slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004

Loading in 2 Seconds...

  share
play fullscreen
1 / 11
Download Presentation

Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

duena
145 Views
Download Presentation

Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. NAVY-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL DIALOG V-22 International Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004

  2. The V-22and theWar onTerrorism

  3. MC-130H (3) OPSEC considerations: = moderate profile = high profile Physical security risk: = low = moderate = high Forces - Afghanistan [Prevent](without V-22) KC-135 KC-135 3 C-5s, helicopter teardown at Taegu 19 aircraft through Kadena KC-135 KC-135 2/75thRangers(100) MH-47E (4) C-5 (3) 5th SFG(12) DOE Tech(10) KC-135 C-17 (2) MH-53M (4) B-1 (3) KC-135 C-5 (3) KC-135 KC-135 KC-135 AC-130 (3) MC-130E (5) Complex; Multiple Failure Nodes

  4. MC-130H (3) OPSEC considerations: = moderate profile = high profile Physical security risk: = low = moderate = high Forces - Afghanistan [Prevent](with V-22) KC-135 KC-135 2/75th Rangers (100) CV-22 (7) 5th SFG(12) DOETech (10) KC-135 C-17 (2) B-1 (3) KC-135 KC-135 AC-130 (3) Simpler and More Likely to Succeed

  5. Scenario Prevent 1 Support Costs Afghanistan $1,852,165 $ 3,083,412 + + = $388,035 $2,307,342 $388,035 $610,801 $9,017,951 = + $2,171,621 $6,846,330 $337,935 $566,131 (Not actual number of tankers) (Not actual number of tankers) $13,167,494 $2,800,901 Total Air Costs

  6. V-22 Multi-Mission Applications for the UKFinal ReportSeptember, 1999

  7. Tilt-rotor Characteristics RequiredAdditional Missions The basic V-22 airframe, with the appropriate mission kits or system modifications, is suitable for all of the eight additional missions which were examined, but not modelled.

  8. Multi Mission Capability • In Flight Refueling (tanker) • At 600 nm radius, give away 2,500 lbs • At 200 nm radius, give away 16,500 lbs • COD/VOD/VERTREP • 24 personnel • 15,000 lbs cargo • 20,000 lbs internal • Special Operations • Single aircraft ops • Choice of USMC and SOCOM • ASW • Large area search • Small area localization • Airborne mine countermeasures • AEW • Search and Rescue • Peacetime and combat • 805 nm range (MV/HV mission) • Command & Control • NATO Reaction Force

  9. Public Web Site: http://pma275.navair.navy.mil

  10. Take-Away • Breaking the paradigm “It’s not a typical Helicopter, it’s a Tiltrotor” • Flight characteristics better than a conventional Helo • Significant increase in response time, survivability & maintainability • Unit cost slightly higher than conventional Helo but yields returns in capabilities + support footprint + manpower = lower operational cost • Reduce Type Model Series and gain • Multi-mission platform optimizes V-22 saving over life cycle • Mission support structure optimized (manpower, facilities & other platforms) • Interoperability with NATO and coalition partners • Cooperative development program opportunities • Support structure commonality