1 / 13

Workshop B: Quality Vs Quantity ways to promote quality students mobility

Workshop B: Quality Vs Quantity ways to promote quality students mobility. Nikos Liolios Department of European Educational Programmes. Main topics of focus. Quality assurance issues Selection criteria and evaluation procedures Monitoring academic performance

dkoffler
Download Presentation

Workshop B: Quality Vs Quantity ways to promote quality students mobility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop B: Quality Vs Quantity ways to promote quality students mobility Nikos Liolios Department of European Educational Programmes

  2. Main topics of focus • Quality assurance issues • Selection criteria and evaluation procedures • Monitoring academic performance • Assessment of previous mobilities’ quality

  3. Main goals of this workshop • To highlight the pros and the cons of the Erasmus+ mobility • To present AUTH’s best practices and exchange experiences • To review attitudes towards critical issues of the Erasmus+ mobilities • To suggest ‘solutions’ to difficulties

  4. Mobility phases and quality assurance

  5. University-wide point system • Eligibility thresholds • 50% of the number of ECTS credits up to the current semester (undergraduate students) • Minimum knowledge of main language of instruction • 5 weighted indicators • Development of an online platform

  6. University-wide point system • Indicator D1: Language of instruction

  7. University-wide point system • Indicator D2: Academic performance (average grade) (1.5 weight) • Indicator D3: ECTS Ratio (ratio of ECTS credits number awarded to the applicant to number of ECTS credits that the applicant should have been awarded upon successful completion of all components) (1.25 weight)

  8. University-wide point system • Indicator D4: Year of Study (1.0 weight) • Indicator D5: Motivation of the applicant (0.5 weight)

  9. University-wide point system Online platform

  10. Monitoring of academic performance • Define successful academic performance • Exams • Threshold regarding awarded ECTS credits • Central management of changes to Learning Agreement

  11. Follow-up procedure • Financial penalty for those not compliant with quality standards • Detailed record of academic performance and recognition • Statistical data of academic performance per School/Faculty for assessment purposes

  12. Thank you for your attention!!! Nikos Liolios Department of European Educational Programmes

More Related