2009-2010 Institutional Reaccreditation Review August 29, 2008 College of Pharmacy, Nursing, and Health Sciences Faculty Meeting. Christine Ladisch, Project Director Mark A. Pagano, Project Co-Director. Review occurs every ten years Last review was in 1999-2000
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
2009-2010Institutional Reaccreditation ReviewAugust 29, 2008College of Pharmacy, Nursing, and
Health Sciences Faculty Meeting
Christine Ladisch, Project Director
Mark A. Pagano, Project Co-Director
Last review was in 1999-2000
Purdue continually accredited since 1913
Maintain the institution’s eligibility to receive federal funds for student financial aid.
Assure the quality of the institution and its programs through enforcement of financial and administrative standards.
Encourage improvement of the institution and its programs.
Promote institutional accountability and provide consumers with information about the institution.Purpose:
Institutional funds for student financial aid.
national (e.g., religious or trade schools)
focuses on a discipline
(e.g., engineering, business)
Types of Accreditation
There is no national, centralized “Ministry of Education” to enforce academic standards.
The Higher Learning Commission, which is part of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, has legal authority from the Department of Education to accredit colleges and universities.
HLC accreditation is based on a peer review process.
North Central region – 19 states, 980 colleges/universities
Criterion One: Mission and Integrity
Criterion Two: Preparing for the Future
Criterion Three: Student Learning and Effective Teaching
Criterion Four: Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge
Criterion Five: Engagement and Service
Criteria now place a much greater emphasis on assessment of student learning, efforts toward institutional improvement, and determining the impact of the institution on the common good.
Based on the evidence, what needs to be changed to improve learning, and how are you going to achieve these changes?Assessment of Student Learning
Option to participate in HLC’s new Academy for Assessment of Student Learning.
Option to frame self-study around a special emphasis.
Self-study is more evaluative, rather than descriptive. It should be focused more on the future rather than on past accomplishments.
Changes in Process/Study since 2000:
What hasn’t changed since 1999/2000 review? of Student Learning.
Initiate a strategic planning process as the new President assumes the helm.
Make the budgetary process increasingly transparent through sharing info about, and seeking comment on, sources of funds and funding priorities and allocations.
Prepare to launch a major development campaign with a goal no less lofty of other major public institutions. Process should be driven by academic priorities and guided centrally.
Advice from HLC in 1999/2000
Continue commitment to sustained investment in research infrastructure.
Grow commercialization technology efforts.
Centralize management of information technology – hire a world-class CIO.
Increase tuition/fees to support academic programming.Advice from HLC continued….
1999-2000 HLC advice heeded – and then some! infrastructure.
Fall 2007 – appointed leadership team and developed a plan and outline for the self-study.
Chris Ladisch, Project Director
Mark Pagano, Co-Director
Fall 2007 – determined special emphasis theme for self-study – Synergies Across the Disciplines.
Preparing for 2009/2010 Review
In-depth attention to a select group of issues critical to the institution’s pursuit of continuous improvement and educational excellence, especially as they pertain to the achievement of its mission and vision.
Ideal if emphasis fits within strategic plans/goals.
Must have prior HLC approval. (Received)The Self-Study Emphasis:
Tailors self-study to institutional needs and priorities. the institution’s pursuit of continuous improvement and educational excellence, especially as they pertain to the achievement of its mission and vision.
Increases campus interest in self-study.
Report is focused and more interesting to the review team.
Allows greater flexibility in selection of site review team.Advantages of a Self-Study Emphasis:
Indiana University: globalization the institution’s pursuit of continuous improvement and educational excellence, especially as they pertain to the achievement of its mission and vision.
Iowa State: undergraduate education
Michigan State: internationalization
Nebraska: strategic planning
Central Michigan: seeking national prominence
University of Chicago: research infrastructure
Ohio State: graduate and professional education
University of California Riverside: improving undergraduate student engagement; the first year experience; learning outcomesSelf-Study Emphasis Examples:
Joined HLC Assessment Academy.
Joined Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA)
Learning from Purdue faculty and staff serving as HLC peer reviewers.
Learning from recent reviews of Big 10 peers.
Informing and engaging campus in review activities.
Appointed self-study team.
Attended HLC workshop for self-study coordinators.
Preparing for 2009/2010 continued…
Accreditation Steering Committee activities.
This group will oversee the entire accreditation process including planning, self-study (SS) preparation, actual visit, and visit follow-up. A co-chair from each of the 5 criterion and the special emphasis task force will serve.
5 Criterion Committees
Each of these committees is charged with reporting evidence related to their respective section of the SS in light of the special emphasis. These five sections will focus on accomplishments during 1999-2009 and future plans.
Special Emphasis Committee
This committee is charged with looking at the progress of the University from 1999-2009 and reporting to the SS document committee its findings regarding University progress related to the emphasis (SS Chapter V). A second task will be to shadow the parallel strategic planning effort and formulate an overview of how the University will continue to address the special emphasis in the future in light of the 5 criteria (SS Chapter VI).
