1 / 10

Dan Greenberg, Ph.D. 1,2

ISPOR Eastern and Central European Forum Dublin, October 23, 2007. The Use of Pharmacoeconomics in the Process of Updating the National List of Health Services in Israel. Dan Greenberg, Ph.D. 1,2 Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

dotty
Download Presentation

Dan Greenberg, Ph.D. 1,2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ISPOR Eastern and Central European Forum Dublin, October 23, 2007 The Use of Pharmacoeconomics in the Process of Updating the National List of Health Services in Israel Dan Greenberg, Ph.D.1,2 Department of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel ISPOR-Israel

  2. The Israeli Healthcare System • A semi-public system, dominated by the Ministry of Health (and the Ministry of Finance) and the country’s four health plans (HMOs) • The National Health Insurance Law (NHIL) enacted in 1995 has made health insurance both compulsory and universal • The NHIL stipulates a National List of Health Services (NLHS) which all residents are entitled from their health plans

  3. The Process of Updating the NLHS • Call for proposals for new technologies to be included in the NLHS • Submission of dossiers according to guidelines published by the Ministry of Health • Rapid screening and assessment of proposed technologies

  4. The Process of Updating the NLHS • Comprehensive evaluation and ranking of technologies • Discussions and recommendations made by the Public National Advisory Committee • Government approval, legislation and allocation of funds to health plans

  5. The Process of Updating the NLHS

  6. The Process of Updating the NLHS • The ultimate objective of the committee (process) is to inform decision-makers on new technologies which will both maximize health outcomes and provide “good value for money” under a pre-specified budget constraint

  7. The Process of Updating the NLHS • Absolute priority is given to "life saving" technologies with total disregard of preventive services • The use of pharmacoeconomics (cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses) is essential

  8. The Use of Pharmacoeconomics • Timing of adoption: Israel is an early adopter of “life-saving” technologies. Adoption decisions are made prior the availability of economic data • The large number of technologies considered does not allow a comprehensive health technology assessment • Transferability of cost-effectiveness models cannot be easily adapted to the Israeli healthcare setting

  9. The Use of Pharmacoeconomics • Lack of good local data: epidemiological and economic data are not always available • The Ministry of Health has insufficient personnel to conduct economic evaluations • Only budget impact analyses are used to guide coverage decisions

  10. What can be done? • Encourage collaborations between HMOs, Ministry of Health and Pharmaceutical companies • Consider Rapid technology assessments to guide decisions • Collaboration with agencies in other countries

More Related