1 / 19

The Environmental Union?

The Environmental Union?. Iain Murray Senior Fellow, CEI The Bruges Group Conference November 22, 2008. The Foreign Secretary Speaks!.

dorothyfrodriguez
Download Presentation

The Environmental Union?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Environmental Union? Iain Murray Senior Fellow, CEI The Bruges Group Conference November 22, 2008

  2. The Foreign Secretary Speaks! “An environmental contract has to stretch beyond each nation – we have to embed a shared willingness to tackle climate change across Europe and beyond. This is a challenge that the European Union was designed for: addressing global problems that require cooperation across borders. Europe has a strong environmental record on which to build. From air pollution and water quality to recycling. But in future, we should go further. It’s raison d’etre in the 21st century must be to prevent the exploitation of the planet. The European Union must become the Environmental Union. “ --David Miliband MP, October 19, 2006

  3. The Environmental Union? • EU has failed in all its supposed environmental ambitions • It has imposed costs upon the world • It has created subprime jobs • It has restricted real environmental improvement

  4. How has Kyoto Done?

  5. Is Emissions Reduction Easy?

  6. The Real Cost of Global Warming

  7. Another Example: REACH • Most expansive extension of chemical regulation ever • Global enforcement of precautionary principle • Protectionist – reduces US access to EU markets • Feeder for UN Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management • US States eg New Jersey trying to implement

  8. Green Subsidies? Spanish Example(Hat-tip: Gabriel Calzada) • TheEU wants 12% renewable energy in 2010 and 20% in 2010 • Spain has been a leader in promoting “renewable energy” • Wind subsidies: 90% over market price for 15 years then 80% over (This has varied from 136 to 209% since 2007) • Solar subsidies: 575% over market for 25 years then 460% • 12 to 20% return on investment

  9. Spanish Renewables Bubble • Spanish companies become world leaders • 25,965 MW installed in “special regime” • Wind energy has largest share: 14,577 MW (10.2%) • Solar energy has 1000 MW (0.7%). The 2010 target was 371 MW

  10. Spanish Renewables Bubble • Bigproduction means jobs: 27,000 in the solar sector alone since 2004 • In 2007 alone the renewable subsidies account for 2.6 billion Euros

  11. Spanish Bubble Unsustainable • Miguel Sebastian declared renewable energies are “green and clean but very costly” .“Last year the premiums paid sum up 2000 millions while this year will be 3000”. • The government had to reduce by 30% the subsidy to solar energy and placed a cap of 300 new solar MW (1/2 of what has been installed from January till May 2008) • Now the Spanish green industry is falling down and going abroad to find more generous governments willing to give away taxpayers´ money

  12. Green Job…Losses • The softening of the renewable support in 2007 brought about 10,000 job losses • This year’s softening threatens to result in 40,000 new green unemployees

  13. Subprime Jobs!!! • The sector companies calculated they will have to fire over 40% of the workers • The sector generates almost no stable jobs (installation and construction) • The only way to generate jobs in this field is by creating artificially produced expectations

  14. EU Promises on Climate • “Will reduce warming”? NO! • “Will reduce CO2 emissions”? NO! • “Will be done at low cost”? NO! • “Will create jobs”? NO!

  15. Is There An Alternative? • Yes, but it involves the free market • Will be of benefit to the economy whatever happens • Will reduce bureaucracy • Will help the developing world • …therefore no chance of ever being adopted by the EU!

  16. Focused Adaptation • Main risks of global warming: hunger, disease, sea level rise, water stress, biodiversity • Halting global warming is an expensive way of tackling these problems • Goklany (2008): halting global warming reduce hunger, disease and sea level rise by 4-10 percent by 2085, but increase water stress and biodiversity problems at a cost of much more than $165 billion annually for many years • Focused adaptation could reduce each of these problems by 50-75% by 2015 at a cost of less than $34 billion annually, and also provide benefits in terms of child mortality, literacy etc.

  17. Resiliency • Wealthier societies manage disasters better • 1955: Hurricane Janet, category 5, hits Mexico – 600 people killed • 2007: Hurricane Dean, category 5, hits Mexico in exact same place – no-one killed • 2005: Hurricane Katrina, category 5, hits most vulnerable place in America and kills 1,836 • 2008: Cyclone Nargis, category 4, hits Burma and kills at least 84,500

  18. The EU Climate Policy in a Nutshell “In short, if we can rise to the challenge, the permanent abolition of the wheel would have the marvelously synergistic effect of creating thousands of new jobs - as blacksmiths, farriers, grooms and so on - at the same time as it conserved energy and saved the planet from otherwise inevitable devastation.” -- Catherine Bennett, The Guardian, 2004

  19. For more information The Really Inconvenient Truths on Amazon The PIG to Global Warming on Amazon http://www.globalwarming.org http://cei.org http://planetgore.nationalreview.com

More Related