1 / 11

A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010

A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010. Justin Goodwin: ETC-ACC Supported by EEA. Outline. Some Simple Analysis Some Awards. IIRs. Why ? Policy Makers the Public & Users of the data. Supports the data (NFR) Explain Emission Trends Understand areas needed for improvement

elvin
Download Presentation

A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010 Justin Goodwin: ETC-ACC Supported by EEA

  2. Outline • Some Simple Analysis • Some Awards

  3. IIRs Why ? • Policy Makers the Public & Users of the data. • Supports the data (NFR) • Explain Emission Trends • Understand areas needed for improvement • Build Trust in the data • National System, QA/QC, KCA • Highlight Limitations (IE, NE, Uncertainties) • Understand Changes • Makes Stage 3 Review Possible

  4. IIRs What ? • Transparency: including whether the data provided shows clearly the methods, assumptions and data sources used for the estimates. • Completeness: ensuring that all anthropogenic sources of emission are included for which there are methods provided in The Guidebook • Comparability: ensuring that emission estimates are compiled using similar and compatible methods across Parties and provided at a similar level of detail. • Consistency: ensuring that data provided by a party has consistent data and assumptions across years and pollutants reported. • Accuracy: assessment to ensure that uncertainties in emission estimates are minimised and that uncertainty analysis forms the basis of prioritising future improvements by the Party.

  5. IIR Performance 2010 • Scoring: • 4 forGood • 2 for Moderate • 1 for limited • 0 for No Information

  6. Things I didn’t Like • IIR template not followed • Organised by Pollutant • Trend description mixed in with methodology section • No overview of completeness or Accuracy • Lack of Efs/AD/Method Description for Key Categories Country Specific Methods • Not including all sector in IIR

  7. IIR Awards • Most Comprehensive • Most Innovative • Best Looking • Best Country < 10m

  8. Nominations: Most Comprehensive • France • Croatia • Includes projections in time series plots • Shows Targets in Trend analysis Plots • National Energy Balance • UK • Good Coverage of almost all elements • Denmark • Lots of Detail

  9. Nominations: Most Innovative • France • Ominea • Germany • Wiki • Portugal • F 9.1 Recalculation Plots • AD Plots in IIR • Slovenia • Annotated trend graphs fig 2 etc • Latvia • Fig 3.2 Key Category Plot • Transport Activity Plots

  10. Nominations: Best Looking • Germany • Wiki • Netherlands • Fig 1.3, Trend Plots, Summary Tables, General layout • Finland • Maps & Plots

  11. Nominations: Best Country (Population < 10m) • Estonia • Cyprus • Croatia • Latvia

More Related