200 likes | 328 Views
Continuous student assesment : implementation and results. P Truffert, D Lacroix, D Gosset M Lance, A Deroo, JC Alexandre. French medical studies. 6 years. DCEM4. DCEM4 ( ≈ 450 students). CSCTU faculty exam. ECN : national ranking exam About 8000 students in France.
E N D
Continuous student assesment : implementation and results P Truffert, D Lacroix, D Gosset M Lance, A Deroo, JC Alexandre
French medical studies • 6 years DCEM4 DCEM4 (≈ 450 students) CSCTU faculty exam ECN : national ranking exam About 8000 students in France
Lille II rank at ECN : disappointing results One of the national universities quality criteria
Csctu before 2011 • Written final exam • 4 medical cases scenarios to resolve • Problem solving, clinical reasoning, knowledge and therapeutic • 80% of the total exam score • Oral test • Bedside evaluation • Specific therapeutic oriented program
Csctu 2011 : continuous assesment • Same written/oral testing • No specific program • The hole ECN program is covered by assesment • 20 assesments, 2 case scenarios each
Csctu : continuous evaluation • The « fridays » Friday 1h30 evaluation Friday 1h30 evaluation Monday 2h 1 Corrected record csctu 2 cases « ecn type» Hématologia 2 cases « ecn » Psychiatry Course And correction Hématologia Monday 20 senior 1 spécialist
Monday Correction • Software • 20 senior residents • Sensibilisation • case elaboration • Case correction (which keywords, what relative importance) • Présence of 1 spécialist • Can modify some keywords (synonyms etc…) • Sees the principal difficulties encountered by the students • Can adapt the learning messages for next friday
- 7 22% 2% 47%
Continuous assesment • Weekly individualized results
Other learning facilities • Saturday morning seminars • In the two last months before ECN • 5 courses (3h) « best of » concerning themes chosen by the students • Evening conferences • 2 per week • 4 case scenarios and 3h correction
Analysis strategy • Individual student ranking variation 2009-2011 • Description by quartiles • Correlation between csctu ranking and ECN ranking 2011
Analysis strategy • ECN ranking estimation • linear Regression • Predicted values – Observed values • Under estimation : student winned + 1000 ranks at ECN • Over estimation : student lost -1000 ranks ECN • Correct estimation : difference < 1000 places
Results Q Q Q Q Ranking distribution by quartiles 2009-2011
Results Correlation r : 0.8 (p<10-4) Détermination r2 : 0.64 36% of the ECN was not explained by the csctu ranking Corrélation csctu ranking vs ECN
Results under Over • Predictive quality of the csctu ranking • 38% overestimated : falsy reassured ?
Back to the future… National ranking of Lille 2 : 2007-2011 Promotion effect? Waiting for 2012 confirmation… Understanding which learning and teaching issues are involved?