1 / 19

Simmons/NCTAF; March 27, 2007 Designing Comprehensive Induction:

Simmons/NCTAF; March 27, 2007 Designing Comprehensive Induction: Subject-Specific, US and International Examples Edward (Ted) Britton, WestEd; Lynn Paine, MSU. Opener: tales of inspiring induction…. Basis of our information

dkathryn
Download Presentation

Simmons/NCTAF; March 27, 2007 Designing Comprehensive Induction:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Simmons/NCTAF; March 27, 2007 Designing Comprehensive Induction: Subject-Specific, US and International Examples Edward (Ted) Britton, WestEd; Lynn Paine, MSU

  2. Opener: tales of inspiring induction…..

  3. Basis of our information Three studies of induction programs for beginning mathematics and science teachers 1999-2009 1. International case studies 2. Case studies of U.S. programs 3. More study of beginning teachers’ needs in same/additional U.S. programs

  4. Data in U.S. studies: • 8 induction programs across 2 U.S. studies • following 5-10 mathematics and science novices, per program • 3-4 observations/interviews of each novice over 2 years • interviews with mentors, program leaders, activity providers • observations of program activities

  5. Session Overview Part 1: What is “comprehensive” induction? Part 2: What are “subject-specific needs” of beginning secondary teachers? Part 3: How can programs design for subject-specific needs?

  6. What are features of “comprehensive” induction programs? (participant discussion)

  7. Limited vs. ComprehensiveTeacher Induction

  8. Limited vs. ComprehensiveTeacher Induction

  9. Part II What are “subject-specific” needs of beginning secondary teachers? (Participant discussion)

  10. Part II What are “subject-specific” needs of beginning secondary teachers? (Participant discussion)

  11. Four types of subject-specific“needs” • content • curricular • 3. pedagogical content • 4. practical

  12. Subject-specific needs -- content knowledge: • college math versus school math • workplace math versus school math • connecting to real world, students’ lives

  13. Subject-specific needs -- curricular knowledge: • selecting/placing/pacing math topics • relationships between testing and curriculum • connections to other math courses, and courses in other subjects

  14. Subject-specific needs -- pedagogical knowledge: • multiple ways of representing content • constructing content-and-student appropriate tasks • understanding specific content within the disciplinary and curricular contexts • identifying student prior knowledge • understanding student errors and addressing student misconceptions • assessing student understanding

  15. Subject-specific needs -- practical knowledge: • acquiring classroom math resources • using math supplies, equipment • using community math resources

  16. Ways that programs address subject-specific needs Prior caveats: subject-explicit versus subject embedded programs; subject-specific versus general, not dichotomy

  17. Ways that programs address subject-specific needs Subject-matched mentors Issues: How much of a match? Dealing with general needs. Staffing a match e-mentoring

  18. Other Program Elements 1. ‘General’ courses taught in math context 2. Mini- math courses 3. Math curriculum focus 4. National community of math teachers 5. Summer school as a beginning teacher lab 6. Professional mathematics conferences

More Related