1 / 18

Planning and use of funding instruments

Planning and use of funding instruments. Objective 1 1 CSF, with 1 OP per region (or SPD if < 1 billion EURO) funded by the ERDF, ESF, EAGGF-Guidance, FIFG Objective 2 1 SPD per region (NUTS II level) funded by the ERDF, ESF (EAGGF-Guarantee) Objective 3 1 SPD per country

edwardharris
Download Presentation

Planning and use of funding instruments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Planning and use of funding instruments Objective 1 • 1 CSF, with 1 OP per region (or SPD if < 1 billion EURO) • funded by the ERDF, ESF, EAGGF-Guidance, FIFG Objective 2 • 1 SPD per region (NUTS II level) • funded by the ERDF, ESF (EAGGF-Guarantee) Objective 3 • 1 SPD per country • funded by the ESF Community Initiatives: one Fund per Initiative Agenda 2000

  2. Partnership arrangementsA more decentralised cohesion policy • Within the Member States: • a wider definition of the partnerships: • * regional and local authorities and other competent authorities • * economic and social partners • * other competent bodies including NGOs, environmental sector etc. • active involvement of partners in all stages of programming Agenda 2000

  3. Partnership arrangementsA more decentralised cohesion policy • Between the Commission and the Member States • a clear definition of responsibilities with 3 key players • * the Commission • * the programme Management Authority • * the Monitoring Committee Agenda 2000

  4. Programming: 4 main steps 1. Programme guidance issued by the Commission 2. Development plans submitted by Member States after consultation with partners 3. Adoption of strategy by the Commission: • quantified strategic targets • priorities • funding allocations 4. Detailed programming of measures by Management Authority and Monitoring Committees Agenda 2000

  5. Planning and programming timetable • Plans and programmes to cover 7 years (except transition areas) • Plans submitted by Member States within 4 months of list of eligible regions concluded • Commission decision within 5 months of receiving plans: CSF or SPD • Commission decision within 5 months of receiving proposed OPs • Member States to submit Programme Complement within 3 months of approval of SPD or OP Agenda 2000

  6. Requirements of plans and programmes • Regional Developments Plans: • reinforced ex- ante evaluation • Community Support Framework, SPDs: • strategic priorities, financial allocations and methods of implementation….. • SPDs and OPs will no longer contain measures, as they did before • Programme Complement: measures, finance by measure, beneficiaries, publicity actions Agenda 2000

  7. Programming: who does what? (1) Commission: • determines eligible regions and indicative financial allocations • establishes programme guidance • adopts (modifies) programmes only at the level of strategic priorities • monitoring at strategic level • approves large-scale projects (>EURO 50 million) Agenda 2000

  8. Programming: who does what? (2) Member State - Management Authority: • prepares plans • prepares and adopts the programming complement • sub-delegates responsibilities as necessary - global grants • selects projects • prepares annual report • implements the mid-term evaluation • ensures that information and publicity rules are adhered to Agenda 2000

  9. Programming: who does what? (3) Member State - Monitoring Committee • agrees on programming complement • lays down project selection criteria • monitors programme implementation: • proposes programme changes to Management Authority • agrees on proposals to change programming complement • approves mid-term evaluation • agrees annual report Agenda 2000

  10. Additionality “The Funds may not replace public or other equivalent structural expenditure by the Member State” • 3 verifications: ex-ante, mid-term, ex-post • measured against structural expenditures in all Obj. 1 regions (for Obj. 1)... • ...or expenditures on active labour market policies outside Obj. 1 regions (for Objs. 2 and 3) Agenda 2000

  11. Ceilings on co-financing ratesMaximising the leverage • calculated at measure level • general conditions unchanged • new ceilings where substantial revenue generated from infrastructure: • Obj. 1: 40% + 10% for Cohesion Fund states • Obj. 2: 25% • can be 10% higher if not direct grants • and where investment in firms: • Obj. 1: 35% • Obj. 2: 15% • can be 10% higher for SMEs if not direct grants Agenda 2000

  12. Monitoring arrangementsA more transparent implementation • Key annual encounters: • Commission and Management Authority for management questions • Commission and control authorities for control questions • Monitoring of targets for quantified indicators • Mid-term review of implementation • Improved information and publicity system Agenda 2000

  13. Evaluation: a tool for better programming • ex-ante evaluation submitted by Member State with plans; new emphasis on • employment situation • environmental impact • equality between men and women • mid-term evaluation implemented by Managing authority using an independent expert: consequences for reprogramming • ex-post evaluation implemented by European Commission by 2009 Agenda 2000

  14. Financial ManagementCombining simplification and efficiency • automatic annual commitments • automatic de-commitment of unused resources • payment on account of 7% on the adoption of the programme • new system of reimbursements against expenditure incurred • final payment of 5% at closure of programme • flat-rate indexation of 2% built into budget with review for 2004-2006 Agenda 2000

  15. Financial ControlA clearer division of responsibilities • Member States responsible for: • efficient systems for financial control • prevention of irregularities • correction of irregularities • ensuring compliance with Community law • Commission responsible for: • checks on efficiency of financial control systems • consequences: possible suspension or cancellation of payments • organisation of annual meetings Agenda 2000

  16. The performance reserveA new tool to encourage improved performance • 4% of national resources allocated before 31.3.2004 • assessment of programme performance based on: • realisation of aims decided ex-ante • the quality of the programme management • the absorption of EU resources and their leverage effect • choice of indicators by Member State, based on proposals by Commission • Member State proposes successful programmes • allocation of Funds by the Commission Agenda 2000

  17. Closing ongoing programmes • Programmes before 1994 • requests for payments until 31.3.2001 • automatic decommitments until 30.9.2001 • Programmes from period 1994-1999: • requests for payments until 31.3.2003 • automatic decommitments until 30.9.2003 Agenda 2000

  18. Commission implementing decisions • Eligibility of expenditure (article 30) • Use of the EURO (article 33) • Financial control (article 38) • Financial corrections (article 39) • Information and Publicity (article 46) ….others if necessary Agenda 2000

More Related