1 / 22

REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN

REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN. “Connecting People and Places”. CRTPA Board September 20, 2010. Regional Mobility Plan. Future Scenarios. Data Collection. Establish Baseline and Future Conditions. Goals & Objectives. Needs Assessment. Determine Funding Constraints. Sector Analysis.

emily-aguilar
Download Presentation

REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN “Connecting People and Places” CRTPA Board September 20, 2010

  2. Regional Mobility Plan Future Scenarios Data Collection Establish Baseline and Future Conditions Goals & Objectives Needs Assessment Determine Funding Constraints Sector Analysis Corridor Analysis Regional Mobility Plan Develop Recommendations Prioritize Needs Coordination and Public Participation

  3. Project Activities • Needs Plan Project Assessment • All projects assessed • Financial Resources • Revenues • Project Cost Estimates • Development of cost constrained plan alternatives • Alternative 1 – FDOT unit costs on all projects • Alternative 2 • Local costs applied to projects within Tallahassee • Other projects used FDOT unit costs

  4. Needs Plan • Comprehensive list of projects • Existing studies and plans • Local governments • CRTPA Board and Committees • Public input • Project Assessment • Based on adopted strategies, goals and objectives • Rural and urban assessment criteria (16 points available) • Assessment strategy of within identified growth area – 3 points • Transit criteria (12 points available) • Applied factor to transit projects to match same total assessment points as non-transit projects

  5. Financial Resources • Anticipated Revenues • Information provided by FDOT District 3 and local governments • Available funds include anticipated state/federal funds and any local funds • State and Local funds dedicated to specific systems, programs and/or projects • SIS/FIHS • Maintenance • Local paving and maintenance • Blueprint • Cost constrained revenue estimates only include federal/state/local non-dedicated funds

  6. Financial Resources • Anticipated revenues constant for both alternatives • Federal requirement: • Project costs and revenues developed in present day dollars and in Year of Expenditure dollars • Inflation factors provided by FDOT District 3 • Revenues and costs inflated by tier • Tier 1: 2016 – 2020 • Tier 2: 2021 – 2025 • Tier 3: 2026 – 2030 • Tier 4: 2031 – 2035 • Adopted TIP (2011 – 2015) considered as committed • Cost constrained plan must balance expenditures to revenues

  7. Financial Resources: Revenues

  8. Financial Resources • Project costs • Received updated FDOT unit costs • Developed cost estimates for all Needs Plan projects • Cost constrained Alternative 1 • Received costs from Tallahassee Leon County Planning Department • Specific to local Tallahassee projects • Significantly higher than FDOT costs • Incorporate costs to address specific project issues • Cost constrained Alternative 2

  9. Development of Alternatives • Existing project status • Major project priority list • Identified projects to address priorities through operational projects, transit, bicycle and/or pedestrian projects • Project assessment ranking • Connectivity • Financial balancing by tier

  10. Current Draft Alternatives • Quincy By-Pass is in Tier 1 in both alternatives • Should stimulus funding become available, additional projects may be added • Capital City to the Sea construction is only for some elements, not the total project • Trail and Greenway allocation included for projects to be determined through ongoing effort • Alternative maps show construction only • Do not include projects scheduled for other project phases

  11. Development of Alternatives • Anticipate potential changes based on • Updated transit revenue information • Public meetings • Other input • Financial balancing requirement • Project additions = Project deletions

  12. Draft Cost Constrained Plan – Alternative 1

  13. Alternative 1: Draft Cost Constrained Plan

  14. Alternative 1: Draft Cost Constrained Plan

  15. Draft Cost Constrained Plan – Alternative 2

  16. Alternative 2: Draft Cost Constrained Plan

  17. Alternative 2: Draft Cost Constrained Plan

  18. Recommendation • Approve moving forward with Alternative 1 • Costs in Alternative 1 are the most recent generalized planning costs and are applicable/appropriate for a regional approach • Costs used are consistent throughout the region • Costs identified in Alternative 2 are from 2008 and do not incorporate recent downward adjustments • As projects move forward, specific issues to be addressed can be identified and costs refined

  19. Next Steps • Public Meetings week of October 4th • Gadsden County – Tuesday, October 5 at 6:00 pm • Outside of County Commission meeting • Wakulla County – Tuesday, October 5 • 5:00 – 7:00 pm • County Commission Chambers • Jefferson County – Thursday, October 7 at 9:00 am • Outside of County Commission meeting • Leon County – Thursday, October 7 • 4:30 – 6:30 pm • Leroy Collins Public Library, Program Room A

  20. Next Steps • Document and address all comments • CRTPA Board Retreat in October • Final Draft cost constrained plan • Transit Development Plan • Corridor Planning • Sector Plans • Adoption of Regional Mobility Plan - November

More Related