Risk Management Of High Profile Public Events. Tour de France Stage 1 – Canterbury Finish 8 July 2007. Tour De France Stage 1 Objectives. Tour De France Stage 1 Strategic Risks. Tour De France Stage 1 Contractual Relationships. Transport For London Opening Ceremony 6 July 2007
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Risk Management Of High Profile Public Events Tour de France Stage 1 – Canterbury Finish 8 July 2007
Tour De France Stage 1 Contractual Relationships Transport For London Opening Ceremony 6 July 2007 Prologue Stage 7 July 2007 First Stage 8 July 2007 Amaury Sport Organisation Tour De France Organisers The Race Innovision Event Organisers (London) Medway Council The Route Crowd Management Kent County Council The Route Crowd Management (Route) Canterbury City Council Finish Zone Canterbury High School The Permanence Pennine Events Crowd Management (Route)
Tour De France Stage 1Partners Key Partners Kent Highways Transport For London Innovision ASO Police British Transport Police Fire & Rescue Ambulance Service Kent & Canterbury Hospital Other Partners NHS Social Services Pennine Events Mid Kent Water Transco Canterbury High School Suppliers Stakeholders Elected Members Residents Local Business Funding Partners Sponsors
Tour De France Stage 1 8 July 2007
Tour De France Stage 1CCC Planning Groups The Finish Line Planning Group AKA – The Bronze Group The Supports Events Group The Safety Group Commercial Health Manager Project Leader Project Manager Events Manager Health & Safety Officer Risk Management Officer Procurement Officer The Stakeholder Group
Contingency Risks • Threatened Terrorist Attack • Actual Terrorist Attack (conventional) • CBRN Terrorist Attack • Gas Leak • Gas Explosion • Grand Stand collapse • Major Fire (near the race route) • Air Crash • Excessive Heat • Overcrowding
Outcomes – Countywide • Watched by an estimated two million people along the route • £37 million income boost for Kent business (KCC estimate) • Ambulance response times maintained
Outcomes - Canterbury • 81% of residents felt the Tour coming to Canterbury was a good thing only 5% a bad thing – survey by Canterbury Christchurch University • 94% of residents were aware that the Tour was coming to Canterbury and most awareness was around road closures and route details – Canterbury Christchurch College University
Outcomes - Canterbury • 72% of businesses interviewed felt the Tour coming had been a positive thing and only 11% a negative - survey by Canterbury Christchurch University • Viewed by an estimated 50,000 people in the Canterbury sector – Kent Police estimates
Conclusions • High profile events are high risk. • Risk management cannot be a ‘bolt on’. • Opportunity to demonstrate the benefits of risk management. • A danger of ‘overselling’ events can be risk in itself.