1 / 36

PEP Super-B High Power RF

PEP Super-B High Power RF. Peter McIntosh SLAC. Super-B Factory Workshop in Hawaii 20-22 April 2005 University of Hawaii. Outline. RF Requirements Cavity Limitations Voltage Power Klystrons 1.2 MW 2.4 MW Circulators HVPS System System Configurations Conclusions. RF Requirements.

dyani
Download Presentation

PEP Super-B High Power RF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PEP Super-B High Power RF Peter McIntosh SLAC Super-B Factory Workshop in Hawaii20-22 April 2005University of Hawaii

  2. Outline • RF Requirements • Cavity Limitations • Voltage • Power • Klystrons • 1.2 MW • 2.4 MW • Circulators • HVPS System • System Configurations • Conclusions

  3. RF Requirements • 3 cavity solutions being investigated: • R/Q = 5, 15 and 30 W (see S Novokhatski’s talk). • The RF power required for L = 7e35 and 1e36 varies as a function of cavity option as the R/Q impacts primarily the HOM losses: • As R/Q goes up  cavity HOM losses go up! • The R/Q also impacts the cryogenic losses which affect the Total AC power required: • As R/Q goes up  cavity cryogenic losses go down! • For the cavity options being investigated, the net difference in Total AC power is almost zero! • Assuming the cavity to be used lies somewhere between 5 – 30 W we can see that ……

  4. RF and AC Power (5W)

  5. Increased Reduced RF and AC Power (30W)

  6. RF and AC Power Summary • To define the number of cavities required, have assumed that 1 MW can be supplied to each RF cavity (see later). • For L = 7e35 using R/Q = 5 W cavity: • LER = 21.7 MW • HER = 16.2 MW • For L = 7e35 using R/Q = 30 W cavity: • LER = 22.1 MW • HER = 16.2 MW • For L = 1e36 using R/Q = 5 W cavity: • LER = 39.8 MW • HER = 24.9 MW • For L = 1e36 using R/Q = 30 W cavity: • LER = 42.0 MW • HER = 25.0 MW • Cavity HOM losses increase by 2.2 MW in the LER at 1e36. • Total AC cryogenic power however reduces considerably for the 30 W cavity by 50% for both luminosity options compared to the 5 W cavity. • Net AC power difference is comparable (to within 2%) for each cavity option at each luminosity.

  7. R/Q=15W Solution

  8. Cavity Limitations - Voltage • Practical achievable voltage/cell depends upon: • Cavity Qo • Niobium purity • Cryogenic operating temperature • Cryogenic load • For the R/Q = 5, 15 and 30  cavities: • Required voltage per cell Vc = 1.25 MV, requiring Qo = 3e9, 1e9 and 1e9 respectively. • For feedback stability R/Q = 5 W preferable  lowest detuning (seeD. Teytelman’s talk) • For cryogenic reasons R/Q = 30 W preferable (see later). • Number of cavities required is the same for each @ L =7e35. • At L = 1e36, the cavity HOM losses in the LER require more RF cavities (2) at R/Q = 30 W. • What cavity voltage can we expect to reach ….

  9. Voltage for R/Q = 5  Cavity

  10. Voltage for R/Q = 30  Cavity

  11. Voltage for R/Q = 15  Cavity

  12. Cavity Epk and Hpk Parameters S Novokhatski

  13. Voltage Overhead (for 30W) Theoretical Quench Limit for Nb (Hpk = 1700 Oe or 135.281 kA/m) Field Emission Onset (Epk > 10 MV/m)

  14. Voltage Overhead (for 5W) Theoretical Quench Limit for Nb (Hpk = 1700 Oe or 135.281 kA/m) Field Emission Onset (Epk > 10 MV/m)

  15. Voltage Overhead (for 15W) Theoretical Quench Limit for Nb (Hpk = 1700 Oe or 135.281 kA/m) Field Emission Onset (Epk > 10 MV/m)

  16. Cavity Limitations - Power • To minimize the number of RF cavities per ring: • Based on what has been achieved at ~ 500 MHz for both KEK-B and CESR: • 1 MW total RF input power per cavity has been chosen! • Cavity will employ dual RF feeds, each providing up to 500 kW. • RF breakdown investigations need to be performed to identify a system that can meet this power requirement at 952 MHz. • Coaxial coupler arrangement  more compact. • Is this power level realistically achievable?