Self-Study Document Committee
This group will operationalize the work of the six other committees and will oversee the actual SS formation.Self-Study Governance
David Williams, Professor, Veterinary Medicine, Representative to the University Faculty Senate
Julie Rosa, Director, University Periodicals
Andrew Koch,Director, Student Access, Transition and Success Programs, Student Services Representative
AlysaRollock (Criterion 1 Co-Chair), Vice President for Human Relations
Craig Svensson (Criterion 2 Co-Chair), Dean, Pharmacy, Nursing, and Health Sciences
Barbara Dixon (Criterion 3 Co-Chair), Associate Dean, Liberal Arts
Melissa Dark (Criterion 4 Co-Chair), Assistant Dean for Planning and Research, Technology and Professor, Computer and Information Technology
Jay Akridge (Criterion 5 Co-Chair), Interim Dean, Agriculture
Patricia Hart (Special Emphasis Task Force Co-Chair), Professor, Foreign Languages and Literature, Liberal Arts
LorindaSorensen, Support, Office of the ProvostNCA Accreditation Steering Committee
Chair: ChrisLadisch, Vice Provost for Academic Affairs
Co-Chair: MarkPagano, Dean, Continuing Education and Conferences,
Current HLC/NCA Peer Review Corp Member
Co-Chair activities. : AlysaRollock, Vice President for Human Relations
(Steering Committee Rep)
Co-Chair : Bernard Engel, Department Head and Professor, Agricultural and Biological Engineering (Subcommittee Convener)
StephenAkers, Executive Associate Dean, Dean of Students
Diane Denis, Senior Associate Dean, Management
Margaret Grogan, CSSAC, Secretary, Engineering Administration
Jeffrey Gunsher, APSAC, Associate Director Industry Relations, Vice President for Research
KlodKokini, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Engineering
SuzanneNielsen, Department Head and Professor, Food Science
Amy Penner, Graduate Student, Agricultural and Biological Engineering
HowardWeiss, Department Head and Professor, Psychological SciencesCriterion 1 Task ForceMission and Integrity
Co-Chair activities.: CraigSvensson, Dean, Pharmacy, Nursing, and Health Sciences (Steering Committee Rep)
Co-Chair: JohnSautter, Vice President for Housing and Food Services (Subcommittee Convener)
NancyBulger, Assistant Provost
JohnCollier, Director of Campus Planning, Office of University Architect
ThomasGanz, Assistant Director Employee Relations and HR Policy, Human Resource Services
JonathanHarbor, Interim Dean, Science, and Professor, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Richard Kuhn, Department Head and Professor, Biological Sciences
JoanMarshall, Senior Associate Dean, Liberal Arts
RabindraMukerjea, Director of Strategic Planning and Assessment, Office of the President
JamesMullins, Dean, Libraries
Teri Reed-Rhoads, Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Education and Associate Professor, Engineering Education, Engineering
KenSandel, Managing Director, Executive Vice President and TreasurerCriterion 2 Task ForcePreparing for the Future
Co-Chair activities.:BarbaraDixon, Associate Dean, Liberal Arts (Steering Committee Rep)
Co-Chair:CraigBeyrouty, Department Head and Professor, Agronomy (Subcommittee Convener)
HansAagard, Graduate Student, Curriculum and Instruction, Education
SusanAufderheide, Director, Undergraduate Studies Program
GaryBertoline, Assistant Dean for Graduate Studies, Technology
JohnCampbell, Associate Vice President Rosen Center for Adv. Computing, ITaP
Audeen Fentiman, Associate Dean and Professor, Nuclear Engineering
MarneHelgesen, Director, Center for Instructional Excellence
JaneKirkpatrick, Interim Head, Nursing, and Associate Professor, Nursing
Daniel Kopp, Undergraduate Student, Management
GeraldLynch, Professor, Economics and Academic Director of Full-Time Master’s Programs, Management
HeatherStout, Associate Dean, Dean of StudentsCriterion 3 Task Force Student Learning and Effective Teaching
Co-Chair activities.: Melissa Dark, Assistant Dean for Planning and Research, Technology, and Professor, Computer and Information Technology (Steering Committee Rep)
Co-Chair: GeorgeWodicka, Department Head and Professor, Biomedical Engineering (Subcommittee Convener)
RobertBill, Professor, Basic Medical Sciences, Veterinary Medicine
JeanChmielewski, Associate Dean for Graduate Education and International Programs, Science
PeterDunn, Associate Vice President Research and Director of University Research Administration and Compliance
James Fleet, Professor, Foods and Nutrition, Consumer and Family Sciences
JeffreyGilger, Associate Dean for Discovery and Faculty Development, Education
David Janes, Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering
PabloMalavenda, Associate Dean of Student Activities/Organizations, Dean of Students
GitaRamaswamy, Associate Dean, Graduate School
StevenWitz, Director, Regenstrief CenterCriterion 4 Task Force Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge
