1 / 32

The Affordable Care Act and possible alternatives

The Affordable Care Act and possible alternatives. the Affordable Care Act. The basics. Requires U.S. citizens and legal residents to have qualifying health coverage Tax penalty for those who do not Exemptions for financial hardship, religious objections, and other objections

dthurston
Download Presentation

The Affordable Care Act and possible alternatives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Affordable Care Act and possible alternatives

  2. the Affordable Care Act

  3. The basics • Requires U.S. citizens and legal residents to have qualifying health coverage • Tax penalty for those who do not • Exemptions for financial hardship, religious objections, and other objections • Provides premium tax credits to eligible individuals with incomes between 100% and 400% of FPL to purchase coverage on the Marketplace • Provides cost-sharing reductions to eligible individuals with household income between 100% and 250% of FLP that enroll in Silver plans on the Marketplace

  4. The basics • Prohibits lifetime and annual dollar limits • Prohibits pre-existing condition exclusions • Provides dependent coverage for children up to age 26 • Limits annual cost sharing for individuals and families • $7,150  individual for 2017 • $14,300  family for 2017 • Requires medical loss ratio (“MLR”) standards for individual, small group and large group plans • 80%  individual and small group • 85%  large group

  5. The basics • Requires all individual and small group ACA-compliant plans to cover the 10 essential health benefit categories

  6. The basics • Requires all individual and small group ACA-compliant plans to cover preventive services as required by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) at zero cost-sharing even if the policyholder has not met his deductible

  7. Types of Plans Available • Metal Levels • ACA-compliant plans available on and off the Marketplace are categorized into metal levels • Metal levels are based on how the costs of health care will be divided and paid for by the consumer and the insurance company • Metal levels are not based on the types of benefits provided under the plan • The metal levels are Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum

  8. Types of Plans Available Bronze Plans Silver Plans Moderate premium Moderate deductible Eligible for cost-sharing reductions Insurance pays approximately 70% Consumer pays approximately 30% • Low premium • High deductible • Not eligible for cost-sharing reductions • Insurance pays approximately 60% • Consumer pays approximately 40%

  9. Types of Plans Available Gold Plans Platinum Plans High premiums Low deductible Not eligible for cost-sharing reductions Insurance pays approximately 90% Consumer pays approximately 10% • Moderately high premium • Moderately low deductible • Not eligible for cost-sharing reductions • Insurance pays approximately 80% • Consumer pays approximately 20%

  10. Status • The ACA is still the law of the land • Recent sub-regulatory guidance has modified some of the requirements of the ACA

  11. Market Stabilization Rule

  12. The basics • The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Market Stabilization final rule was issued by the Department of Health and Human Services on April 18, 2017 • This sub-regulatory guidance modifies the interpretation of certain provisions of the ACA

  13. The Basics • Shortens the open enrollment period from November 1, 2017 to December 15, 2017 • Requires pre-enrollment verification for 100% of all new consumers applying for a special enrollment period • Allows insurance companies to require individuals to pay back past due premiums before they can enroll into a plan with the same insurance company for the following year • Allows flexibility in certain plans’ actuarial value

  14. Status • This rule was effective beginning June 19, 2017

  15. the American health care act

  16. The basics • The American Health Care Act (“AHCA”) is a repeal and replacement legislation that was introduced in the House of Representatives (“House”) on March 20, 2017 • Additional amendments were made to the original bill • The Palmer – Schweikert Amendment established the Federal Invisible Risk Sharing Program • The MacArthur Amendment established state waivers for the age ratio, essential health benefits package, and underwriting

  17. The basics

  18. Status • The House voted on the AHCA on May 4, 2017 • It passed with a final vote was 217 – 213

  19. The better care reconciliation act

  20. The Basics • The Better Care Reconciliation Act (“BCRA”) is a repeal and replacement amendment to the AHCA that was introduced in the Senate on June 22, 2017 • An additional amendment permitted insurance companies to not comply with the essential health benefits or community rating requirements of the ACA

  21. The basics

  22. Status • The Senate voted on the BCRA on July 25, 2017 • It failed with a final vote of 51 – 50

  23. The Graham-Cassidy-Heller Amendment

  24. The basics

  25. Status • This is still active legislation • There has been no action on it to date

  26. Current issue regarding Cost-sharing reductions

  27. Cost-sharing reductions • Cost Sharing Reduction (“CSR”): a discount that lowers the amount that a consumer has to pay for deductibles, copayments and coinsurance. • Insurance companies take on additional costs by providing CSRs to eligible consumers • The Department of Treasury reimburses the insurance companies • This is a separate subsidy from premium tax credit • Eligibility is determined by the federal government • 100% and 250% of the federal poverty level • Only available on Marketplace Silver plans

  28. Cost-sharing Reductions

  29. United States House of representatives v. price, et al. • Initially United States House of Representatives v. Burwell, et al. • In 2014, the House filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration • The federal government reimbursed insurance companies who provided CSRs to Marketplace enrollees that enroll in a Silver plan and have incomes between 100% and 250% of the Federal Poverty Line • The House claimed that Congress had never appropriated the funds to reimburse such insurance companies and such reimbursements were a violation of the Appropriations Clause under the Constitution • In September 2015, the District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the House did have standing • Violation of Constitutional rights • Justiciability because the injury was concreate, particular, and redressable

  30. United States House of representatives v. price, et al. • In May 2016, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer ruled in favor of the House • Granted the House’s Motion for Summary Judgement • Enjoined further reimbursements until a valid appropriation was in place but stayed the injunction pending any appeal by either party • The Obama administration filed an appeal • In December 2016, the case was delayed until after President Trump took office • Likely to change the ACA • Further action required in February 2017

  31. United States House of representatives v. price, et al. • In March 2017, the District Court granted a joint status report motion submitted by the House and Department of Justice to submit a status report every three months beginning May 2017 • Multiple continuances have been filed since this motion was granted • The next status report is due on October 30, 2017 • In May 2017, New York and California filed a Motion to Intervene and Motion to Lift Abeyance to Consider States’ Motion to Intervene to protect the interests of its states and residents • This was granted in September 2017 • The case is still being held in abeyance

  32. Questions?

More Related