mima marine dept of malaysia world maritime day luncheon l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
MIMA / Marine Dept of Malaysia World Maritime Day Luncheon PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
MIMA / Marine Dept of Malaysia World Maritime Day Luncheon

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 46

MIMA / Marine Dept of Malaysia World Maritime Day Luncheon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

MIMA / Marine Dept of Malaysia World Maritime Day Luncheon. ” International Shipping – Carrier of World Trade” By John C. Fawcett-Ellis General Counsel & Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Kuala Lumpur, 24 September 2005. 90% of the world’s trade is move by ship

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'MIMA / Marine Dept of Malaysia World Maritime Day Luncheon' - dionysus

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
mima marine dept of malaysia world maritime day luncheon

MIMA / Marine Dept of Malaysia World Maritime Day Luncheon

”International Shipping – Carrier of World Trade”


John C. Fawcett-Ellis

General Counsel & Regional Manager Asia-Pacific

Kuala Lumpur, 24 September 2005

90% of the world’s trade is move by ship
  • 50,000 merchant ships trading internationally
  • Some 1,000,000 crew
  • World fleet registered with some 150 different flag states
  • Total freight some USD 380 billion (5% of total world trade)

INTERTANKO’s vision for the tanker industry:

“ A responsible, sustainable and respected industry able to influence its own destiny.”



  • World Oil Consumption 3.6 billion ts
  • Transported by sea 2.2 billion ts
  • 60% transported by sea.

Tanker incidents: 1978-03


Source: LMIS, Informa, press, INTERTANKO


Development of tanker oil spills

Source: ITOPF. Number of spills above 700 tonnes.


Accidental oil pollution from tankers and tanker trade

m ts spilt

1000 bn tm

Source: ITOPF, Fearnleys



  • Maintaining Supremacy of IMO & International Maritime Law
  • Common Structural Rules & Goal Based Standards
  • Criminalisation of Seafarers
  • Challenges to Industry Governance Structures
  • Other:
  • People issues Piracy
  • Ship Recycling Environmental Challenges
  • Competition Rules Security
  • Oil Pollution Liability (& Compensation)

Maintaining Supremacy of IMO & International Maritime Law

Against the challenges of Local and Regional Legislation

increasing politicization of regulation
Increasing politicization of regulation


  • Phase out of single hull tankers
  • West European Particularly Sensitive Sea Area
  • Moves to open up CLC/Fund Convention and link with substandard shipping
  • Penal sanctions adopted by EU, criminalising accidental pollution


  • Coastal state interests versus flag states, and reduced influence of maritime constituency
  • Power of EU Commission
the european institutions the power plays


(The executive)




(Direct election)


(Member States)

how it was examples of positive regulatory developments the imo spirit
HOW IT WAS: Examples of positive regulatory developments (the “IMO spirit”)
  • ISM Code and STCW (training)
  • post ‘Estonia’ passenger ferry measures
  • IMO bulk carrier safety package
  • Development of ILO ‘Super Convention’

Outcomes broadly based on technical merits of arguments put forward.

Industry viewpoint understood, if not always accepted.

how it is the challenges today
HOW IT IS: The Challenges Today
  • More political drivers and less consideration of the technical, operational, and commercial interests
  • More unworkable, inconsistent and illogical regulation and less consideration of the practical aspects
  • More pressure for local / regional regulation and less willingness to adopt and apply international regulation
maintaining supremacy of imo international maritime law
Maintaining Supremacy of IMO & International Maritime Law

What are the threats?

  • 15 Years Ago the United States (OPA90)
  • Today the European Union
  • Politics post Erika and Prestige
  • Conflict with International legislation (UNCLOS, MARPOL)
  • Criminalisation
  • EU Commission proposals for EU Common Position at IMO
maintaining supremacy of imo international maritime law19
Maintaining Supremacy of IMO & International Maritime Law

International Regulation for an International Industry

What the industry seeks from the Asian region:

  • Consistent support for IMO and the international approach
  • Rejection of regional initiatives
  • If possible, avoidance of “block” voting to combat EU moves in this direction
  • Traditionally accidents have been regarded as quite distinct from deliberate acts
  • Attitudes have changed (scapegoat mentality)
  • e.g. Captain Mangouras, The Karachi Eight
  • EU Directive on Ship-Source Pollution (despite wide industry coalition)
  • Canadian Bill C-15
  • US approach (whistle blowing, enormous fines and rewards)
  • INDUSTRY supports the investigation and prosecution of illegal discharges of oil from ships.
  • INDUSTRY strongly objects to criminalising accidental oil pollution and to treating seafarers as criminals
  • Any criminal offence of pollution from a ship must be clearly defined and in accordance with international law.
  • Any penalties imposed on someone found guilty of such an offence must be proportionate.
  • There should also be parity with any penalties imposed for pollution from land based sources.
  • Any suspects must be treated fairly, impartially and in accordance with international law on human rights.