Co-Chair activities.: JayAkridge, Interim Dean, Agriculture (Steering Committee Rep)
Co-Chair: KathryneNewton, Department Head and Professor, Industrial Technology (Subcommittee Convener)
Robert Bennett, Director of Pharmacy Continuing Education and Professor, Pharmacy Practice
Kirk Cerny, Executive Director and CEO, Purdue Alumni Association
Karen Diamond, Professor, Child Development and Family Studies, Consumer and Family Sciences
Michael Eddy, Director, Continuing Education
Christian Foster, Director, Discovery Park K-12 Programs
Dale Harris, Director, Engineering Professional Education
Charles Hibberd, Director, Cooperative Extension Service and Associate Dean, Agriculture
Elizabeth Liley, Director, University Foundation Relations, University Development
David McKinnis, Director, Technical Assistance Program and Associate Vice Provost for Engagement
JulieNovak, Professor, Nursing, and Director, Purdue School of Nursing Clinics
Shirley Rose, Professor, English, Liberal Arts
William Walker, Director of Outreach, EngagementCriterion 5 Task ForceEngagement and Service
Co-Chair activities.: Patricia Hart, Professor, Foreign Languages and Literature, Liberal Arts (Steering Committee Rep)
Co-Chair: Nicholas Giordano, Department Head and Hubert James Distinguished Professor, Physics (Subcommittee Convener)
Susan Curtis*, Professor, History, Liberal Arts
Sarah Diaz, Undergraduate Student, Management
Michael Harris, Associate Dean, Undergraduate Education and Professor, Chemical Engineering
Robert May, Professor, History, Liberal Arts
Beth McNeil, Associate Dean, Information Resources and Scholarly Communication, Libraries
John Nemz, Undergraduate Student, Management
Timothy Newby, Professor, Curriculum and Instruction, Education
Chris Sahley, Associate Dean, Undergraduate Education, Science
Eric Stach, Associate Professor, Materials Engineering
Jon Story, Interim Dean, Graduate School and Professor, Foods and Nutrition
Abe Walton, Graduate Student, Organizational Leadership and Supervision, Technology
*Liaison to corresponding University strategic planning groupSpecial Emphasis Task Force Synergies Across the Disciplines
KyleBowen, Manager Informatics, IT Teaching and Learning Technologies
JamesGardner, Communications Coordinator/Writer/Editor, Continuing Education and Conferences
ChrisLadisch, ex officio, Vice Provost for Academic Affairs
Jim McCammack, Assistant Director for Graphic Design, Purdue Marketing Communications
Amira Zamin, College of Science Communications Coordinator, Purdue Marketing Communications
KathyGreenwood, Support, Continuing Education and ConferencesSelf-Study Document Committee
Chair: MarkPagano, Dean, Continuing Education and Conferences and Professor, Mechanical Engineering Technology,
Co-Chair: JacqueFrost, Director, Office of Institutional Research
II. Footprint on the Prairie: Purdue University 1869-1899
III. A Century of Progress: Purdue University 1900-1999
IV. Moving Toward Preeminence: 1999-2009
a. Responding to the Previous NCA review
b. Additional Progress Since 1999 Visit
V. Meeting the Criteria with Purpose: Addressing Criterions 1-5
with a focus on the Special Emphasis
a. Mission and Integrity
b. Preparing for the Future
c. Student Learning and Effective Teaching
d. Acquisition, Discovery, and Application of Knowledge
e. Engagement and Service
VI. Reaching for the Stars: Planning for Future Impact
a. Synergies across the Disciplines
VIII. Federal Compliance and Changes during the Accreditation CycleDraft Self-Study Outline
Minutes of major organizational committees activities.
Reports referenced in self-study
Policies and procedures related to curriculum adoption, review, and evaluation
Policies on interactions with other organizations
Policies on use of computer resources
Physical facilities maintenance and master plans
Budgets and expenditures for the organization as a whole and major units for the past five years
Catalogs, view books, and other promotional materials
Faculty, student, and staff handbooks
Bylaws of faculty and staff assemblies
Reports from other agencies or accrediting bodiesResource Room Materials
Policies for employment, supervision, and evaluation of full- and part-time faculty and teaching assistants
Governance documents: charters, by-laws, policies, membership, minutes, reports, etc.
Student service policies: residence, governance, health, financial aid, records, refunds, etc.
Agreements for consortia or contractual relationships
Complete roster of faculty members (full- and part-time) and their teaching assignments for the current term
Board rosters, charters, by-laws for separately incorporated entities: foundations, alumni associations, athletic corporations, etc.
Documents concerning Title III compliance and recertification
Third party comment noticesResource Room Materials continued . . .