1 / 16

(Once again) The n_TOF-Ph2 neutron fluence (2010)

(Once again) The n_TOF-Ph2 neutron fluence (2010) C. Guerrero (CERN), M. Barbagallo (INFN/Bari), A. Tsinganis (CERN), N. Colona (INFN/Bari), E Mendoza (CIEMAT) et al. Situation in the last meeting (April 2011) and plan.

early
Download Presentation

(Once again) The n_TOF-Ph2 neutron fluence (2010)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. (Once again) The n_TOF-Ph2 neutron fluence (2010) C. Guerrero (CERN), M. Barbagallo (INFN/Bari), A. Tsinganis (CERN), N. Colona (INFN/Bari), E Mendoza (CIEMAT) et al.

  2. Situation in the last meeting (April 2011) and plan • SiMon and MGAS-B10 seem to be in good agreements up to at least 10 keV. • High energy limit for SiMon and MGAS-B10 not clear. • Analysis conditions (amp. cuts) to be studied in detail. • (PTB+MGAS-U5) in 6-9% disagreement wrt (SiMon+MGAS-B10) in ~7-100 keV • FLUKA+MCNP simulation in overall agreement with data, except in the Al dips and above ~600 keV (~5% difference) • […] Review the full analysis -Transmission through material along the beam. - Analysis conditions for the analysis of each detector - Detection efficiency dependence with En of each detector - Identify high energy limit of each detector - Corrections from transmission through the material along the beam - Correction of t0 for TOF/En conversion Complete FLUKA+MCNP simulations

  3. Expected reaction yield (transmission ≠ 1) Detailed MCNP simulations by Emilio Mendoza (CIEMAT) [n_TOF-INT-2011-001] 182.2 m 183.25 m 182.9 m 60 mm Ta windows (0.15mm) Ta electrodes (0.125mm) Air (7 cm) Air (20 cm) MGAS (30 cm) [ONLY IN 2009] Ar (1 atm) 45 cm Ar (1 atm) n B U Li Pt electrodes (0.125mm) 235U samples (444 mg/cm2 (total 201.4 mg in 76 mm diameter deposits) Al window (500mm) Kapton windows (50 mm each ) Li = Mylar (1.5mm, 1.4 g/cm3) + C (0.045 mm, 2.15 g/cm3) + 6Li (6 mm, 0.5 g/cm3) + C (0.045 mm, 2.15 g/cm3) B = Kapton (25mm,1.42 g/cm3) + Cu(2mm,8.94 g/cm3) + 10B4C (2mm,2.52g/cm3) + Cu (5mm,8.94 g/cm3) + Kapton (25mm,1.42 g/cm3) + Cu (5mm,8.94 g/cm3) U = Al(20mm,2.7 g/cm3) + 235UF4(0.47mm,6.7 g/cm3) + Cu (5mm,8.94g/cm3 )+ Kapton (50mm , 1.42g/cm3) + Cu(5mm,8.94 g/cm3)

  4. Expected reaction yield (transmission ≠ 1)

  5. MGAS-10B: Selection cuts and Hi-En limit 1-100 eV 0.1-1 keV 1-10 keV 10-30 keV 30-100 keV 100-300 keV Selection cut: MGASamp > 62.5 + 5.277e-5*En + 3.83e11*En2 300-500 keV

  6. MGAS-10B: detection efficiency MGAS sees only those a’s emitted FORWARD Angular distribution has an effect!! F. J. Hambsch, I. Ruskov, Nucl. Sc. and Eng. 163 1 (2009) 1-16 “The 10B(n,0)7Li and 10B(n,1)7Li Alpha-Particle Angular Distributions for En < 1 MeV” Efficiency calculated as ratio of forward to background emission prob. 9%

  7. SiMon: Selection cuts and Hi-En limit Amplitude cut depends on the neutron energy 10-100 eV 100-1000 eV 1-10 keV 10-100 keV 100-300 keV 300-500 keV Because of Ang. Distr., efficiency depends also on neutron energy (very large correction above 10-20 keV)

  8. Comparison MGAS(10B) & SiMon (6Li) ±3%

  9. Summary and strategy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thermal All measurements normalized to PTB (235U) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Below 25 keV 6Li and 10B cross sections: standard (and smooth) cross sections! 235U cross section: non standard + non-smooth URR SiMon & MGAS(10B) in good agreement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 -150 keV 235U cross section: Point-wise without resonant/interference effects SiMon has larger uncertainty due to Ang. Distr. (but it is in better agreement with PTB than MGAS) FLUKA+MCNP simulation available for helping resolve the Al dips (normalized at 10 keV) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 150-250 keV 235U, 6Li and 10B cross sections: standard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Above 250 keV Both SiMon and MGAS start having problems (statistics, g-flash, recoils,…) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  10. The evaluated neutron fluence (2010) [update wrt that of /afs/]

  11. The evaluated neutron fluence (2010): thermal to 25 keV

  12. The evaluated neutron fluence (2010): 25 to 250 keV

  13. The evaluated neutron fluence (2010): 250 keV to 1 MeV

  14. The evaluated neutron fluence (2010): 10 keV to 1 MeV

  15. Actually, it is not so nice..... Main open questions are: PTB disagrees ~8-25 keV (10%) Simulation disagrees ~1-10 keV (5%) MGAS dips too “small”! (10-20%) TOF/E relation pending!

  16. The evaluated n_TOF-Ph2 2010 neutron fluence: version (final-1)

More Related