150 likes | 283 Views
This document provides a detailed exploration of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) techniques for comparing three or more groups within a multigroup experimental design. It elaborates on the purposes of ANOVA, including testing complex hypotheses and leveraging larger sample sizes. The text covers practical procedures such as defining groups, operationalizing metrics, and coding methods including dummy and contrast coding. It also discusses constructing hypotheses, analyzing variance tables, and understanding power calculations, making it essential for researchers in various fields.
E N D
Multigroup experimental design • PURPOSES: • COMPARE 3 OR MORE GROUPS SIMULTANEOUSLY • TAKE ADVANTAGE OF POWER OF LARGER TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE • CONSTRUCT MORE COMPLEX HYPOTHESES THAT BETTER REPRESENT OUR PREDICTIONS
Multigroup experimental design • PROCEDURES • DEFINE GROUPS TO BE STUDIES: • Experimental Assignment VS • Intact or Existing Groups • OPERATIONALIZE NOMINAL, ORDINAL, OR INTERVAL/RATIO MEASUREMENT OF GROUPS • eg. Nominal: SPECIAL ED, LD, AND NON-LABELED • Ordinal: Warned, Acceptable, Exemplary Schools • Interval: 0 years’, 1 years’, 2 years’ experience
Multigroup experimental design • PATH REPRESENTATION Ry.T e Treat y
Multigroup experimental design • VENN DIAGRAM REPRESENTATION Treat SS SSy R2=SStreat/SSy SSerror SStreat
Multigroup experimental design • dummy coding. Since the values are arbitrary we can use any two numerical values, much as we can name things arbitrarily- 0 or 1 A or B • Another nominal assignment of values is 1 and –1, called contrast coding: -1 = control, 1=experimental group Compares exp. with control: 1(E) -1(C)
Multigroup experimental design • NOMINAL: If the three are simply different treatments or conditions then there is no preferred labeling, and we can give them values 1, 2, and 3 • Forms: • arbitrary (A,B,C) • interval (1,2,3) assumes interval quality to groups such as amount of treatment • Contrast (-2, 1, 1) compares groups • Dummy (1, 0, 0), different for each group
Dummy Coding Regression Vars • Subject Treatment x1 x2 y • 01 A 1 0 17 • 02 A 1 0 19 • 03 B 0 1 22 • 04 B 0 1 27 • 05 C 0 0 33 • 06 C 0 0 21
Contrast Coding Regression Vars • Subject Treatment x1 x2 y • 01 A 1 0 17 • 02 A 1 0 19 • 03 B 0 1 22 • 04 B 0 1 27 • 05 C -1 -1 33 • 06 C -1 -1 21
Hypotheses about Means • The usual null hypothesis about three group means is that they are all equal: • H0 : 1 = 2 = 3 • while the alternative hypothesis is typically represented as • H1 : ij for some i,j .
ANOVA TABLE • SOURCE df Sum of Mean F Squares Square • Treatment… k-1 SStreat SStreatSStreat/ k (k-1) SSe /k(n-1) • error k(n-1) SSe SSe / k(n-1) • total kn-1 SSy SSy / (n-1) • Table 9.2: Analysis of variance table for Sums of Squares
F-DISTRIBUTION Central F-distribution power alpha Fig. 9.5: Central and noncentral F-distributions
POWER for ANOVA • Power nomographs- available from some texts on statistics • Simulations- tryouts using SPSS • requires creating a known set of differences among groups • best understanding using means and SDs comparable to those to be used in the study • post hoc results from previous studies are useful; summary data can be used
ANOVA TABLE QUIZ SOURCE DF SS MS F PROB GROUP 2 ___ 50 __ .05 ERROR __ ___ ___ TOTAL 20 R2 = ____