1 / 38

MAKING Minority GOVERNMENT WORK

Hung parliaments and the challenges for Westminster and Whitehall. MAKING Minority GOVERNMENT WORK. Report Launch @ Institute for Government 3 December 2009 Robert Hazell, Akash Paun, Mark Chalmers, Ben Yong. About the Project. Constitution Unit and Institute for Government partnership

Download Presentation

MAKING Minority GOVERNMENT WORK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hung parliaments and the challenges for Westminster and Whitehall MAKING Minority GOVERNMENT WORK Report Launch @ Institute for Government 3 December 2009 Robert Hazell, Akash Paun, Mark Chalmers, Ben Yong

  2. About the Project • Constitution Unit and Institute for Government partnership • “The unwritten rules of the game in British politics are deeply intertwined with the assumption that one party will win a clear majority and rule the roost. If that assumption is no longer valid, a very large proportion of the normal conventions of government would come under challenge.” David Butler, Governing without a majority, 1986 • 3 stages of government life cycle • 4 case studies • Lessons for 6 different actors

  3. A norm of single party majority rule? Majority Minority Coalition 1890-99 1900-09 1910-19 1920-29 1930-39 1940-49 1950-59 1960-69 1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09 Labour Liberal National Government Conservative Unionist

  4. Disproportional representation 2005 General Election One seat per 97,000 votes One seat per 44,000 votes One seat per 27,000 votes

  5. A Conservative victory would need a large swing in comparison with recent history What the Conservatives need for a majority in 2010 +6.9 +3.1 2005 2010

  6. There is a wide ‘no man’s land’ between Conservative and Labour majorities Current opinion poll average = c.30 seat Tory majority At the same point in 1996 And the eventual result in 1997 2005 result = 42 seat Labour majority ‘No man’s land’ Labour lead Conservative lead Vote Share Sources: www.ukpollingreport.co.uk and www.electoralcalculus.co.uk

  7. A longer government formation process Source: de Winter, L. (1995), ‘The role of parliament in government formation and resignation’, in Doring, H. (ed), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, p.118.

  8. A range of possible government forms Majority e.g. 1940-45 1979-2009 1979-2004 1999-2007 Pre-1996 1996-1998 • Agreement to disagree • Ministers outside Cabinet • Contract parliamentarism • Confidence agreements Single-Party Multi-Party 1998-9, 2008-9 1999-2008 1974, ‘76-79, ‘97 e.g. 2004-09 2007-2009 Minority

  9. Minority and coalition government: Key tradeoffs • “Coalition (majority) rule makes life difficult within government but simple in parliament. Minority government is the other way around.” • “Minority government is a challenge for the opposition as much as a challenge for government.” • “The absence of a government majority does not imply the existence of an opposition majority.” • “A hung parliament will lead to multi-party governance, even if single party government continues.”

  10. Canada’s Dysfunctional Minority Parliament Canada

  11. Context • A Westminster-type Parliament with 308 MPs elected by the first past the post electoral system. • Queen is Head of State, with powers exercised by Governor General on advice of the PM. • 3 national parties: Conservatives, Liberals, NDP • 1 separatist party: Bloc Québecois

  12. History • 10 minority governments in 20th century, 3 this century • Pure minority government is preferred • Many past minority governments viewed favourably, e.g. Lester Pearson • Current parliament defined by brinksmanship, continuous electioneering, hyperpoliticisation. • September ’08 dissolution; December ’08 prorogation

  13. Three periods of minority governments

  14. Key Lessons • Politicians need to make parliament work, avoid calling on the Monarch. • Be consultative and cooperative not unilateral. • Civil service must be prepared for possibility of coalition and other forms of multiparty governance. • Media plays role in educating and shaping attitudes

  15. New Zealand’s Experience of Multi-Party Governance New Zealand

  16. In Brief • Minority government can work, provided there is: • Preparation • Careful and sensible management • Adaptability and flexibility

  17. NZ Governments, 1996-2009 by regular Cabinet participation

  18. Key problems • Government formation • Multiparty management

  19. Government Formation • Crown: • pre-emptive diplomacy • Civil service: • set out rules in advance • Political parties: • flexibility; multi-party arrangements

