Understanding your top from your bottom a guide to michigan s accountability system
Download
1 / 38

- PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 114 Views
  • Uploaded on

Understanding Your Top from Your Bottom: A Guide to Michigan’s Accountability System. September 2013 Mitch Fowler fowlerm@calhounisd.org. Agenda. Scorecard Overview Scorecard Components Top to Bottom Overview Understanding Z-Scores Z-Score Components. Outcomes. Participants will:

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '' - dexter-garrison


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Understanding your top from your bottom a guide to michigan s accountability system

Understanding Your Top from Your Bottom: A Guide to Michigan’s Accountability System

September 2013

Mitch Fowler

fowlerm@calhounisd.org


Agenda
Agenda

Scorecard Overview

Scorecard Components

Top to Bottom Overview

Understanding Z-Scores

Z-Score Components


Outcomes
Outcomes

Participants will:

Identify Scorecard Components and Scoring Guidelines

Complete an Audit to Identify Areas of Concern

Understand Top to Bottom Components and Scoring Guidelines

Complete a Top to Bottom Audit to Identify Areas of Concern

Identify Resources from BAA (TTB Lookup Tool, BTO Look Up Tool, Focus Achievement Gap Tool)




Scorecard availability
Scorecard Availability

Available on BAA Secure Site

Available on MI School Data (Public or Secure)



Scorecard components
Scorecard Components

Proficiency

  • Based on Annual Measurable Objectives

  • Must be at 85% Proficient by 2022 in ALL Areas and Subgroups

    Participation

  • Must Test 95% of Students

    Completion Rate

  • Graduation / Attendance Rate

    Other Factors

  • SIP / DIP

  • Educator Evaluations


Scorecard components proficiency
Scorecard Components - Proficiency

Annual Measurable

Objectives (AMO)




Scorecard components proficiency2
Scorecard Components - Proficiency

All Students made the 20.94% proficiency mark… 2 points.

The Bottom 30% of students did not meet the 20.94% proficiency mark… 0 points.



Scorecard components proficiency4
Scorecard Components - Proficiency

1 = Top 30%

2 = Middle 40%

3 = Bottom 30%



Scorecard components proficiency5
Scorecard Components - Proficiency

Of the 33 proficient students, 18 were provisional… they received a 3.







Scorecard components completion rate
Scorecard Components – Completion Rate

Completion Rate

OR

Attendance Rate





Scorecard decision tree
Scorecard Decision Tree

http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/ScorecardOverallColorDecisionTree_433459_7.pdf



Top to bottom availability
Top to Bottom Availability

Available via the BAA Look Up Tool

  • (On the BAA Website Here)

    Available on MI School Data (Public or Secure)


Top to bottom ranking
Top to Bottom Ranking

Schools are compared to other schools in the state by utilizing z-scores (a statistical measure that describes how far you are from the middle of the pack).

Z-scores that are positive, show that you are above the 50th percentile when compared to the state. Z-scores that are negative, show that you are below the 50th percentile when compared to the state.


Z scores standard deviations
Z-scores (Standard Deviations)

State Average

Z-score = Zero

-1

-3

-2

1

2

3

0.5

-0.5

98%

84%

68%

32%

50%

16%

2%

Percentile

State Average

Slide courtesy of Doug Greer, Ottawa ISD

Z-scores are centered around zero or the “state average”

Positive is ABOVE the state avg.

Negative is BELOW the state avg.


Z score structure
Z-Score Structure

  • Overall Ranking

  • Subject Area

  • Z- scores

  • Subject Area

  • Sub Z-Scores

  • Weight

  • Achievement

  • 50%

  • Science

  • Improvement

  • 25%

  • Math

  • Achievement Gap

  • 25%

  • Reading

  • 33rd

  • Writing

  • Social Studies

  • Graduation


Top to bottom report mi school data
Top to Bottom Report (MI School Data)

Subject Area Sub Z-Scores

Overall Rank

Subject Area Z-Scores


Accountability labels priority focus reward
Accountability Labels (Priority, Focus, Reward)

Achievement Gap z-score (Focus)

Overall Rank (Priority or Reward) Top or Bottom 5%



How close to focus are we
How Close to Focus Are We?

Achievement Gap Z-Scores

Focus Cut Off

School’s Location

http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/2013_Individual_School_Gap_Lookup_Tool_431296_7.xls


Ttb resources and look up tools
TTB Resources and Look Up Tools

http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,4615,7-140-22709_59490---,00.html



Thank you questions

Thank YouQuestions?

Mitch Fowler

School Data Consultant

fowlerm@calhounisd.org