1 / 14

1987 - 2008

21. 1987 - 2008. Public Relations Research Priorities International Delphi study by email Dr Tom Watson, Bournemouth University, UK. Objectives. New benchmarks on PR research priorities – 10 years since last study Common agenda brings academics and practitioners closer together

dmadison
Download Presentation

1987 - 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 21 1987 - 2008 Public Relations Research Priorities International Delphi study by email Dr Tom Watson, Bournemouth University, UK

  2. Objectives • New benchmarks on PR research priorities – 10 years since last study • Common agenda brings academics and practitioners closer together • Gives researched basis to bids for funding

  3. Delphi study • Survey method that uses “experts” • Expert = oracle = Delphi • Developed in 1950s by RAND Corporation in US • Seeks consensus for a range of ideas • Used in PR academic research since late 1970s – McElreath (1980, 1989, 1994), White & Blamphin (1994), Synnott & McKie (1997)

  4. Why a Delphi study? • Comparability and consistency • “Group communication process designed to obtain a consensus of opinion from a group of experts” (Hung, Altschuld & Lee 2008, p.191). • Purpose of a Delphi study is “not to discover all the answers, but to start a discussion on where a field is now and where it should be going” (Wakefield in Moss & Verčič, 2000, p.195) • Appropriate to widely dispersed group of experts (Wakefield 2000)

  5. Method • Piloted topics on blog, DummySpit • Blog open to anyone • Topics chosen • 26 PR research topics emailed to experts in six continents • Similar numbers of academics, practitioners and professional bodies • Invited to participate • Almost equal gender balance

  6. Process • Blog pilot refined topics; added two extra • Three rounds of discussion followed, each aimed at ranking topics; identifying RQs • High level of participation • 44 invited; 31 accepted (70.45%) • R1: 87.1% of acceptances • R2: 77.4% • R3: 51.6%

  7. Priorities – Top 5 1 Public relations’ role in contributing to strategic decision-making, strategy development and efficient operation of organisations 2 The value that public relations creates for organisations through building social capital and managing key relationships 3 The measurement and evaluation of public relations both offline and online 4 Public relations as a fundamental management function 5 Professional skills in public relations; analysis of the industry’s need for education

  8. Priorities 6-10 6 Research into standards of performance among PR professionals; the licensing of practitioners 7 Management of corporate reputation; measurement of reputation 8 Ethics in public relations 9 Integration of public relations with other communication functions; the scope of public relations practice; discipline boundaries 10 Management of relationships

  9. Priorities 11-14 11 Understanding of public relations 12 The impact of technology on public relations practice and theory 13 The role of PR in community/social responsibility programmes 14 International issues in public relations; intercultural public relations

  10. Comments • Differences between blog and expert responses to PR research topics • Impact of technology #1 on blog but #12 on Delphi study • Integration of PR #3 on blog but #9 on study • Evaluation, however, #2 on blog and #3 in study • Blogger interest dropped quickly – instant gratification?

  11. Changes from earlier studies: IN • Only ‘management of relationships’ is wholly new • ‘Measurement and evaluation of public relations’ is highly ranked by all three at first, first and third • ‘Impact of technology on public relations practice and theory’ is much lower now than a decade ago • Other topics in the Top Ten from all three studies are • ‘professional skills in public relations; analysis of the industry’s need for education’, • ‘research into standards of performance among PR professionals’ • ‘integration of public relations with other communication functions’; • ‘international issues in public relations; intercultural public relations’ is at a similar lowly ranking to 1994 in the UK, although it was higher in Synnott and McKie (1997)’s international study

  12. White and Blamphin (1994): Definition of public relations Strategic planning of public relations Image of public relations Impact of media content Gender issues in public relations practice Feature of the market for public relations practice Synnott and McKie 1997 The development of models for PR research and techniques such as news content analysis, consumer trend forecasting, issues monitoring and tracking techniques, benchmarking, continuous monitoring, frame analysis, public decision-making models, etc Changes from previous studies – OUT

  13. Priority for evaluation • Notable that measurement and evaluation, sometimes expressed as ‘proof’ or ‘value’, appears in several highly ranked topics, as well as the dedicated topic, ‘the measurement and evaluation of public relations both offline and online’

  14. Later … • Published results on blog – Second highest viewing; Series had 1500 hits • More study needed on use of blogs and wikis as research tools • Primarily a developed world view – replicate for Africa?

More Related