1 / 22

ICANN ASO AC Report to ARIN Public Policy Mtg

ICANN ASO AC Report to ARIN Public Policy Mtg. http://www.aso.icann.org/ Cathy Wittbrodt Thanks to Hans Petter Holen and Sabine Jaume. Address Council members. AC appointments to the board. Name Term Region (years)

eagan
Download Presentation

ICANN ASO AC Report to ARIN Public Policy Mtg

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ICANN ASO ACReport to ARIN Public Policy Mtg http://www.aso.icann.org/Cathy WittbrodtThanks to Hans Petter Holen and Sabine Jaume

  2. Address Council members

  3. AC appointments to the board Name Term Region (years) Rob Blokzijl 3 Europe Pindar Wong 1 Asia Pacific Ken Fockler 2 Americas

  4. Call for Nominations • One ICANN board term will expire inSeptember • Call for nominations has been sent. • Responses required before April 19th.

  5. ASO functions • Address Council • ASO Open meetings (General Assembly) • Secretariat

  6. Mailing Lists • aso-announce@aso.icann.org Usedby the ASO to make announcements relating to ASO news,policy developments, meetings, and calls for comment.Subscription open to all• aso-policy@aso.icann.orgThis list is intended to provide the major public discussionforum for the ASO, and it is open to all participants, in linewith the ASO MoU. Subscription open to all.• aso-comment@aso.icann.orgThis list is to provide a general open forum where anyinterested party may comment on any aspects of the ASO'spolicies or procedures. Subscription open to all

  7. Timetable • 1999-08-26 ICANN accepted proposal• 1999-10-18 MOU (ready to be) Signed• 1999-10-19 Complete address council selected• 1999-10-22 Nominations to ICANN dir. From RIRs• 1999-10-25 AC phone conf. Selection of directors @0700-1400-2300• 1999-11-01 AC informal meeting• 1999-11-02 AC open meeting• 1999-11-03 MOU Signed at ICANN open meeting• 2000-01-23 Phone conf – not properly called for• 2000-02-15 Phone conf – did not reach a quorum• 2000-02-16 electronic vote #1• 2000-03-02 Phone conf• 2000-05-19 Budapest ASO General Assembly Meeting

  8. Open AC meeting 1999-11-02 • Welcome & Introduction• Selection of AC Chair• Review of ASO board member terms• Review of functions• AC meetings• Calendar included 1st General Assembly• Review of Ad Hoc meeting• Open floor – AOB• Minutes @ http://aso.icann.org/mailing-lists/aso-policy/9912/msg00000.html

  9. AC phone conf 2000-01-23 • 0) Administrative• 1) Status of the meeting.• 2) Openness and Procedures for the AC• 3) Case study of the above• 4) Draft Answer to Mike Roberts• 5) Further meetings• 6) Review of Action list• 7) ad Hoc Group Agenda• Minutes to be posted shortly

  10. AC phone conf 2000-02-15 • As we were only 4 AC members, we did not reachthe quorum : we postponed the formal meeting.• We had a 20 minutes informal discussion about :- possibility to use rotating conf call numbers- attending the 17/02 conf call on At Largemembership : RB will attend- process on elections- Calgary AC meeting to decide quickly

  11. Electronic vote # 1 Request No:   2000-1Title: ASO General meeting 2000Decision: The General assembly meeting is to be held in Budapest on Friday 2000-05-19 1400Supplementary Decision: put this procedure on the webpageAttached Document: Background materialType: regularStart: 2000-02-16Deadline:  2000-02-18Charge: Hans PetterHolen

  12. Background • 1) At the Los Angeles meeting the AC was ready to makea decision on when and where to host the meeting. TheRIRs asked us to let them come up with a proposal.• 2) After consultation the RIRs agreed to offer the RIPEmeeting in Budapest as the site for theASO general meeting.• 3) To the chairs knowledge this decision has beensupported by Cathy, Dave, Wilfried, Arano, Sabine andHPH.• 4) This call for a vote is to finally settle the decision in aformal way.The RIPE meeting schedule for Budapest:http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/current/ripe-35/index.html#plan

  13. Result • All in favour

  14. Conclusion: • We should move forward and seek to makeemail votes part of the formal desicionmechanisms of the Address Council

  15. AC meeting 2000-03-02 • Decision on 1st version of ASO procedures• Decision to make e-mail voting procedure thestandard decision mechanism• Followup on messages to the AC/ASO• RIR/IANA relation ship and AC involvement inpolicy related parts of these contracts• Egypt meeting presentation• Physical AC meeting in Budapest• Endorsement of the ASO open meeting decision

  16. Primary goals for the AC • Move forward • On address policy issues; give the ICANNboard technically solid advice based on theinput from the open regional process • Build strong relations to ICANN and ourcommunity through the Regional Policyfora.

  17. Conference call about At Large Membership • February 17th• Hosted by the Center for Democracy andTechnology and Common Cause• These groups are studying the At Largemembership from a public interest perspective.• Attendees: Kim Hubbard, Hans PetterHolen,RaimundoBeca, Takashi Arano, Lusan Chua,Cathy Wittbrodt

  18. Agenda for Conference Call • What would be the ideal result of an AtLarge election for the ASO?• Do you agree or disagree with the currentelection rules? Please describe why youagree or disagree.• Do you have ideas for how the At Largeelection might be improved?

  19. Discussion Summary • There were concerns that the At Large directorsmay not have the technical expertise to understandissues important to IP address space• Checks and balances• Concern that technical community is not involvedenough in the ICANN process, further that the“SOs” should have greater authority in their areaof expertise.• Online report is available:www.commoncause.org/icann or www.cdt.org/dns

  20. Independent Review Panel • In Cairo ICANN approved an IndependentReview Panel.• http://www.icann.org/indreview/policy.htm• The IRP will decide whether an action ofthe ICANN Board is consistent with itsBylaws and Articles of Incorporation

  21. Requirements of IRP Members • A nominee to the IRP should be a person of highprofessional standing and accomplishment.• A nominee to the IRP should be (i) a current orformer judge, and/or (ii) an individual with legaltraining who would qualify for judicialappointment and who has experience conductingarbitration or a similar dispute resolutionproceeding.• A nominee to the IRP must hold no other officeor position within the ICANN structure.

  22. Nominating CommitteeResponsibilities • The nominating committee will nominate 9individuals to serve on the Review Panel.• ASO AC to nominate two of its members toserve on an Independent ReviewNominating Committee• Other members of the Nominatingcommittee will be selected by the otherSupporting Organizations

More Related