1 / 13

Bettina M. Stopford R.N. Director Public Health and Medical Emergency Preparedness

Development of Models for Emergency Preparedness: Personal Protective Equipment, Decontamination, Isolation/Quarantine, and Laboratory Capacity. Bettina M. Stopford R.N. Director Public Health and Medical Emergency Preparedness Homeland Security Support Operations

emele
Download Presentation

Bettina M. Stopford R.N. Director Public Health and Medical Emergency Preparedness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development of Models for Emergency Preparedness:Personal Protective Equipment, Decontamination, Isolation/Quarantine, and Laboratory Capacity Bettina M. Stopford R.N. Director Public Health and Medical Emergency Preparedness Homeland Security Support Operations Science Applications International Corporation McLean, VA

  2. Project Overview & Goals • AHRQ Bioterrorism Initiative • To examine current evidence-based best practices and present them in an operationally pertinent format for the end user. • Review research and obtain key stakeholder input 4 topic areas: • To assess, identify, measure, and prepare guidelines and models for evidence-based, best-demonstrated practices • Identify research gaps, shortfalls and future needs • Identify health care-focused enhancements to the existing automated exercise and assessment program scenarios, (AEAS).

  3. Methodology • Open-source literature research • Government/industry regulation reviews • Subject matter expert interviews • Stakeholder review of draft document and models • Stakeholder conference

  4. Stakeholders • Broad spectrum of Federal, State, local, academic, civilian, military, regulatory, operations, and clinical subject matter experts • JCAHO, OSHA, NIOSH, DHS ODP, HHS, CDC, SBCCOM, ATSDR, ENA, ACEP, AHA, ANA, APIC, ABSA, ASHE, ASTM, IACP, IAFC, IAEMT, DoD, APHL, NDMS, ASHRM, HRSA, USAMRIID, Risk Management, Law, Universities, public health, medical, nursing, bioethics, laboratory and hazardous materials professionals, among others

  5. Goals of Model Development • Create operational planning user tool • Evidence-based, best-demonstrated practices Results: • Four sets of guidelines/models developed • One electronic, interactive model for review

  6. Guideline Questions for Model • Adaptability: Is the best practice suitable for use in any region? • Throughput: How many victims of a WMD attack will the best practice aid? • Cost: How much will it cost regions to implement the best practice? • Operational Impact: What are the operational considerations of implementing best practice? • Training: What level of training does this best practice require?

  7. Guideline Questions for Model • Resources: Does the practice build on existing practices/infrastructure? Are there available resources to implement the practices? • Morbidity and Mortality: What impact will this practice have on saving lives? • Evidence-based Practice vs. Theory: Is there a body of professional research supporting this practice or is it theoretical? • Regulatory Compliance: Does the practice comply with existing regulations or does it require a regulatory change?

  8. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) • Distinguish between a contaminated patient event vs. an infectious patient event • PPE choice for an infectious patient/agent is determined by infection control guidelines • PPE choice for a contaminated patient is guided by new OSHA standards • PPE should be selected based on the results of a community-based hazards vulnerability analysis (HVA) that should reveal credible threats, as well a role (such as EMS vs. facility based)

  9. Isolation/Quarantine • Best practices model for plan development includes the following components: • Hazards Vulnerability Analysis • Review of existing community action plans • Gap analysis • Establish isolation barriers • Designated isolation/quarantine facilities

  10. Ease in fiscal restraints Technology use Legal and regulatory authority Surge capacity Mobile medical units Training and education Active, early surveillance Reporting incentives Increased Epi capacity Rapid ID, isolation, notification Isolation/QuarantineBest practices model for plan development includes the following components:

  11. Laboratory Capacity • Laboratories will play a critical role in the response to any BT event • Ensuring a practiced, streamlined system is paramount to achieve maximum laboratory surge capacity • Timeliness, accuracy and security of lab diagnostics will have a direct impact on containment, mitigation and clinical treatment • Laboratory surge capacity issues must be addressed at local, State and national levels • Three elements of containment determine BioSafety (BSL) level • Laboratory practices and techniques, safety equipment, and facility design

  12. Decontamination • A spiral development approach is required to build a community or region’s capacity • Decontamination should be fully integrated into Planning Organization Equipment Training and Exercises (POETE) • Decontamination best practices were quantified in an interactive emergency planning

  13. RESEARCH PRACTICE

More Related