Geochemistry of extremely alkaline ph 12 ground water in slag fill aquifers
Download
1 / 23

- PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 100 Views
  • Uploaded on

Geochemistry of Extremely Alkaline (pH > 12) Ground water in Slag–Fill Aquifers. By Austin Krabbenhoft 11/29/10. Lake Calumet - Chicago. The Problem. Ground water is among the most degraded in Illinois ( Roadcap, Walton, & Bethke, 2005)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '' - ebony


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Geochemistry of extremely alkaline ph 12 ground water in slag fill aquifers

Geochemistry of Extremely Alkaline (pH > 12) Ground water in Slag–Fill Aquifers

By Austin Krabbenhoft

11/29/10


Lake calumet chicago
Lake Calumet - Chicago Slag–Fill Aquifers


The problem
The Problem Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Ground water is among the most degraded in Illinois (Roadcap, Walton, & Bethke, 2005)

  • Has a high pH (>12), high total dissolved solids, and high ammonia (>50 mg/L)

  • High levels of Ba, Cr, Mn

  • Moderate levels of 15 other metals including Pb, Hg, As, and Li


The problem1
The Problem Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Why?

  • Slag wastes used as fill

  • Other harmful waste also used as fill

    • Fly ash

    • Solid industrial wastes

    • Demolition debris

    • Household trash

  • 600 m3 of fill dumped on 150 km2


Other sources of contamination
Other Sources of Contamination Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Leakage from Landfills

  • Spills at hazardous waste-handling facilities

  • Road-salt runoff

  • Illegal dumping


Sampling site
Sampling Site Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Former wetlands filled with steel slag.

  • Water was sampled from an isolated pond fed by diffuse ground water.

  • Land surrounding the site is unvegetated and had never been developed


Sample collection
Sample Collection Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Samples of precipitated calcite and slag were taken

  • Water was collected in the field using a pump and a .45 micron high-capacity filter


Chemical analysis slag
Chemical Analysis - Slag Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Composed of Iron slag & Steel slag

    • Iron slag

      • Ca2MgSi2O7

      • Contains little or no iron

      • Uniform in composition

    • Steel slag

      • Composed of 50% calcium silicates

        • Rakinaite Ca3Si2O7

        • Larnite Ca2SiO4


Weathered products
Weathered Products Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Weathered down to:

    • Rakinaite Ca3Si2O7 + 7H2O → 3Ca2+ + 2H4SiO4 + 6OH-

    • Larnite Ca2SiO4 + 4H2O → 2Ca2+ + H4SiO4 + 4OH-

    • Akermanite Ca2MgSi2O7 + 7H2O → 2Ca2+ + Mg2+ + 2H4SiO4 + 6OH-


Weathered products1
Weathered Products Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Each reaction releases calcium ions and uses protons

  • Creates Ca-OH in the ground water

  • This explains the high alkalinity of the water


Calcium and carbon dioxide
Calcium and Carbon Dioxide Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • Carbonate from rainwater and underlying sands and soils forms CO32-

  • CO32- is the dominate species at a pH of 10

  • When the alkaline water is exposed to atmospheric CO2 the pH is reduced by 4 factors and calcite precipitates


Calcite reactions
Calcite Reactions Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • At high pH

    • CO2 + H2O→2H+ + CO32-

    • Ca2+ + CO32-→CaCO3

  • At neutral pH

    • H+ + CaCO3 → Ca2+ + HCO3-


Geochemical model
Geochemical Model Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • TITLE Before sparging

  • SOLUTION 1

  • pH 11.2 charge

  • temp 14.5

  • pe 4.075

  • units mmol/L

  • Al .012

  • Ba .00023

  • B .0037

  • Cd .00014

  • Ca .82

  • C .33 as CO3-2

  • Cl .093

  • Cu .00052

  • F .053

  • Fe .00016

  • Pb .00036

  • Li .0049

  • Mg .005

  • Mn .00005

  • N .047 as N03-

  • K .69

  • Si .061

  • Na .57

  • Sr .0015

  • S .14 as SO4-2

  • Zn .0089

  • END

  • TITLE After sparging

  • SOLUTION 1

  • pH 11.2 charge

  • temp 14.5

  • pe 4.075

  • units mmol/L

  • Al .012

  • Ba .00023

  • B .0037

  • Cd .00014

  • Ca .82

  • C .33 as CO3-2

  • Cl .093

  • Cu .00052

  • F .053

  • Fe .00016

  • Pb .00036

  • Li .0049

  • Mg .005

  • Mn .00005

  • N .047 as N03-

  • K .69

  • Si .061

  • Na .57

  • Sr .0015

  • S .14 as SO4-2

  • Zn .0089

  • EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES 1

  • O2(g) -0.670976998

  • CO2(g) -3.5

  • END


Geochemical model1
Geochemical Model Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • ----------------------------After----------------------------

