1 / 6

CurCom Phase 2.3

The CurCom in Phase 2.3 proposes a robust affirmation of the Core/Foundation structure for the undergraduate curriculum. This framework includes essential sophomore year core courses such as CINE200, CINE202/04, and CINE211/212, alongside junior year foundation courses like GWAR and CINE340/41. The model addresses articulation issues for transfer students, ensuring seamless integration into the curriculum. This revision aims to optimize course volume, support student progression, and lower pressure on history courses, facilitating a smoother educational trajectory.

duncan
Download Presentation

CurCom Phase 2.3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CurComPhase 2.3

  2. Phase 2.3 • Objective: • Vote to affirm the Core/Foundation structure

  3. Phase 2.3 • Core/Foundation (21 units – including the possible one unit course) • Sophomore Year Core Courses: • CINE200 (3 units) • CINE202/04 (4 units) • INTRODUCTION TO PRODUCTION W/ HANDS ON COMPONENT • CINE211 History I (3 units) • CINE212 History II (3 units) • Articulation issues: • Solves the problem of transfer students paying twice • TMC/SB1440 • CINE3XX – One Unit Advising Module (?) • Junior Year Foundation Courses: • GWAR (3 units) • CINE340/41 – (4 units)

  4. Phase 2.3 Core/Foundation Model based on a standard student’s trajectory

  5. Phase 2.3 • Core/Foundation • Anticipated issues • Volume of courses • Critical to the beginning, intermediate, advanced progression • These are not separate from the individual Emphases (whether we have them or not) • Pushed back to the Sophomore level • i.e., most of the Junior/Senior level is dedicated to more specialized work in Emphases • “Articulate-able” • Transfer students can hit the ground running • Reduces pressure on the history courses

  6. Phase 2.3 • Core/Foundation • Discussion • Motion: • The CurCom recommends that the faculty affirm the revisions to the Core/Foundation of the Undergraduate curriculum. • Vote • Affirming the Core/Foundation structure • Yes or no

More Related