1 / 70

Chapter 18

Chapter 18. Biological Classification. Key Ideas. Explain why biologists have taxonomic systems Explain what makes up the scientific name of a species Describe the structure of the modern Linnaean system of classification. The Need for Systems.

devon
Download Presentation

Chapter 18

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 18 Biological Classification

  2. Key Ideas • Explain why biologists have taxonomic systems • Explain what makes up the scientific name of a species • Describe the structure of the modern Linnaean system of classification

  3. The Need for Systems • About 1.7 million species have been named and described by scientists. • Scientists think that millions more are undiscovered. • The practice of naming and classifying organisms is called taxonomy.

  4. The Need for Systems, continued • Biologists use taxonomic systems to organize their knowledge of organisms. • These systems attempt to provide consistent ways to name and categorize organisms. • do not use common names, which may be confusing because they are different in different places.

  5. The Need for Systems, continued • Taxonomic systems use categories to organize organisms. • group organisms into large categories as well as smaller, more specific categories. • The general term for any one of these categories is a taxon (plural, taxa).

  6. Scientific Nomenclature • Various naming systems were invented in the early days of European biology. • Names for taxa were inconsistent between these systems. • The only taxon which was consistent was the genus, which was a taxon used to group similar species.

  7. Scientific Nomenclature, continued • A simpler and more consistent system was developed by Swedish biologist Carl Linnaeus in the 1750s. • Linnaeus introduced a two-word naming system called binomial nomenclature. • included the genus name and a single descriptive word for each species.

  8. Scientific Nomenclature, continued • Linnaeus’ basic approach has been universally adopted. • The unique, two-part name for a species is now called a scientific name.

  9. Scientific Nomenclature, continued Naming Rules • No two species can have the same scientific name. • All scientific names are made up of two Latin or Latin-like terms. • All the members of a genus share the genus name as the first term. • The second term is called the species identifier, and is often descriptive.

  10. Scientific Nomenclature, continued • For example, the scientific name Apis mellifera belongs to the European honeybee. • The term mellifera derives from the Latin word for honey. • the genus name should be capitalized and the species identifier should be lowercase. • Both terms should be italicized.

  11. The Linnaean System • Linnaeus devised a system to classify all plants and animals that were known during his time. • organisms are grouped at successive levels of the hierarchy based on similarities in their form and structure. • The eight basic levels of modern classification are domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species.

  12. Biological Hierarchy of Classification

  13. The Linnaean System, continued • Each level has its own set of names for taxa at that level. • Each taxon is identified based on shared traits. • Similar species are grouped into a genus; similar genera are grouped into a family; and so on up to the level of domain.

  14. Classification of a Bee

  15. The Linnaean System, continued • The category domain has been invented since Linnaeus’ time. • recognizes the most basic differences among cell types. • All living things are now grouped into one of three domains.

  16. The Linnaean System, continued • The category kingdom encompasses large groups, such as plants, animals, or fungi. • Six kingdoms fit within the three domains. • A phylum is a subgroup within kingdom. • A class is a subgroup within a phylum.

  17. The Linnaean System, continued • An order is a subgroup within a class. • A family is a subgroup within an order. • A genus (plural, genera) is a subgroup within family. • Each genus is made up of species with uniquely shared traits, such that the species are thought to be closely related.

  18. The Linnaean System, continued • A species is usually defined as a unique group of organisms united by heredity or interbreeding. • In practice, scientists tend to define species based on unique features. • For example, Homo sapiens is recognized as the only living primate species that walks upright and uses spoken language.

  19. Section 2: Modern Systematics

  20. Key Ideas • What problems arise when scientists try to group organisms by apparent similarities? • Is the evolutionary past reflected in modern systematics? • How is cladistics used to construct evolutionary relationships? • What evidence do scientists use to analyze these relationships?

  21. Traditional Systematics • Scientists have traditionally used similarities in appearance and structure to group organisms. However, this approach has been problematic. • Some groups look similar but turn out to be distantly related. • Other groups look different but turn out to be closely related.

  22. Traditional Systematics, continued • For example, dinosaurs were once seen as a group of reptiles that became extinct millions of years ago. • Birds were seen as a separate, modern group that was not related to any reptile group. • Fossil evidence has convinced scientists that birds evolved from one of the many lineages of dinosaurs. • Some scientists classify birds as a subgroup of dinosaurs.

  23. Phylogenetics • Scientists who study systematics are interested in phylogeny, or the ancestral relationships between species. • Grouping organisms by similarity is often assumed to reflect phylogeny, but inferring phylogeny is complex in practice. • Reconstructing a species’ phylogeny is like trying to draw a huge family tree over millions of generations.

  24. Phylogenetics, continued • Not all similar characteristics are inherited from a common ancestor. • Consider the wings of an insect and the wings of a bird. • Both enable flight, but the structures of the two wings differ. • Fossil evidence also shows that insects with wings existed long before birds appeared.

  25. Phylogenetics, continued • Through the process of convergent evolution, similarities may evolve in groups that are not closely related. • Similar features may evolve because the groups have adopted similar habitats or lifestyles. • Similarities that arise through convergent evolution are called analogous characters.

