1 / 20

CAS Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 11, 2001

CAS Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 11, 2001. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR. Kevin M. Madigan MHL/Paratus. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR. May have significant Asbestos pure IBNR exposure

devon
Download Presentation

CAS Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 11, 2001

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CAS Casualty Loss Reserve SeminarSeptember 11, 2001 Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR Kevin M. Madigan MHL/Paratus

  2. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • May have significant Asbestos pure IBNR exposure • Have significant policy data issues • e.g., old policies/slips not in systems • Lack valuable qualitative information High Excess (Re)Insurers:

  3. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Research known asbestos defendants • Match against policy database • May take significant effort to build DB • Use historical experience to project IBNR How to Deal With These Issues?

  4. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • We have developed 2 report year methods inspired by: Using Experience to Project Pure IBNR • [1] Cross, Susan L. and Doucette, John P., “Measurement of Asbestos Bodily Injury Liabilities”, PCAS, Vol LXXXIV, Nos. 160 and 161, pgs 187 -300 • [2] Haidu, Jim, “Estimating a Reinsurer’s Liabilities for Asbestos and Environmental Losses”, 1996 CAS CLRS

  5. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Both methods use (report year) actual or modeled losses to arrive at a factor that is applied to exposed policy limits Using Experience to Project Pure IBNR • We are implicitly assuming the existence of modeled losses at the account or policy level • We are modeling GROSS losses

  6. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR Using Experience to Project Pure IBNR • Method 1 uses account experience • Method 2 uses policy experience • Should any of the historical experience be excluded?

  7. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • “Pricing” Approach Method I: • Allocate experience to layers • Calculate burn rates • Apply to potential IBNR policies

  8. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Allocate experience to layers Method I: • Each account has an actual (closed accounts) or modeled (open accounts) annual loss distribution

  9. ABC Asbestos Co. Insulations R Us Acme Widgets Burn Rate Account: TOTAL Annual Loss: $35,000,000 $16,000,000 $250,000 $51,250,000 Layers $0 $500,000 $500,000 $0 $250,000 $750,000 50.00% $500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 33.33% $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 33.33% $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 33.33% $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $10,000,000 33.33% $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $20,000,000 66.67% $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $11,000,000 36.67% Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Calculation of Burn Rates Method I: • Example for Report Year 19XX

  10. Layer RY 1990 RY 1991 RY 1992 $0 $500,000 45% 70% 46% 67% 40% 80% $500,000 $1,000,000 44% 68% 46% 67% 40% 80% $1,000,000 $5,000,000 42% 64% 25% 52% 40% 80% $5,000,000 $10,000,000 23% 45% 12% 40% 35% 78% $10,000,000 $20,000,000 15% 34% 1% 5% 30% 75% $20,000,000 $30,000,000 2% 16% 0% 0% 12% 46% $30,000,000 $40,000,000 1% 10% 0% 0% 3% 37% Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Calculation of Burn Rates Method I: • Ideally want burn rate confidence intervals, from which baseline confidence intervals can be selected for each layer Burn Rate Confidence Intervals

  11. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Apply Burn Rates to potential IBNR policies Method I: • Requires assumptions regarding: • Reporting Pattern(s) • Trend Assumptions • e.g., 2% annual decay in burn rate • Exposed Policy Limits

  12. Year % Reported Trend Factor Projected Ultimate Losses 1 10.4% 0.980 $13,200,299 2 9.4% 0.960 $11,717,663 3 8.5% 0.941 $10,424,130 4 7.7% 0.922 $9,291,765 5 7.1% 0.904 $8,297,446 6 6.4% 0.886 $7,421,905 7 5.9% 0.868 $6,648,983 8 5.4% 0.851 $5,965,055 9 4.9% 0.834 $5,358,567 10 4.5% 0.817 $4,819,680 11 4.2% 0.801 $4,339,976 12 3.8% 0.785 $3,912,226 13 3.5% 0.769 $3,530,194 14 3.3% 0.754 $3,188,488 15 3.0% 0.739 $2,882,427 16 2.8% 0.724 $2,607,937 17 2.6% 0.709 $2,361,460 18 2.4% 0.695 $2,139,885 19 2.2% 0.681 $1,940,481 20 2.0% 0.668 $1,760,847 $111,809,413 TOTAL: Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR Lower limit of C.I. of Burn Rate for Layer: 26% Exposure in Layer: $500,000,000 • Apply Burn Rates Method I:

  13. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR Comparison of Methods: • Method I computes an annual ‘rate’ for each layer, and ‘charges’ the exposed policies the corresponding ‘price’. • Method II computes one factor to be applied to the limits of each policy

  14. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • We have a wide assortment of attachment points and policy limits, so it hardly seems right to apply the same factor to each policy. • Does a $25M x $200M policy have the same exposure to loss as a $4M x $1M policy? • Of course not! • But wait!

  15. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR Exposed policy limits are ‘adjusted’ as follows: Method II: Adjusted exposure = TPE * Pr( GUL > AP) where: TPE = Total Policy Exposure GUL = Ground-Up Loss AP = Policy Attachment Point

  16. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Calculate historical ratios of loss to adjusted exposure for each report year (let’s call them loss cost factors) Method II: • Select a base line confidence interval for the loss cost factors • Make assumptions regarding reporting pattern(s) and cost trend(s)

  17. Adjusted Exposure Policy Att Point Pr(GUL > AP) Policy Limit Policy Loss $1,000,000 40.0% $500,000 $200,000 $2,500 $1,000,000 40.0% $1,500,000 $600,000 $2,500 $5,000,000 30.0% $4,000,000 $1,200,000 $0 $10,000,000 20.0% $15,000,000 $3,000,000 $0 $15,000,000 10.0% $5,000,000 $500,000 $5,000,000 $20,000,000 5.0% $5,000,000 $250,000 $0 $25,000,000 1.0% $25,000,000 $250,000 $1,000 TOTALS: $6,000,000 $5,006,000 LOSS COST FACTOR: 0.834 Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Calculate ratios of loss to adjusted exposure Method II: • Example: RY 19xx

  18. Year % Reported Trend Factor Product 1 10.4% 0.980 0.102 2 9.4% 0.960 0.090 3 8.5% 0.941 0.080 4 7.7% 0.922 0.071 5 7.1% 0.904 0.064 6 6.4% 0.886 0.057 7 5.9% 0.868 0.051 8 5.4% 0.851 0.046 9 4.9% 0.834 0.041 10 4.5% 0.817 0.037 11 4.2% 0.801 0.033 12 3.8% 0.785 0.030 13 3.5% 0.769 0.027 14 3.3% 0.754 0.025 15 3.0% 0.739 0.022 16 2.8% 0.724 0.020 17 2.6% 0.709 0.018 18 2.4% 0.695 0.016 19 2.2% 0.681 0.015 20 2.0% 0.668 0.014 0.717 Trended Projected Loss Cost Factor: Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR 0.834 Baseline Loss Cost Factor: Method II: • Select a base line for the loss cost factors 0.860

  19. Adjusted Exposure Projected Losses Att Point Pr(GUL > AP) Limit $25,000,000 1.000% $5,000,000 $50,000 $35,850 $40,000,000 0.800% $10,000,000 $80,000 $57,360 $75,000,000 0.600% $25,000,000 $150,000 $107,550 $125,000,000 0.400% $25,000,000 $100,000 $71,700 $250,000,000 0.325% $50,000,000 $162,500 $116,513 TOTALS: $115,000,000 $542,500 $388,973 Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR Method II: • Make assumptions regarding reporting pattern(s) and cost trend(s) Trended Projected Loss Cost Factor: 0.717 Potential Policies

  20. Reserving for Asbestos Pure IBNR • Loss trend may be (probably is?) positive, or trend rate may not be constant • Policy “buy backs” • Distinguish products liability from other liability • Not only source of “pure” IBNR • Commutation strategy • Reinsurance collections/collectibility Other Issues:

More Related