260 likes | 359 Views
Tentative ASW Timeline - 2014 - 2015. The timeline below represents a TENTATIVE ASW Timeline for the Fall 2014 semester. The timeline below represents a TENTATIVE ASW Timeline for the Fall 2014 semester.
E N D
The timeline below represents a TENTATIVE ASW Timeline for the Fall 2014 semester.
The timeline below represents a TENTATIVE ASW Timeline for the Fall 2014 semester.
Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process
Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process
Collection Method • Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting: • Pre Test • Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf • Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdfsdf;dfmsdf;sdfsdfmsdflmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk • Ljdflkjfljkdlkjsdftjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkwklweljsdfljsdfsdljsdfljsdf • Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf • Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdfsdf;dfmsdf;sdfsdfmsdflmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk • Ljdflkjfljkdlkjsdftjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkwklweljsdfljsdfsdljsdfljsdf • Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf
Collection Method→ File Size • Up to 10 MB per file! • Pre Test • Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf • Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdfsdf;dfmsdf;sdfsdfmsdflmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk • Ljdflkjfljkdlkjsdftjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkwklweljsdfljsdfsdljsdfljsdf • Sljd
Blind Review The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists. E D M Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Blind Review The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Blind Review If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year. M M Reviewer #1 Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #2
Blind Review If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. M E Reviewer #3 Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Blind Review 2-Step ASW Process ReviewThese will be explained in detail in later modules. #2 ASW Quality Rubric #1Evidence Collection Checklist
Blind Review Summer 2015 Content area specialists complete the review process. Qualifications Application Training
Receive Rating Evidence Collection Rating Form: • D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth
Receive Rating Evidence Collection Rating Form: • D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: D M M M E
Receive Rating Synthesis table to determine Standard 6 rating a a
Receive Rating Fall 2015 Teachers receive their Standard 6 ratings for 2014-2015.
Lessons Learned from Pilots • Work together across content areas • Focus on the philosophy behind the standards and objectives and how to assess them in your classroom • Know your guidance chart and standards well