1 / 19

Strategies to Influence Political Decision-Making: A Case Study at Clark County

Strategies to Influence Political Decision-Making: A Case Study at Clark County. Carolyn Heniges, PE, PLS Capstone Project - Portland State University June 2010. Introduction. Problem Definition Key Research Questions Research Methodology Outcome/Findings Significance/Implications

elmer
Download Presentation

Strategies to Influence Political Decision-Making: A Case Study at Clark County

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strategies to Influence Political Decision-Making: A Case Study at Clark County Carolyn Heniges, PE, PLS Capstone Project - Portland State University June 2010

  2. Introduction • Problem Definition • Key Research Questions • Research Methodology • Outcome/Findings • Significance/Implications • Acknowledgements • Questions

  3. Problem Definition • Engineers trained in sciences, engineering principles – objective, predictable, standards • Civil engineers’ primary role – protect ‘public’ safety, health and welfare and 30% of civil engineers move into administrative positions • Not prepared for politics or public policy-making – appears irrational, messy and emotional (subjective)

  4. Key Research Questions • How does engineering rationality differ from political rationality? • What do engineers need to know for successful policy-making and democratic governance? • What strategies can engineers learn to influence political decision-making ?

  5. Research Methodology • Policy-Making and Democratic Governance • Literature Research – Stone, Morgan & Birkland • Develop Strategies to Influence Political Decision-making • Literature Research – Stone & Jensen • Organized thirty-three strategies into six groups • Survey of Org. Members to Determine • Ranking ‘Effective’ Strategies • Use of Data/Evidence (testing hypotheses)

  6. Policy Making & Dem. Governance The King George Problem Corrective: Responsive Governance The Engaged Citizen Problem Corrective: Civic Governance The Democratic Balancewheel(Morgan, et al) The George Washington Problem Corrective: Competent and Energetic Governance The Shay’s Rebellion Problem Corrective: Minority Rights and Access to Governance • Articles of Confederation, Jacksonian and Populist Legacies • Deliberative gov’t • Smaller/weaker gov’t • Citizen legislature • Open government • Initiative process • Preference for non-monopolistic private markets • Referendum process • Anti-Federalist, Great Society Legacies • Citizen participation • Co-production • Local control • Decentralized administration • Face-to-face gov’t • Small, frugal gov’t • Federalist, Progressive and Entrepreneurial Legacies • Systematic planning • Efficiency • Effectiveness • Energetic government • Career civil service • Contracting out • Customer service • Federalism/filtering • Federalist, New Deal, Great Society – Strong Legal Legacies • Bill of rights • Equal treatment • Due process • Open government • Accountability protocols • Interest balancing The Extended Republic Federalism Pluralism

  7. Political Rationality • Politics – sphere of emotion, passion, irrationality, self-interest, shortsightedness, and raw power • Policy-making – an activity that includes rational analysis, objectivity, allegiance to truth, and pursuit of the well-being of the society as a whole • Value based • Best solutions are often balanced trade-offs Policy Paradox, Deborah Stone (2002)

  8. Engineering Rationality • Based on objectivity • Evidence/data valued • Preciseness • Maximizing ‘best’ solution within criteria • Predictable, repeatable, consistent • Failure based (learned lessons) • Follows rules, laws, standards & guidelines • Adapted to social and environmental context Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century, ASCE (2008)

  9. Influencing Strategies Discovered

  10. Outcomes – Individual Strategies Top 10

  11. Outcomes – Strategy Types

  12. Findings • Hypothesis #1: Data and Evidence is needed to influence political decision-making. 78% – True Politicians 100.0% Senior Managers 51.7% Directors 77.8% Staff Engineers 75.0%

  13. Findings • Hypothesis #2: The use of data and evidence needs to be combined with other strategies to be more effective at influencing political decision-making at Clark County. 96.8% – True Politicians 100.0% Senior Managers 100.0% Directors 100.0% Staff Engineers 91.7%

  14. Findings • Hypothesis #3: Engineers tend to use data and evidence as their primary influencing strategy. False Ranked 27th out of 33 strategies for Engineers

  15. Significance/Implications • Model of Society Model of Engineering Reasoning • Model of Policy Making • Model of Reasoning Model of Political Reasoning • Political Decision Making

  16. Significance/Implications • Engineers not trained to understand or deal with politics • Civil engineers especially need this skill set since they build public infrastructure • Implications for civil engineering degree programs and continuing education • Engineers’ data/evidence is needed, and taken in the larger context of political decision-making but not always primary deciding factor

  17. Key Research Questions/Answers    • How does engineering rationality differ from political rationality? • Why is the political framework necessary for successful policy-making and democratic governance? • What strategies can engineers learn to influence political decision-making ?

  18. Acknowledgements • Dr. Douglas Morgan (advisor, mentor and editor) • Dr. Masami Nishishibi (research support) • Heath Henderson, PE (problem definition and litmus test) • Susan Finch (editor) • Primary Resources: • ASCE Article - Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future (2008) • Deborah Stone, Policy Paradox (2002) • Morgan et al, Foundations of Public Service (2008) • Jason Jensen, Article - Getting One’s Way In Policy Debates (2007)

  19. Questions

More Related