240 likes | 347 Views
This article examines the significant changes brought about by the 2005 amendment to Japan's Antimonopoly Act (AMA) and its implications for the business community. It highlights the historical challenges faced by Japan's antitrust regime, including persistent hard-core cartels and low compliance awareness among corporations. The amendment empowered the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) with stronger enforcement tools like the Leniency Program and criminal investigation authority, leading to successful crackdowns on bid rigging. The analysis of recent cases underscores the evolving landscape of corporate compliance in Japan.
E N D
Can the New Antimonopoly Act Change the Japanese Business Community? The 2005 Amendment to Antimonopoly Act and Corporate Compliance Kazukiyo Onishi
Introduction: Japanese Antitrust Regime and Business Community • Antimonopoly Act, a comprehensive and advanced antitrust law was introduced and JFTC was set up in 1947: Long history of antitrust enforcement, but this regime did not work well • It was said for a long time: Existence of many hard core cartels, especially bid riggings and Japanese Business Community did not think highly of AMA • The situation is changing after 2005 amendment to AMA • 2005 amendment provides the JFTC with measures to fight cartels: Leniency Program and Criminal Investigation Power • Successful crackdowns on big bid riggings involved by big and famous companies
Recent Bid Rigging Casesprosecuted by the Japanese Penal Code
Australia and Japan: Criminal and Administrative Fines Australia: Draft Bill for Corporations Japan: Concurrent Fines for Corporations
Australia and Japan: Level of Penalties Australia: Administrative fine (maximum) Japan: Criminal and Administrative