different substances. Am. Industrial Hygiene Assoc. J., 62(Mar/Apr):218-228.

Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Pritchett, L.C.; Frazier, C.A.; Neuroth, G.R.; and Robbins, R. (1994). Differences in the carbon composition of source profiles for diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles. Atmos. Environ., 28(15):2493-2505.

Yang, H.; and Yu, J.Z. (2002). Uncertainties in charring correction in the analysis of elemental and organic carbon in atmospheric particles by thermal/optical methods. Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(23):5199-5204.