1 / 13

These Slide Should be Viewed in Presentation Mode, One Screen Build at a Time

These Slide Should be Viewed in Presentation Mode, One Screen Build at a Time. The Learning Community. Notes from the Edge. Outline. Representation and Local Control What’s the Problems to be “Solved”? Financial Shenanigans Choose Our Fate. Representation & Local Control.

dillon
Download Presentation

These Slide Should be Viewed in Presentation Mode, One Screen Build at a Time

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. These Slide Should be Viewed in Presentation Mode,One Screen Build at a Time

  2. The Learning Community Notes from the Edge

  3. Outline • Representation and Local Control • What’s the Problems to be “Solved”? • Financial Shenanigans • Choose Our Fate

  4. Representation & Local Control • Unique government layer for two of Nebraska’s 93 counties • Representation: • Sarpy Co. is part of two of six election districts • The “Mighty U-hook” • The “Bellevue domain” • Limited voting: You didn’t vote for half of the people elected. • Sub-district Achievement Councils -- power behind the throne • Local taxing authority removed, transferred to Learning Community Coordinating Council. • $.95, core funds from ESUs, construction, Elementary Learning Centers, misc.

  5. What’s the Problems to be “Solved”? • No legislator can say: Either won’t or can’t. • Eliminate disharmony • Encroachment on small district boundaries • (Omaha) civic pride – be “innovative” • Dismal group performance – based on race • Economic status substituted for race • The “Achievement Gap”

  6. The Achievement “Gap” School ABC School XYZ Student A Score: 95 Rich Student F Score: 40 Poor Student B Score: 80 Rich Student G Score: 60 Rich Student C Score: 80 Poor Student H Score: 50 Rich Student D Score: 65 Rich Student I Score: 80 Poor Student E Score: 90 Rich Student J Score: 70 Poor School ABC’s Avg. Test Score: 82 Classified as a Rich school: 20% Poor School XYZ’s Avg. Test Score: 60 Classified as a Poor school: 60% Poor The Achievement “Gap” is 22%

  7. The Learning Community “Solution”(Entice students to bus to another school) School ABC School XYZ Student A Score: 95 Rich Student F Score: 40 Poor Student B Score: 80 Rich Student G Score: 60 Rich Student C Score: 80 Poor Student H Score: 50 Rich Student D Score: 65 Rich Student I Score: 80 Poor Student E Score: 90 Rich Student J Score: 70 Poor School ABC’s Avg. Test Score: 71 Classified as a Poor school: 40% Poor School XYZ’s Avg. Test Score: 71 Classified as a Poor school: 40% Poor No Academic Improvement Occurs! The Achievement “Gap” is 0%... Problem Solved!...

  8. The Learning Community “Solution”(Year Two: Students Change Economic Status) School ABC School XYZ Student A Score: 95 Rich Student K Score: 45 Poor Student G Score: 60 Rich Student C Score: 80 Rich Student C Score: 80 Poor Student H Score: 50 Rich Student D Score: 65 Rich Student I Score: 80 Poor Student E Score: 90 Rich Student J Score: 70 Poor Student F Score: 40 Poor Student B Score: 80 Rich School ABC’s Avg. Test Score: 75 Classified as a Rich school: 33% Poor School XYZ’s Avg. Test Score: 61 Classified as a Poor school: 40% Poor The Achievement “Gap” returns!... 14% Student Economic Status Changes: 45% per year; 70% per 3 years Students Continue to Move into Poor Areas

  9. Financials • To pay for this, adjustment to State Aid Formula floated. However, opposed vehemently by Lincoln & out-state. • Re-tooled funding source: • Sarpy County included in “Metro area solution” as a funding source. • Sarpy Co. taxpayers pay the same (or more), but receive less tax dollars going to school instruction • Two-county area loss of $8 Million of tax dollars to out-state. Overall taxes do not decrease. • New transportation mandate and “diversity plan” will siphon instructional dollars to social goals. • Overhead of new layer of government siphons instructional dollars. • Insolvency for some school districts (after hold-harmless period expires).

  10. Insolvency for Some Districts

  11. Choose Our Fate • Change nothing: • The default action. • Measures will show lower overall achievement; decrease in rate of growth for individual students • Decreased support for government schools – but with no alternatives • Wander around, spend money, claim some success with “more work to do”

  12. Choose Our Fate • Attempt to change situation: • Difficult with current representative environment • Lawsuit – limited prediction of success • Change the terms, place, and volume – become “inharmonious” • Other ideas?

More Related