  • INDUSTRY expects coastal states to comply with their existing treaty law obligations to provide adequate, affordable, oil waste reception facilities.
  • In order to safeguard the lives of seafarers and the marine environment, INDUSTRY urges coastal states to ensure proper contingency plans are put in place so that adequate assistance and if necessary a place of refuge can be made available to a ship in distress.

Challenges to Industry Governance Structures:


Classification Societies

Port State Control

P&I Clubs

challenges for flag
Challenges for Flag:
  • IMO Flag State Audit (currently voluntary but pressure to make mandatory)
  • Port State Control
  • - Currently: white, black and grey lists
  • - EU moving to target non-audited flags with preferential treatment measures
  • Political, public, union and media pressures – especially on open registers
  • Industry currently providing guidance / recommendations, and moving to do more
challenges for classification societies
Challenges for Classification Societies:
  • EU Challenge on Role of Class
  • – perceived conflict of interest between statutory and classification activities
  • Common Structural Rules
  • – ability to deliver while maintaining IACS harmony
  • Role relative to Goal Based Standards
  • – IMO/Flag states versus IACS control of Goal Based Standards
  • Who sets class agenda – owners, builders, flag states or class managers ?
  • Example coatings standards (IMO – DE discussion)
challenges for port state control psc
Challenges for Port State Control (PSC)

What is needed :

  • Better harmonisation and consistency of standards, training, etc. across all PSC regimes
  • Consistency in inspection and targeting criteria – based in part on analysis of PSC records and not arbitrary mechansisms, such as quota systems
  • Global sharing and mutual recognition of records between MoUs, with data logged in central system such as EQUASIS
  • Uniformity in internal procedures, such as clear grounds for detention, independent appeal panels, close-out of deficiencies, etc.


  • To ensure that the integrity of PSC is maintained
challenges for p i clubs club boards
Challenges for P&I Clubs& Club Boards:
  • OECD Report – Role of P&I in respect of substandard shipping
  • IOPC Revision Procedures
  • Pending Compulsory Insurance requirements
  • Who manages the agenda
  • – Shipowners or Club Managers ?
people issues human factors
  • Heavy recent concentration on “hardware” issues
  • (e.g. accelerated phase-out, CSRs, goal-based standards etc)
  • Yet people still “cause” most incidents
people issues human factors32

Industry has to address :

  • Shortages of qualified officers (BIMCO/ISF 2005)
  • Renewed criticisms of training standards (time to review STCW 95 ?)
  • Implications/causes of fatigue (ISPS etc.)
  • Manning levels
piracy armed sea robbery
Piracy/Armed Sea Robbery:
  • Extent of the problem
  • Focus of attention on Regions
  • - Malacca Straits
  • - Somalia
  • - West Africa
  • Developments
the reality
The Reality:
  • Attacks have become more violent
  • Attackers have become bolder – large ships attacked
  • Attacks are motivated by financial gain not for political reasons
  • The Straits are a crucial route for the world’s shipping therefor the area is uniquely sensitive
the reality cont
The Reality (cont):
  • MSSI
  • The Batam Statement
  • Tripartite Techical Experts Group on safety of navigation
  • Tripartite Technical Experts Group on security in the Straits
  • The Jakarta Statement
  • Increased Cooperation
  • More patrols?
  • Better coordination of resources to tackle the root of the problem, i.e. ashore?
  • Cross boarder patrols – bilateral agreements? Indonesia-Malaysia – up to 5 miles?
  • ”Eyes in the sky” – is this 24/7?
the perception
The perception:
  • Is enough being done?
  • Lack of clarity on the recent initiatives? What is in place and what is proposed?
  • That the listing of the region as a ”war risk” area has brought a reaction from the littoral states
intertanko s view
  • Recent initiatives must be built upon
  • Support the role of the IMO as a facilitator of open discussions
  • Welcomed the open dialogue in Jakarta
  • Better accessibility of information on the initiatives taken – transparency is crucial
  • Support the political advance in internationalising the issue
jwc listed areas
JWC – Listed Areas
  • JWC should consult more widely
  • Review their decision on the basis of the factual situation
  • Follow closely all initiatives by the littoral states
in conclusion
In conclusion:

The shipping industry is vital to the global economy. All those involved in the shipping industry must strive for an industry that is:

  • Responsible
  • Respected
  • Sustainable
  • Able to influence its own destiny
ship operators alone cannot safeguard the marine environment

Ship operators alone cannot safeguard the marine environment

All parts of the shipping industry must be responsible and seek to continuously improve


Commitment to Continuous Improvement by all stakeholders in the maritime businesses




Equipment Suppliers

Financiers / Guarantors





Hull insurers

Cargo Owners


Flag states

Waterways authorities

Coastal States

Ports & Terminals

Labour providers

Tug operators

Bunker suppliers




Paint Suppliers


Spill Response

Ship Breakers

tanker event 2006
Tanker Event 2006


29-31 March 2005

The Poseidon Challenge

and finally
And finally:

It is our seafarers to whom we are indebited, it is their dedication and professionalism often in the face of adversity that deserves our whole hearted appreciation. We salute them.

thank you

Thank you