150 likes | 181 Views
Explore the structure of conditional statements, evaluating their truth values, proving statements false with counterexamples, and modifying statements through converse, inverse, and contrapositive. Learn about postulates regarding points, lines, and planes.
E N D
Structure • If… then… • …if and only if…
Evaluation • All conditional statements, like truth statements are either TRUE or FALSE • In order for a statement to be TRUE, it must ALWAYS be true • In order for a statement to be FALSE, there need only be one case where the statement is false
Structure • If x = 4 then x^2 = 16 • TRUE • If today is a weekday, then today is Monday • FALSE • If mP = 154° then P is acute • FALSE
Structure continued • E. g. “If mA = 42° then A is acute” • HYPOTHESIS: “mA = 42°” • CONCLUSION: “A is acute” • E. g. “If a = 2 then 5a = 10” • HYPOTHESIS: “a = 2” • CONCLUSION: “5a = 10”
Proving a statement FALSE • Only need to provide one case where the statement is false to prove a statement false • Called a counterexample
Counterexamples • If x^2 = 16 then x = 4 (FALSE) • Cex: x = -4 • If A is acute then m A = 14° • Cex: m A = 76° • If three points are coplanar then they are collinear • Cex?
Modifications to Statements • 4 versions of a conditional statement • Original Statement • Converse • Inverse • Contrapositive
Converse • Reverse the order of the hypothesis and conclusion • “If x = 4 then x^2 = 16” becomes • If x^2 = 16 then x = 4 • TRUE or FALSE? • Counterexample? • x = -4
Inverse • Negate, without changing the order, the hypothesis and conclusion • Literally taking the “NOT” • “If x = 4 then x^2 = 16” becomes • If x ≠ 4 then x^2 ≠ 16 • TRUE or FALSE? • Counterexample? • X = -4
Contrapositive • The inverse of the converse • The converse of the inverse • Swap order and negate
Contrapositive continued • “if x = 4 then x^2 = 16” becomes • If x^2 ≠ 16 then x ≠ 4 • TRUE or FALSE? • Counterexample? • It’s TRUE
Find the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of: • If 1 and 2 form a Linear Pair, then 1 and 2 are supplementary. • Converse: If 1 and 2 are supplementary then 1 and 2 form a Linear Pair. • Inverse: If 1 and 2 do not form a Linear Pair then 1 and 2 are not supplementary. • Contrapositive: If 1 and 2 are not supplementary then 1 and 2 do not form a Linear Pair.
Postulates aboutpoints, lines, and planes • Through any 2 distinct points there exists exactly 1 line • A line contains at least 2 points • Through any 3 noncollinear points there exists exaclty 1 plane • A plane contains at least 3 noncollinear points
Postulates aboutpoints, lines, and planes • If 2 distinct points lie in a plane then the line containing them lies in the plane • If 2 distinct planes intersect, then their intersection is a line • So…. • Why aren’t these Theorems? Why can’t we prove/disprove these?