  17. KEK-B (fRF = 508 MHz): Biased coaxial coupler Operate typically up to 350 kW For Super-KEKB hope to reach 500 kW Tested up to 800 kW (through) CESR (fRF = 500 MHz): Aperture waveguide coupled Operate typically up to 300 kW Operated up to 360 kW (through) Cavity Input Couplers

  18. Klystrons – 1.2 MW • SLAC already produces 1.2 MW tubes at 476 MHz for PEP-II. • Each powered by a 2.5 MVA DC HVPS. • Tube operates at 83 kV and 24 A with perveance of 1.004. • Maintaining these beam parameters for Super-B @ 952 MHz would enable the same HVPS system to be used. • Scale the cavity frequencies, drift tube spacing, gap lengths, drift pipe and beam radii. • Magnetic field increases by factor of 2  existing 476 MHz tube focus coil adequate.

  19. 1.2 MW Klystron – Small Signal

  20. 1.2 MW Klystron – Large Signal

  21. 1.2 MW Klystron Specification Gun Accelerating Cavities 140.0 RF Output (WR975) Collector (Full power)

  22. Klystrons – 2.4 MW • Doubling in RF power means that the existing 2.5 MVA HVPS can no longer be used  now need a 4 MVA HVPS. • Beam power characteristics increase up to 125 kV and 29.2 A with drop in perveance to 0.6607. • Higher beam voltage increases cavity spacing and gap lengths  accelerating section ~ 20% longer than the 1.2 MW tube. • Magnetic field comparable to that of the 1.2 MW tube. • Thermal loading of the output circuit requires more detailed investigation. • Suspect will most likely require a dual output to minimize thermal loading at the RF windows.

  23. 2.4 MW Klystron – Large Signal

  24. 2.4 MW Klystron Specification Gun Accelerating Cavities 160.0 RF Output (WR975) Collector (Full power) * Needs further optimization

  25. Klystron Option Footprints 1.2 MW @ 476 MHz 83 kV and 24 A Perveance = 1.004 210.07 1.2 MW @ 952 MHz 83 kV and 24 A Perveance = 1.004 140.0 2.4 MW @ 952 MHz 125 kV and 29.2 A Perveance = 0.6607 160.0

  26. 2.4 MW AFT Circulator Layout

  27. 1.7% 1 dry load, 1 water load Full Reflection! Klystron would see 2.4 kW in beam abort x 4 increase c.f. 1.2 MW 476 MHz unit Circulators Spec

  28. HVPS • Originally designed for a depressed collector klystron. • Existing 2.5 MVA HVPS has a primary SCR-controlled rectifier operating at the existing site-wide distribution voltage of 12.47kV: • control provides for fast voltage adjustment and fault protection. • Rectifier configuration prevents the dump of filter capacitor stored energy into the klystron in the event of a klystron arc. • 12.47kV enters the circuit breaker and manual load disconnect switch and provides a safety lock and tag disconnect for maintenance. • Remote turn-on and turn-off is by a full, fault-rated vacuum breaker used as a contactor. • A 12-pulse rectifier reduces power line harmonic distortion to industrial standards.

  29. PEP-II/SPEAR3 2.5 MVA HVPS

  30. Super-B HVPS Options • 1.2 MW Klystron: • Existing 2.5 MVA HVPS system compatible. • No development overhead. • 2.4 MW Klystron: • Same 2.5 MVA HVPS design, with larger transformers to reach 4 MVA: • Applicable transformers are commercially available. • Higher voltage required (125 kV): • Makes HV connections more difficult/expensive. • Anticipate a 20 – 30% size and cost increase over the existing 2.5 MVA unit.

  31. System Configuration 1 1.2 MW Klystron Single 952 MHz RF Cavity 1.2 MW Circulator WR975 Waveguide

  32. 2.4 MW Klystron Dual 952 MHz RF Cavities 2.4 MW Circulator WR975 Waveguide System Configuration 2

  33. 1.2 MW Circulator Dual 952 MHz RF Cavities 2.4 MW Klystron 1.2 MW Circulator System Configuration 3

  34. Conclusions • RF requirements for L=7e35 and L=1e36 identified  need up to 190 MW site AC power! • Low R/Q cavities needed for stability control. • Cavity voltage and RF power limits identified  how far can we push these?!? • High power klystrons (> 1 MW) at 952 MHz look to be achievable. • High power circulators appear to be available from industry. • HVPS systems for Super-PEPII klystrons are available now at 1.2 MW, but require development at 2.4 MW. Watch this space!

  35. Thank You

  36. RF Parameters Summary

More Related