html5-img
1 / 33

WP2 . Developing the IPR Toolbox

WP2 . Developing the IPR Toolbox. Progress presentation. Contents. Introduction to WP2 Objective Aims General workflow Introduction to the Toolbox Metadata tag Database structure Points to be discussed together Upcoming phases. WP2. Developing the IPR Toolbox. WP2 Objective:

ely
Download Presentation

WP2 . Developing the IPR Toolbox

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WP2 . Developing the IPR Toolbox Progress presentation

  2. Contents • Introduction to WP2 • Objective • Aims • General workflow • Introduction to the Toolbox • Metadata tag • Database structure • Points to be discussed together • Upcoming phases

  3. WP2. Developing the IPR Toolbox • WP2 Objective: To develop a Toolbox of IPR awareness and enforcement materials to be broadly used in other modules throughout the project and afterwards. This toolbox will be customized and updated during the overall project so that it could be used to provide regular and innovative services according to needs of targets of users (SMEs, repliers, intermediaries, etc) defined with the other WPs leaders.

  4. WP2  The Toolbox The Toolbox module is borne in mind with the aim to establish a set of applicable tools which will be useful for the other modules and beyond the scope of the project activities in creating the basic means to enable a rising in IPR awareness, management and exploitation. The aims of the toolbox are: • to collect and include currently used or available material; • to create a basis for the gathered tools comparison and content gap analysis; • to fill, by the production of new tools, the most relevant content gaps; • to make the gathered tools available in a structured and user friendly manner both inside and outside the project boundaries.

  5. WP2: introduction to the toolbox • The idea: a structured and customisable dataset of informative IP “items” Database structure: “The toolbox” Specific toolboxes IP items gathered in electronic version Users Tag of metadata Updating Integration

  6. Metadata tag • What? • A standard formtobefilledwith “metadata” (  data about data) decribing in anhomogeneusmanner the relevantcharacteristicstomanage each informative item collected in the Toolbox. • Why? • To classify the material gathered • Numerous • Heterogeneous • Variety of relevant dimensions • To allow items comparison • To develop toolbox content analysis  gaps finding • To make a user-friendly interface helping in the Toolbox usage • How? • General structure scheme (to be shared, validated, eventually updated)  relational database tables of the Toolbox; • Material tagging while uploading in the Toolbox through a gathering material web page or by the Toolbox management team; IP items gathered in electronic version Metadata tag

  7. Metadata tag  overview • Main Features: • 4 information blocks • Registry: standard item identification • Content: classification of the topic covered • Target: structured description of the intended audience • Maintenance: data required to allow proper Toolbox review and update • Every block will be translated in standard relational database tables (Access file) • The structure allows classification and storage of different media: • Documents / Video / Leaflets / Poster / ... • ...to build a web-publishable Toolbox • see Annex I for the full Metadata tag tree

  8. Metadata tag  general structure /1 Structure key

  9. Metadata tag  general structure /2 • Notes: • The tree of the Metadata tag scheme is coloured according to the structure key reported below; • Direct input gathering: it’s the possibility to write a string of text/number: • Organisation name: Polytechnic of Turin • Closed list input gathering: in this case the user is forced to choose between one of the listed values: • Geographical coverage: EPO • In some cases (orange boxes) the user is allowed to choose many values from the closed list; • Those lists will be enriched according to the dected project needs. Structure key

  10. Metadata tag  Registry /1 Structure key

  11. Metadata tag  Registry /2 • Notes: • This section is intended to provide a first item identification focused on its general properties; • It is articulated in: • Supplier: data identifying the source (country, organisation, contact person); • Media type: the format by which the item works (in the case it’s a document, the broader option, what kind of); • Intellectual property: it is referred to the item IP; • Authorised usage: a mandatory field to register what kind of use of the item is allowed; • Publication date • Due to the structure complexity, the tree scheme of this section is reported in a fully extend way only in the Annex 1 map.

  12. Metadata tag  Content /1 Structure key

  13. Metadata tag  Content /2 • Notes: • This section is focused on the description of the item informative content and it is articulated in : • Type of IP Rights: it is referred to which IPR is/are covered in the item; • AIDA classification: the presented closed list allows to detect which of the different AIDA marketing cathegories is closest to the item informative content. • Keywords: to describe the subject illustrated by the item. • Geographical coverage: what are the administrative boundaries of the IP involved in the informative item. Ex. A manual for the EPO filing written by the Italian Patent Office.  Registry / Supplier / Country: Italy  Content / Geographical coverage: EPO • Specificity: this input field is introduced to identify already available customisation according to the need of the project modules • Language

  14. Metadata tag  Target /1 Structure key

  15. Metadata tag  Target /2 • Notes: • This section is focused on the description of the target audience with respect to which the item is designed to be used; • It is articulated in: • Intended audience: the closed list allows a fast identification of the different professional categories that can be reached by the item; • Organisation: the closed list allows a fast identification of the different types of organisation that can be reached by the item;

  16. Metadata tag  Maintenance /1 Structure key

  17. Metadata tag  Maintenance /2 • Notes: • This section gathers a set of variable to be used in the review / update / integration of the items inserted in the Toolbox • It is articulated in: • Expiring date: if it is explicitly foreseen; • Expiring reason: when applicable, it is referred to the main reason an item should be updated (example: IPC classification periodical update making its content superseded); • Rating: this input cluster is designed to collect the feedback from the item users.

  18. Toolbox DataBase • What? • A relational database of metadata tags and related items to be generated and used through the project website. • Why? • Items tagging & uploading • Items analysis  gap finding  customisation • Browse item collection • Download selected item • Gather feedback / Reviewing • Update & Maintenance • How? • Metadata tag  relational database tables • DB masks  web interface / website pages Database structure: “The toolbox” Metadata tag

  19. Toolbox DataBase  user perspective Toolbox cover Authentication Control panel Registry form Main panel Manage users Tag & upload new item Manage items Leave a comment • See results • Download • Rate Manage comments Explore the toolbox

  20. Toolbox database  DB tables USER COMMENT RATE EXPERT ITEM One to Many relationship

  21. Toolbox DataBase  overview

  22. Toolbox scheme  database structure • Given the “tagged” items, it is possible to develop proper queries and consultation masks: • Ex. • Patents • Portfolio strategy • for Entrepreneurs • Publication date > 2000  Is something available in all the involved countries ?  Is there a gap ?  what kind of video contents are available ?

  23. Toolbox scheme  database creation Module I Focus on items for Facilitators developing services for SMEs. Module II Focus on items for SMEs in footwear, furniture, leather and textile industry. Module III Focus on items for Research projects IP management. Target Users Toolboxes

  24. Merging proposal: toolbox & training box Content  keyword Item type  document Registry: Item classification kind Content  keywords Registry : Item classification kind Training expert registry  country

  25. Points to be discussed together • IP classification • Merging proposal • Technical details • DBMS platform • Website programming language • Available space

  26. WP2: general workflow

  27. Task 2.1 – Toolbox start up (1-5)

  28. Task 2.2 – Toolbox enhancement (4-9)

  29. Task 2.3 – Toolbox deployment (9-16)

  30. Task 2.4 – Toolbox exploitation (9-36)

  31. Task 2.5 – Toolbox mainteinance (9-36)

  32. Task 2.6 – Toolbox audit (1-36)

  33. Thankyou!

More Related