  26. Phylogenetics, continued • Grouping organisms by similarities is subjective. • Some scientists may think one character is important, while another scientist does not. • For example, systematists historically placed birds in a separate class from reptiles, giving importance to characters like feathers.

  27. Phylogenetics, continued • Fossil evidence now shows that birds are considered part of the “family tree” of dinosaurs. • This family tree, or phylogenetic tree, represents a hypothesis of the relationships between several groups.

  28. Cladistics • Cladistics is a method of analysis that infers phylogenies by careful comparisons of shared characteristics. • Cladistics is an objective method that unites systematics with phylogenetics. • Cladistic analysis is used to select the most likely phylogeny among a given set of organisms.

  29. Cladistics, continued • Cladistics focuses on finding characters that are shared between different groups because of shared ancestry. • A shared character is defined as ancestral if it is thought to have evolved in a common ancestor of both groups. • A derived character is one that evolved in one group but not the other.

  30. Cladistics, continued • For example, the production of seeds is a character that is present in all living conifers and flowering plants, and some prehistoric plants. • Seed production is a shared ancestral character among those groups. • The production of flowers is a derived character that is only shared by flowering plants.

  31. Cladistics, continued • Cladistics infers relatedness by identifying shared derived and ancestral characters among groups, while avoiding analogous characters. • Scientists construct a cladogram to show relationships between groups. • A cladogram is a phylogenetic tree that is drawn in a specific way.

  32. Cladistics, continued • Organisms are grouped together through identification of their shared derived characters. • All groups that arise from one point on a cladogram belong to a clade. • A clade is a set of groups that are related by descent from a single ancestral lineage.

  33. Cladistics, continued • Each clade is usually compared with an outgroup, or group that lacks some of the shared characteristics. • The next slide shows a cladogram of different types of plants. • Conifers and flowering plants form a clade. • Ferns form the outgroup.

  34. Cladogram: Major Groups of Plants

  35. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness • Phylogenetics relies heavily on data about characters that are either present or absent in taxa. • But other kinds of data are also important. • Biologists compare many kinds of evidence and apply logic carefully in order to infer phylogenies. • Scientists also revise phylogenies based on new evidence.

  36. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued Morphological Evidence • Morphology refers to the physical structure or anatomy of organisms. • Large-scale morphological evidence, like seeds and flowers, have been well studied. • Scientists must look carefully at similar traits, to avoid using analogous characters for classification.

  37. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued • An important part of morphology in multicellular species is the pattern of development from embryo to adult. • Organisms that share ancestral genes often show similarities during the process of development. • For example, the jaw of an adult develops from the same part of an embryo in every vertebrate species.

  38. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued Molecular Evidence • Scientists can now use genetic information to infer phylogenies. • Recall that as genes are passed on from generation to generation, mutations occur. • Some mutations may be passed on to all species that have a common ancestor.

  39. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued • Genetic sequence data are now used widely for cladistic analysis. • First, the sequence of DNA bases in a gene (or of amino acids in a protein) is determined for several species. • Then, each letter (or amino acid) at each position is compared.

  40. Similarities in Amino Acid Sequences

  41. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued • At the level of genomes, alleles may be lost or added over time. • Another form of molecular evidence is the presence or absence of specific alleles—or the proteins that result from them. • From this evidence, the relative timing between genetic changes can be inferred.

  42. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued Evidence of Order and Time • Cladistics can determine only the relative order of divergence, or branching, in a phylogenetic tree. • The fossil record can often be used to infer the actual time when a group may have begun to “branch off.” • For example, using cladistics, scientists have identified lancelets as the closest relative of vertebrates.

  43. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued • The oldest known fossils of vertebrates are about 450 million years old. • But the oldest lancelet fossils are 535 million years old. • So, these two lineages must have diverged more than 535 million years ago.

  44. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued • DNA mutations occur at relatively constant rates, so they can be used as an approximate “genetic clock.” • Scientists can measure the genetic differences between taxa and estimate time of divergence.

  45. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness, continued Inference Using Parsimony • Modern systematists use the principle of parsimony to construct phylogenetic trees. • This principle holds that the simplest explanation for something is the most reasonable, unless strong evidence exists against that explanation. • Given two possible cladograms, the one that implies the fewest character changes between points is preferred.

  46. Section 3: Kingdoms and Domains

  47. Key Ideas • Have biologists always recognized the same kingdoms? • What are the domains and kingdoms of the three-domain system of classification?

  48. Updating Classification Systems • For many years after Linnaeus created his system, scientists only recognized two kingdoms: Plantae and Animalia. • Biologists have added complexity and detail to classification systems as they have learned more. • Many new taxa have been proposed, and some have been reclassified.

  49. Updating Classification Systems, continued • Sponges, for example, used to be classified as plants. • Microscopes allowed scientists to study sponge cells. • Scientists learned that sponge cells are much more like animal cells, so today sponges are classified as animals.

  50. Updating Classification Systems, continued • In the 1800s, scientists added Kingdom Protista as a taxon for unicellular organisms. • Soon, they noticed differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. • Scientists created Kingdom Monera for prokaryotes.

More Related