1 / 15

North Staffs Mood Pathway Update. 20/09/2012

North Staffs Mood Pathway Update. 20/09/2012. Stepped care approach. In accordance with the stepped care model (Psychological Care after Stroke, DoH, 2011). MDT Competencies. L.1 & L.2 Mood Screening. L.1 & L.2 psychological care.

efeller
Download Presentation

North Staffs Mood Pathway Update. 20/09/2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. North Staffs Mood Pathway Update. 20/09/2012

  2. Stepped care approach In accordance with the stepped care model (Psychological Care after Stroke, DoH, 2011)

  3. MDT Competencies

  4. L.1 & L.2 Mood Screening

  5. L.1 & L.2 psychological care

  6. Steering group(encompassing key people within stroke pathway) • Project Leads: J Morris OT-ASU / M O’Mara OT- ESD • Dr L Roberts –Clinical Psychologist • L Sillito – Stroke Rehab OT • B Lewis – Neuro Rehab OT • J Barnes / P Wells – H&S Network • J Rhodes – ASU Nurse • G Millward / M Edwards – Stroke Association • Objective: • To design and implement robust / standardised mood pathway within stroke • Reduce inappropriate referrals to Clinical Psychology

  7. Mood pathway • 1 pathway with 3 separate components to suit ASU, Rehab Unit & ESD (Community) • YALE – short screen completed within each stage of stroke pathway • Repeated as aware of discharge as potential trigger point / allows for review • Identified suitable screens for further assessment at each stage • Embed MDT emphasis / focus on mood within stroke care • Simple pathway / documentation • Decrease staff wariness re: mood / suicide risk

  8. Commence mood pathway: Yale screen before discharge -Clinical presentation - Monitoring / Observation Question: Does mood appear appropriate to diagnosis? Ongoing monitoring Strand 2 (L1/2) At risk / potential for mood disturbance at time of assessment Strand 1 (L1) Low or no risk / minimal potential for mood disturbance at time of assessment Referral to Clinical Psychology / IAPT / support agencies Clear management programme established Goal setting Further assessment appropriate to area Regular reviews Level 1 Psychological support Level 2 Psychological support • : • *Standard on discharge letter from all stroke services / checklist completed • - Clear identification of mood status • - Recommendations / ongoing management • 6-8/52 Stroke Consultant GP review 6/12 month & annual review

  9. Screening tools used Completed at all stages: • YALE • Observation / clinical presentation • Watchful waiting / monitoring • Further questions re: anxiety / mood if needed • BASDEC risk / suicide question if needed & intent noted Further assessment: • ASU: • DISCS, SADQH-10 (Hospital version), ? Signs of Depression Scale (SDSS) • ESD: • HADS, DISCS, SADQH-10 (Community version), BASDEC, Visual Analogue scale (VAS), Stroke Impact Scale • REHAB UNITS: • HADS, DISCS, SADQH-10 (Hospital version), BASDEC, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Distress Thermometer, Signs of Depression Scale (SDSS)

  10. Work in progress • Mood leaflet • Audit – • Patient / carer perspective • Staff perspective • Level 1 /2 psychological training for all staff • MDT engagement • Community links / education • Mood screen within 6/12 and annual reviews • Engagement with IAPT / other agencies • Cognitive pathway

  11. Positive outcomes • Providing structure to previously informal service • Inclusion within ASU standardised 72 hour monitoring paperwork • ASU exceeding ASI target 40% significantly • ESD / rehab unit screening 100% of patients • Improved handover re: mood issues / management between services / links with Clinical Psychology • Established training package • Increased MDT engagement / changes to MDT perception • Increased patient / carer involvement & self management plans – positive feedback!!!! No negative feedback!!!!! • Increased management plans / goals & confidence of therapy staff with complex case management • Developed links with H & S Network • Improved links with support services • Reduced inappropriate referrals to Clinical Psychology

  12. Lessons learnt • Clinical Psychology an asset! • Evolving process / review ongoing • Need to engage MDT as can fall on therapy staff – Identify key champions!!!! • Establish Training! • Patients / carers welcome opportunity to discuss at ANY stage!!!! HYPERACUTE / ACUTE not too early!!!!!! • Need to change MDT misconceptions re: mood screening • Use targets as levers to stimulate / maintain momentum • Utilise H & S Network • Don’t reinvent the wheel! Utilise SIP website • Provide patients / carers with screens to complete independently • Access voluntary agencies / support services • Review at different stages

  13. Training provides... • Political and clinical context drawing on basic psychological theory • Pro’s and con’s of formal mood screens • L.2 – suicide screen • Validating L.1 and L. 2 psychological care

  14. Embedding psychological care • L.1 training as mandatory for all staff involved in stroke care, e.g. Housekeepers, HCA’s, domestics, nursing staff.... • L.2.training for OT’s, physio’s, nursing staff, social workers, rehab practitioners, Dr’s, Stroke Association - group supervision offered to therapy staff on rehab ward and ESD

  15. Thank you • Any questions? Contact details: • Lorna.Roberts@northstaffs.nhs.uk • Margurita.OMara@uhns.nhs.uk • Josephine.Morris@uhns.nhs.uk • Laura.Silitto@uhns.nhs.uk • j.barnes@nhs.net

More Related