1 / 21

Study of Foregrounds and Limitations to EoR Detection

Study of Foregrounds and Limitations to EoR Detection. Nithyanandan Thyagarajan N. Udaya Shankar Ravi Subrahmanyan (Raman Research Institute). Outline. Estimates of uncertainties in EoR power spectrum Classical Radio Source Confusion

dtyler
Download Presentation

Study of Foregrounds and Limitations to EoR Detection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Study of Foregrounds and Limitations to EoR Detection Nithyanandan Thyagarajan N. Udaya Shankar Ravi Subrahmanyan (Raman Research Institute)

  2. Outline • Estimates of uncertainties in EoR power spectrum • Classical Radio Source Confusion • Sidelobesdue to Frequency dependent beams (mode-mixing) • Thermal Noise • Understanding effects of array configuration on EoR sensitivity • Understanding effects of bandwidth • Conclusions

  3. Framework of our Study • Radio Source Distribution • 128-tile MWA Layout • Relations Hopkins et al. (2003)

  4. Classical Source Confusion • Solid Angles in (l,m) domain

  5. Classical Confusion in k-space • Consider zenith pixel • Smooth variation along frequency of residuals • Delta function at k|| = 0 • Array configuration determines variation along • Lies outside of EoR window • Bandpass spillover into EoR window k

  6. Response in u-v Annulus • Consider as point source of strength σC • Uniform response across all baselines • Integrate coherently over bandwidth

  7. Sidelobe Confusion • Classical confusion is the source of sidelobes • Weighted by primary beam • Sidelobe confusion at zenith comparable when Brms=Nbeams-1/2 • Sidelobes have frequency structure (results in mode-mixing)

  8. Modeled Primary Beam

  9. Mode-mixing Principle Bowman et al. (2009) ηcont = umax l / f Vedantham et al. (2011) Transverse structure of contamination translates to a line-of-sight structure due to mode-mixing l-f invariance

  10. PSF Decomposition • Fourier Basis Coordinates (u,v) are linear & independent • Net PSF conveniently decomposed into component PSF sensitive to specific k

  11. Sidelobe Confusion in k-space k|| m v IFT k l u FT

  12. Sidelobe Confusion response in u-v annulus • Baselines inside independent cells add coherently • Incoherent across independent cells • Integrate coherently over bandwidth

  13. Sidelobe Confusion in k-space Horizon (l2+m2=1) First null of Primary Beam Edge Brightening

  14. Thermal Noise • Vrms(u,v,f)= 2kBTsys/Ae (Δfτ)1/2 • Snapshot mode: 8 sec integration time • Thermal noise uniform along k|| (No convolution) • Distribution along determined by Baseline distribution k

  15. Properties of Thermal Noise • Incoherent integration along bandwidth • Incoherent across baselines Morales (2005)

  16. Thermal Noise in k-space

  17. Combined Uncertainty • Add in quadrature • Thermal noise dominates in snapshot mode

  18. Modeled EoR Power Spectrum • P(k) from Lidz et al.(2008) for z=7.32, ionization fraction=0.54 • Peculiar Velocity corrections applied

  19. Measured EoR Power Spectrum • Pass through bandpass • Observed through array configuration

  20. Summary of Uncertainties and EoR Power Spectrum

  21. Conclusions • Radio source statistics and 128T MWA layout • Comprehensive estimate in k-space of • Sidelobe confusion due to mode-mixing • Classical Source Confusion • Thermal Noise • Array configuration has different effects on each • Thermal Noise overwhelms in snapshot modeand requires longer integration times (~ few hours) • In thermal noise limited regime, lower effective bandwidth degrades sensitivity

More Related