1 / 14

Rescaling NDVI from the VEGETATION instrument into apparent fraction cover for dryland studies

Rescaling NDVI from the VEGETATION instrument into apparent fraction cover for dryland studies E. Bartholomé*, P. Bogaert † , M. Cherlet°, P. Defourny † , P. Mathoux † , P. Vogt* * Joint Research Centre Ispra † Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve °FAO - Rome. The problem.

eakins
Download Presentation

Rescaling NDVI from the VEGETATION instrument into apparent fraction cover for dryland studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rescaling NDVI from the VEGETATION instrument into apparent fraction cover for dryland studies E. Bartholomé*, P. Bogaert†, M. Cherlet°, P. Defourny†, P. Mathoux†, P. Vogt* * Joint Research Centre Ispra †Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve °FAO - Rome

  2. The problem • In arid regions soil is a major component of the NDVI signal • Time series keep atmospheric contamination and angular effects • A biophysical measurement is more explicit than an index

  3. Bare soil Yearly NDVI average over bare soils shows a high degree of variability

  4. If NDVI is never < 0.2, NDVI bare soil is set to 0.1, i. e. close to most frequent • average bare soil NDVI value Solution: an original per-pixel adjustment procedure Iterative procedure to eliminate vegetated pixels in temporal profile • Values above a threshold defined according to a gaussian probability function are eliminated • The iterative process stops when difference between previous and current averages <1%

  5. Bare soil NDVI offset correction

  6. Adjustment to the max cover • NDVImax = 0.85≈ Covermax • Defined from the time series over the whole window

  7. Max cover in 2000 0% 50% 100%

  8. Meaning of the new product NDVI – fractional cover relationship is well documented in the literature For VEGETATION data this translates into: For pixels where bare soil value cannot be measured

  9. assumptions LAI>3  cover ≈ fPAR Both models and statistical fitting indicate that the relationship is not linear, But linear assumption is usually considered as sufficient for low res. applications

  10. Identification of vegetated pixels • Based on the analysis of NDVI variation on bare soils, a pixel is declared vegetated if NDVI >NDVIbare soil + 2% cover • To further reduce the risk of contamination, pixels are retained as vegetated if they were identified as vegetated on the previous product

  11. Time-series smoothing • 5th degree Polynomial applied on periods of 21 decades • Iterative process (7 cycles) to replace low NDVI values by polynomial values • 5-decade overlap between periods • At the end the highest NDVI value is retained (polynomial or actual value)

  12. Jebel Haruj es Sawda Tibesti Known limitations sparse vegetation or bare soil • High NDVI variability over some dark (volcanic) surfaces (above the normal threshold)

  13. ? Known limitations – dense vegetation Residual atmospheric effects

  14. conclusions • The fractional cover makes the data interpretation easy for land cover mapping in arid regions • Procedure easily implementable for inter-instrument data comparison • Soil effects are well removed, marginal improvement to be implemented • Needs further improvement for regions with high aerosol load.

More Related