  20. NZ Governments, 1996-2009 by executive responsibilities

  21. Management • Multiparty management: • Sensible and careful management • The unity-distinctiveness dilemma: • Be flexible

  22. Learning from Scotland’s Parliament of Minorities Scotland

  23. Scottish constitutional context • Part of the Westminster family: the same fundamental relationship between government and parliament, ministers and civil service, party leaders and backbenchers. A similar party system and media environment. • But with significant differences.... • An aspiration for ‘a new politics’ of power-sharing, inclusiveness and accountability. • A proportional electoral system and multi-party politics. • Fixed term parliaments • Parliamentary procedures designed to strengthen the legislature, e.g. committees’ role in legislative process.

  24. Three elections, three minority parliaments Liberal Democrats Others Labour Conservatives SNP

  25. A decade of multi-party governance • Government formed within two weeks of each election, with some teething problems in 1999. • 1999-2007, stable coalition majority government based on detailed ‘Partnership Agreement’ and collective responsibility. • 2007 – SNP become the largest party for first time (by one seat). Despite narrowness of result, election viewed as SNP victory. • SNP minority government formed, with limited Green support. • First two and a half years of minority rule have seen a slowdown in legislation, plus frequent government defeats in Parliament. • But only one government bill has been lost; most defeats have been on non-binding motions and legislative amendments. • 2009 Budget was initially defeated, triggering talk of crisis, but this was resolved in a week, with concessions offered to the opposition.

  26. Key lessons from Scotland • Formal coalition can be constraining, and may undermine the smaller party’s identity. • A coalition majority government can dominate parliament like a single party administration at Westminster. • Minority government increases uncertainty in parliament, but permits a clearer strategic vision and more flexibility. • A minority government needs to manage expectations, downplay significance of defeats, build relationships with opposition parties, and be prepared to compromise (on policy, spending and agenda). • But government is able to retain dominance of the legislative, budgetary and policy-making process. • Minority rule can lead to (perceived) politicisation of the civil service. • To critics, SNP is populist and unaccountable. To defenders, the current parliament represents grown-up, inclusive decision-making.

  27. Lessons for Westminster, Whitehall and the Crown Making it work

  28. Lessons for Prime Minister and government • Do not govern in a majoritarian way • Accept likelihood of frequent parliamentary defeats • Prepare media and public for these defeats, so not seen as issues of confidence • Set out clear strategy and long term goals • When advising the Crown, put aside party interest

  29. Civil Service must be prepared • For caretaker government, with clear caretaker convention • To support negotiations between the parties • For different possible combinations of minority and/or coalition government • For relaxation of collective Cabinet responsibility, but not confidentiality • To develop a clear set of rules to which all players subscribe

  30. Lessons for Parliament • Parliament cannot make policy, or force government to do anything against its will • Implement Wright Committee proposals to relax government domination of the timetable • Government legislation won’t diminish. But its passage will take longer, and it will be more heavily amended • Budget still dominated by government. Opposition parties will negotiate changes, need expert support • Contested procedural rulings, pressure on Speaker

  31. Lessons for the opposition parties • Lack of government majority does not mean there is an opposition majority • Difficult to coordinate ‘the opposition’ against the government, or bring government down • Minority government forces opposition parties to behave responsibly: they determine which measures pass • Can influence government policy through bilateral deals • Hold out for stronger research and policy support

  32. Lessons for the Crown • Mystique about government formation risks drawing Crown into controversy • Need clear rules to explain it is not Monarch’s role to form a government, or facilitate negotiations • Decision to form a government must be reached by politicians • PM then advises who can command confidence • Investiture vote to elect new PM would be more direct test of confidence than Queen’s Speech

  33. Minority government can work if... • The government does not seek to govern in a majoritarian way • The civil service understands the rules of the new political game, and codifies them into a new rule book • Parliament becomes a forum in which the government builds legislative coalitions with different parties on different issues • The opposition parties are encouraged to behave responsibly, and supported in parliament to do so • The media also understand the new political game, and do not depict minority government as nasty, disputatious and short

  34. Backup slides

  35. Four ideal types of government Majority Single-Party Multi-Party Minority

  36. Single party majority rule as the norm?

  37. Two party dominance has declined

  38. Challenges for the executive

More Related