1 / 29

Mechanical aspects important for determining the final wire position accuracy

Review of the New CERN Fast Wirescanner. Mechanical aspects important for determining the final wire position accuracy . Juan Herranz . Wire Scanner general considerations Sources of uncertainty Strategy to minimize uncertainties Summary Conclusions. General considerations. HOME position.

elaine
Download Presentation

Mechanical aspects important for determining the final wire position accuracy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review of the New CERN Fast Wirescanner Mechanical aspects important for determining the final wire position accuracy Juan Herranz

  2. Wire Scanner general considerations • Sources of uncertainty • Strategy to minimize uncertainties • Summary • Conclusions

  3. General considerations HOME position SPS configuration R = 156 mm Acceleration Shaft Fork Cons. Speed Beam Deceleration Same speed and position but different pick acceleration IN position

  4. General considerations Arm 1 Arm 2 Wire disk angular origin Shaft Motor side In this model we can determine the position of the point P as function of the angular position of the disk and the length of the fork Optical disk

  5. Sources of uncertainty Misalignment Disk – fork Forks-arms

  6. Sources of uncertainty Shaft twist reference Misalignment Disk – fork Forks-arms Motor Torque Shaft twist Acceleration and inertia produce a torque which produce a twist on the shaft

  7. Sources of uncertainty Shaft twist reference Misalignment Disk – fork Forks-arms Motor Torque Shaft twist Shaft Twist Acceleration and inertia produce a torque which produce a twist on the shaft

  8. Sources of uncertainty Shaft twist reference Misalignment Disk – fork Forks-arms Motor Torque Shaft twist Shaft Twist Because tangential acceleration the fork bends

  9. Sources of uncertainty Shaft twist reference Misalignment Disk – fork Forks-arms Motor Torque Shaft twist Shaft Twist Because tangential acceleration the wire have a deflection

  10. Sources of uncertainty Measured position “Deterministic” displacement due to the peak acceleration and the inertia of the system Real position Ø 312 Ø 140 Pick accel. 6700 rad/s^2 Optical disk, 3 mm thickness Wire, 12 strands of 7um Shaft Wire Path Disk FEA estimation FEA estimation Analytical estimation FEA estimation

  11. Sources of uncertainty Measured position Due to the variation of the acceleration we have a vibrational behaviour which amplitude is + / - the value of the deformation Real position Shaft Wire Path Disk

  12. Sources of uncertainty Beam-wire relative position uncertainty +/- 10 mm Beam For a wire deflection () of 20 μm and a beam-wire relative position of +/- 10 mm Wire Fork Shaft twist between arms not represented Motion APROXIMATIVE VALUES

  13. Sources of uncertainty Error in position: Error in width: Relative error in the projection: Real Beam axis Position error Width error Measured At 20m/s the wire needs 15μs to travel 300 μm In 15μs an oscillation of 170 μm amplitude and 1kHz can travel 8.5μm That represents a relative error 2.8%

  14. Minimization strategies - Design Digital mock-up N. Chritin Optimization of stiffness and inertia to minimize deformations See Sebastian’s presentation Digital mock-up N. Chritin

  15. Minimization strategies - Calibration Beam expender Scanner Laser Displacer Displacer Photodiode +/- 50 mm Calibration table diode signal IN OUT Thanks to Jonathan Emery time

  16. Minimization strategies – Motion pattern Wire fork simplified model Displacement 25 μm 30 μm 35 μm Vibration amplitude 50 μm 8 μm 3.5 μm Factor 1 0.16 0.07 Pattern optimization can provide large improvements in the residual vibrations minimization

  17. Minimization strategies – Vibration measurements Wire Wire resistance variation Gauge Strain gauge Wire Gauge

  18. Carlos Daniel Morais Pereira WB Strain Gauge (GF = 2.1) IA Amplification • G = 1000 • BS = ± 5V • 3 kHz LP filter • Fork speed: 10 m/s • G = 1000 • BS = ± 1V • 3 kHz LP filter • Fork speed: 10 m/s • R64 and R65 = 1kΩ

  19. Minimization strategies - Wire dynamic model Model Verification Wire resistance Wire deformations Results Measurements Strain gauge Wire analytical model Input Scanner Excitation Fork ang. position Dynamic model intended to provide quantitative experimental information about Residual vibration of the scanner

  20. Summary Expected approximate values after uncertainties minimization: (the expectation is to attend values of the same order of magnitude)

  21. Conclusions • The main sources of uncertainty for determining the wire position has been identified • Actions to minimize this uncertainties has been take and integrated in the design • Studies to minimize the influence of the motion pattern are ongoing • Vibration measurement and quantification system are in phase of test and development using the exiting calibration test bench for PS and PSB scanners and this systems are going to be integrated in the first prototype Many thanks !

  22. Tip deformation: 1.2 mm Angular speed: 90 rad/s Angular acceleration: 7000 rad/s^2

  23. 1st 133Hz 2nd 193Hz 2th 626Hz

  24. 15 m/sec check Typical results after calibration for PS scanner Jonathan Emery

  25. Jonathan Emery

  26. Plots under discussion

  27. ferrite coils wire

More Related