  • pH = 8.587

  • pe = 12.965

  • Specific Conductance (uS/cm, 14 oC) = 226

  • Density (g/cm3) = 0.99937

  • Activity of water = 1.000

  • Ionic strength = 3.779e-003

  • Mass of water (kg) = 1.000e+000

  • Total alkalinity (eq/kg) = 2.502e-003

  • Total CO2 (mol/kg) = 2.385e-003

  • Temperature (deg C) = 14.500

  • Electrical balance (eq) = -7.321e-015

  • Percent error, 100*(Cat-|An|)/(Cat+|An|) = -0.00

  • Iterations = 14

  • Total H = 1.110145e+002

  • Total O = 5.551475e+001

  • ----------------------------Before------------------------

  • pH = 11.573

  • pe = 4.075

  • Specific Conductance (uS/cm, 14 oC) = 410

  • Density (g/cm3) = 0.99930

  • Activity of water = 1.000

  • Ionic strength = 3.630e-003

  • Mass of water (kg) = 1.000e+000

  • Total alkalinity (eq/kg) = 2.549e-003

  • Total CO2 (mol/kg) = 3.300e-004

  • Temperature (deg C) = 14.500

  • Electrical balance (eq) = -7.323e-015

  • Percent error, 100*(Cat-|An|)/(Cat+|An|) = -0.00

  • Iterations = 9

  • Total H = 1.110145e+002

  • Total O = 5.550986e+001


Geochemical model2
Geochemical Model Slag–Fill Aquifers

  • ------------------------------Sample---------------------------

  • Phase SI log IAP log KT

  • Calcite 1.34 -7.09 -8.43 CaCO3

  • CO2(g) -8.76 -10.09 -1.33 CO2

  • Dolomite 0.34 -16.49 -16.84 CaMg(CO3)2

  • Fe(OH)3(a) -0.84 4.05 4.89 Fe(OH)3

  • FeS(ppt) -111.47 -115.38 -3.92 FeS

  • O2(g) -24.29 -27.09 -2.81 O2

  • Pb(OH)2 1.14 9.66 8.52 Pb(OH)2

  • Zn(OH)2(e) -0.02 11.48 11.50 Zn(OH)2

  • ------------------------------Sample after sparging------------

  • Phase SI log IAP log KT

  • Calcite 0.69 -7.74 -8.43 CaCO3

  • CO2(g) -3.50 -4.83 -1.33 CO2

  • Dolomite -0.86 -17.69 -16.84 CaMg(CO3)2

  • Fe(OH)3(a) 1.43 6.32 4.89 Fe(OH)3

  • FeS(ppt) -156.37 -160.28 -3.92 FeS

  • O2(g) -0.67 -3.48 -2.81 O2

  • Pb(OH)2 -0.57 7.96 8.52 Pb(OH)2

  • Zn(OH)2(e) -0.55 10.95 11.50 Zn(OH)2


Possible solutions

As an experimental solution atmospheric air was bubbled through 900 mL of site water that contained 100 g of precipitate.

The water was sparged with a glass gas dispersion tube at a constant rate until pH stabilized

Mortality rate went from 100% in the extremely alkaline water to <10%

Possible Solutions


Possible solutions1

Alternatives: through 900 mL of site water that contained 100 g of precipitate.

Sparge the water with 1 atm of CO2

Mix a strong acid like HCl with the water

Pros:

Drops the pH 100 times faster than with atmospheric air

Any additional CO32- or HCl beyond 7 would dissolve the calcite and not affect the pH

Cons:

Those systems can be expensive and labor intensive to set up and monitor

Reduced pH does not necessarily mean more livable.

The toxicity rates were four times higher than in air-sparging

Due to the release of metals as the calcite dissolved

Possible Solutions


My solution
My Solution through 900 mL of site water that contained 100 g of precipitate.

  • Add pyrite to the slag fill and through the following reaction it will make the water more acidic

  • 2 FeS2 (s) + 7 O2 + 2 H2O → 2 Fe2+ (aq) + 4 SO4 (aq) + 4 H+

  • Need .3022 g of FeS2 to neutralize 1 L of sample water


When modeled

TITLE Addition of pyrite through 900 mL of site water that contained 100 g of precipitate.

