market values in preservation n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Market Values in Preservation PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Market Values in Preservation

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 14

Market Values in Preservation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Market Values in Preservation. Private Sector Involvement in Historic Preservation. What are the public and private sectors.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Market Values in Preservation' - deron

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
market values in preservation

Market Values in Preservation

Private Sector Involvement in Historic Preservation

what are the public and private sectors
What are the public and private sectors

With the development of government funding for cultural and environmental activities the playing field was conceptually divided between publicly-funded efforts and market-driven activity.

preservation always has been presently is and always will be primarily a matter of market economics
Preservation always has been, presently is, and always will be primarily a matter of market economics
  • Historic preservation can rarely succeed unless both public and private sectors are operating together in a mutually supportive manner.

a. Robert Stipe acknowledges that pride of ownership may generate some preservation activity.b. However, he asserts, the preservation or loss of cultural property is almost always the result of economic feast or famine in the local real estate market.

High value risks destruction, low value risks neglect.

why is this about money
Why is this about money?

Approaches to preservation are an attempt to subsidize the cost of maintaining an economically unproductive piece of real estate, however important it may be in a cultural or environmental sense.

This conclusion makes an exception of private homes, museums, public buildings

This condition has the unexpected consequence of (liberal) government funding been to monetarize heritage and other quality of life issues.

grants and loans
Grants and Loans

Why does Bob Stipe call this “front-door” assistance?

Funds are debated and allocated in public as part of a political process through which citizens have an opportunity to participate, directly or through elected representatives, in a fair and open forum that decides how they are to be taxed and how their money is spent.

what are back door assistance methods
What are “back-door” assistance methods?

Tax relief or incentives are considered “back door”

How are these funds are off budget and politically easier to obtain?

Both forms of assistance work well is unquestioned.

competing agendas apply to funding and to the building stock
Competing agendas apply to funding and to the building stock

Concepts of Consumer fashion applies to the real estate market.

Monumental buildings are owned by institutions or individuals who are least able to maintain them, including financially pressed local governments, universities, churches, and other charitable, nonprofit enterprises that face special challenges.

What is the value of stability?Most local governments in the United States place a relatively low priority on preservation.American custom is replace rather than repair.

economic realities are code words for contested project goals
Economic realities are “code words” for contested project goals

The rule of American political process has been to create and apply tactical rather than strategic solutions.

The goal of every action is to save, or solve an immediate problem, not to educate the public and their representatives to an approach or philosophy.

Money has been the universal medium of cultural exchange in all political systems rife with competing interests.

federal preservation assistance subsidies
Federal Preservation Assistance-subsidies

Federal matching grants program to underwrite preservation projects. (What is a matching grant? See [])

Grants for the acquisition and development of historic properties. These designed to support bricks-and-mortar work on historic properties.Poorly funded. Annual appropriation rarely exceeded $50 million. Appropriations for the first ten years of the program were more frequently in the vicinity of $5-6 million yearly.

Through FY 2002, over $900 million had been appropriated for the grants program, but in terms of the total federal budget, the amount was minuscule. By comparison, the grants program of the National Endowment for the Arts received more than $4 billion during the same period.

the faucet metaphor
The faucet metaphor

Grants for survey and planning to underwrite the cost of developing state historic preservation plans and nominations to the National Register.

a. Administration, including routine office and program managementb. Certification of local governments to participate in the national historic preservation programc. Activities related to the evaluation and nomination of properties to the National Registerd. Development of statewide and regional preservation plans and planning processese. Certifying properties and projects for federal tax incentivesf. SHPO participation in the Section 106 process and related environmental review systemsg. Field surveys and research to identify and document historic properties

funding the non profit
Funding the Non-Profit

A third category was assistance to the National Trust for Historic Preservation for the conduct of its program activities.

The National Trust is a federally-chartered non-profit organization. From 1966 to 1998 it received appropriations from Congress, in 1998 the federally appropriation was ended.

Congress established the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) in 1976 with income from fees charged for offshore oil leases on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)

revision of the federal tax code to encourage private historic preservation back door
Revision of the federal tax code to encourage private historic preservation (back door)

In 1976, as part of the comprehensive Tax Reform Act, Congress amended the tax code to redress the imbalance between the tax treatment of new construction and rehabilitation of historic properties.

Long history of supporting new construction and start-up business ventures.

Removed incentive to demolish old buildings

the economic recovery tax act of 1981
The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981

This act totally transformed the economics of preservation. Until the benefits were circumscribed five years later in the Tax Reform Act of 1986, private investment in rehabilitation soared and surpassed all expectations, far exceeding the direct preservation grant funds distributed during the entire first twenty years of NHPA.

Activity declined significantly after 1986, but the incentives remain as the most important part of federal financial support.

current incentives at the federal level
Current incentives at the federal level

The current tax incentive program offers a 20 percent credit for the “certified rehabilitation” of a “certified historic structure” and a 10 percent credit for the rehabilitation of non-historic structures built before 1936.

Virginia program

Federal program