Download Presentation
Judgment and Decision Making

Loading in 2 Seconds...

1 / 14

# Judgment and Decision Making - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Judgment and Decision Making. How Rational Are We?. Normative Models. “Rational” = selecting optimally What gets optimized? 2 normative models: Expected Value : Highest monetary value Expected Utility : Highest psychological value

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Judgment and Decision Making' - duer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Judgment and Decision Making

How Rational Are We?

Normative Models
• “Rational” = selecting optimally
• What gets optimized? 2 normative models:
• Expected Value: Highest monetary value
• Expected Utility: Highest psychological value
• Expected value vs. expected utility: Survey Results (in class)
• Expected Value = objective value * probability
• Expected Utility = subjective utility * probability
Violations of Expected Utility Theory
• Certainty Effects
• Allais Paradox
• Certainty of Negative Outcomes
• Preference Reversals
• Context Effects
• Framing Effects
• Sunk Costs

(each discussed in subsequent slides)

Certainty Effects
• Which would you prefer?
• A) 40% chance at \$40
• B) 50% chance at \$30
• Which would you prefer?
• A) 80% chance at \$40
• B) 100% chance at \$30
• The “subjective utility” of the \$30 changes from option 1 to option 2. Irrational.
Allais Paradox

Which of each pair do you prefer?

(Allais, 1953).

Certainty of Negative Outcomes

Which of the two choices for treating an epidemic would you choose? (Tversky & Kahneman, 1981)

Class A

Moderately interesting

Moderately difficult

Prof is so-so

10 am

Class B

Very interesting

Very difficult

Prof is very good

8 am

Preference Reversals

Choice 1: You must choose one to sign up for.

Choice 2: You are enrolled in both, but must drop one.

Context Effects
• Choosing between A and B should not be affected by what other alternatives are present (but it is)
• Example: Attraction Effect
• Having a third choice that is “dominated by” one of the two choices makes that one more attractive.
Car A

Reliabiliy: 8

Cost: \$24,000

Car B

Reliabiliy: 5

Cost: \$20,000

Car A

Reliabiliy: 8

Cost: \$24,000

Car B

Reliabiliy: 5

Cost: \$20,000

Car C

Reliabiliy: 6

Cost: \$25,000

Attraction Effect
Frame A:

Without the new treatment, 700 soldiers will die

With the new treatment, there is a 70% chance that all of them will die, and a 30% chance that none will die.

Frame B:

Without the new treatment, 300 will be saved.

With the new treatment, there is a 70% chance that none of them will be saved, and a 30% chance that all of them will be saved.

Framing Effects
Sunk Costs
• Rationally, we should not consider sunk (unrecoverable) costs when deciding what to do next. But we do.
• Would you walk out of a boring movie?
• What if admission had been free?
• What if you had paid \$50 to see it?
• Should you sell your stocks if you think they will go down in price? What if you paid twice the current price when you bought it?
Summary thus far
• Are we rational in our decision making?
• We do not follow Expected Value
• We do not even follow Expected Utility
• If we do not make decisions the way these prescriptive theories say we should, can we describe how we actually do make decisions?
Descriptive Theories of Decision Making
• Prospect Theory
• Evaluation is relative to a Reference Point rather than being absolute (accounts for framing effects)
• Psychological Probabilities (pi) are used rather than objective probabilities.
• Regret Theory
• We try to minimize the anticipated feelings of regret for our decisions.
Shortcuts and Strategiesin Decision Making
• “Satisficing” – Herb Simon
• Searching for an acceptable answer, rather than for an optimal one.
• Specific Heuristics:
• Elimination by aspects
• Availability Heuristic
• Representativeness Heuristic
• Anchoring