1 / 9

Reducing Pesticide Drift: Measures of Performance

Reducing Pesticide Drift: Measures of Performance. Paul Gosselin Chief Deputy Director California Department of Pesticide Regulation September 5, 2001. Nozzle, bozzle. Droplet, schmoplet. What’s it all mean to me?. Technology v. Enforceability.

dick
Download Presentation

Reducing Pesticide Drift: Measures of Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reducing Pesticide Drift:Measures of Performance Paul Gosselin Chief Deputy Director California Department of Pesticide Regulation September 5, 2001

  2. Nozzle, bozzle.Droplet, schmoplet.What’s it all mean to me?

  3. Technology v. Enforceability • Years of research have revolutionized pesticide application • Decisions once based on seat-of-the-pants judgements and a finger (or burning tire) to the wind are increasingly based on scientific instruments and precise equations • But are they enforceable?

  4. Technology v. Enforceability • Making the profession more scientific also makes it more complex • The more complex it becomes, the more difficult to enforce in the field • Is it so complicated that we suffer from an epidemic of inadvertent noncompliance?

  5. Yin v. Yang • On the other hand, making things too simple reduces flexibility • Precise, cookbook rules to prevent drift have a high cost in efficacy and ignore years of scientific research designed to provide both efficacy and protection

  6. It’s Different in the Field • Many engineering specifications--like application pressure--impossible to determine after an application is completed • Other elements--droplet size, for example--not feasible for enforcement personnel to determine even during an application • Location where wind speed is to be monitored impossible to define in a way that definitively prevents drift

  7. It’s Different in the Field • Whether or not an application meets technical specifications is difficult to determine even during an application, much less afterwards • Even if enforcement personnel conclude that applicators followed all the detailed technical specs in new regulations, it wouldn’t necessarily follow that they exercised “due care”

  8. What to Do? • There needs to be scientific consensus whether controlling average droplet size is the best approach • Does it work? Can we enforce it? Will it prevent drift? At what cost? • Using a drift spectrum or percent fine spray approach needs further definition

  9. What to Do? • Link performance standards based on the best technology to certification standards • We need to pay greater attention to checking equipment specifications in both routine inspections and episode investigations • We need to dictate technical specifications, and mandatory equipment inspections to make sure that operators are following them

More Related