SOLUTION 1

pH 11.2 charge

temp 14.5

pe .25

units mmol/L

Al .012

Ba .00023

B .0037

Cd .00014

Ca .82

C .33 as CO3-2

Cl .093

Cu .00052

F .053

Fe .00016

Pb .00036

Li .0049

Mg .005

Mn .00005

N .015 as NH4+

O(0) .55

K .69

Si .061

Na .57

Sr .0015

S 1.26 as SO4-2

Zn .0089

END

TITLE Addition of atmospheric air

SOLUTION 1

pH 11.2 charge

temp 14.5

pe 4.075

units mmol/L

Al .012

Ba .00023

B .0037

Cd .00014

Ca .82

C .33 as CO3-2

Cl .093

Cu .00052

F .053

Fe .00016

Pb .00036

Li .0049

Mg .005

Mn .00005

N .047 as N03-

K .69

Si .061

Na .57

Sr .0015

S .14 as SO4-2

Zn .0089

EQUILIBRIUM_PHASES 1

O2(g) -0.670976998

CO2(g) -3.5

END

When Modeled


Modeling results
Modeling Results through 900 mL of site water that contained 100 g of precipitate.

Their Results

My Results

  • ----------------------------Sparging with Air---------------------------

  • pH = 8.587

  • pe = 12.965

  • Specific Conductance (uS/cm, 14 oC) = 226

  • Density (g/cm3) = 0.99937

  • Activity of water = 1.000

  • Ionic strength = 3.779e-003

  • Mass of water (kg) = 1.000e+000

  • Total alkalinity (eq/kg) = 2.502e-003

  • Total CO2 (mol/kg) = 2.385e-003

  • Temperature (deg C) = 14.500

  • Electrical balance (eq) = -7.321e-015

  • Percent error, 100*(Cat-|An|)/(Cat+|An|) = -0.00

  • Iterations = 14

  • Total H = 1.110145e+002

  • Total O = 5.551475e+001

  • ----------------------------Addition of Pyrite---------------------------

  • pH = 7.074

  • pe = 0.250

  • Specific Conductance (uS/cm, 14 oC) = 263

  • Density (g/cm3) = 0.99938

  • Activity of water = 1.000

  • Ionic strength = 4.666e-003

  • Mass of water (kg) = 1.000e+000

  • Total alkalinity (eq/kg) = 3.082e-004

  • Total CO2 (mol/kg) = 3.301e-004

  • Temperature (deg C) = 14.500

  • Electrical balance (eq) = 3.705e-018

  • Percent error, 100*(Cat-|An|)/(Cat+|An|) = 0.00

  • Iterations = 16

  • Total H = 1.110130e+002

  • Total O = 5.551303e+001


Geochemistry of extremely alkaline ph 12 ground water in slag fill aquifers

------------------------------ Addition of Pyrite- ------------------------------

Phase SI log IAP log KT

Alunite 4.31 4.26 -0.06 KAl3(SO4)2(OH)6

Calcite -1.79 -10.22 -8.43 CaCO3

Fe(OH)3(a) -3.67 1.23 4.89 Fe(OH)3

Melanterite -7.68 -10.02 -2.35 FeSO4:7H2O

Pyrite -40.46 -59.24 -18.78 FeS2

Smithsonite -2.32 -12.21 -9.88 ZnCO3

Strontianite -3.68 -12.95 -9.28 SrCO3

Zn(OH)2(e) -2.60 8.90 11.50 Zn(OH)2

------------------------------ Sparging with Air- ------------------------------

Phase SI log IAP log KT

Alunite -6.11 -6.16 -0.06 KAl3(SO4)2(OH)6

Calcite 0.69 -7.74 -8.43 CaCO3

Fe(OH)3(a) 1.43 6.32 4.89 Fe(OH)3

Melanterite -20.78 -23.13 -2.35 FeSO4:7H2O Pyrite -256.73 -275.51 -18.78 FeS2

Smithsonite -0.86 -10.74 -9.88 ZnCO3

Strontianite -1.19 -10.47 -9.28 SrCO3

Zn(OH)2(e) -0.55 10.95 11.50 Zn(OH)2


Problems with my modeling
Problems with my modeling ------------------------------

  • Could not make it work if I added the aqueous Fe I would need to.

  • Doesn’t specify how much FeS2 should be added to the soil .

  • A pH –below 8.1 may have dissolved some calcite and brought more heavy metals into solution.


Citations
Citations ------------------------------

  • Roadcap, S. G., Walton, R. K., Bethke, M. C. (2005). Geochemistry of extremely alkaline (pH > 12) ground water    in slag-fill aquifers Ground Water, 43 (6), 806-816.