html5-img
1 / 59

SWPBS: Leadership Team Cohort #1 Year 2 Follow-up #3

SWPBS: Leadership Team Cohort #1 Year 2 Follow-up #3. George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports May4, 2007 www.pbis.org. Agenda. Welcome & Advanced Organizer 2-3 minute Team Reports Detentions & Suspensions Crisis Management

derex
Download Presentation

SWPBS: Leadership Team Cohort #1 Year 2 Follow-up #3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SWPBS:Leadership TeamCohort #1 Year 2Follow-up #3 George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports May4, 2007 www.pbis.org

  2. Agenda • Welcome & Advanced Organizer • 2-3 minute Team Reports • Detentions & Suspensions • Crisis Management • Year 1-2 Outcomes & Planning for End/Beginning of School Year • Action Planning

  3. 2nd Annual New England PBS Conference Nov 15, 2007 Near Boston Contact: Bob Putnam May Institute bputnam@mayinstitute.org

  4. BIG PICTURE:SWPBS effort is about…. • Improving general classroom & school climate & community relations • Decreasing dependence on reactive disciplinary practices • Maximizing impact of instruction to affect academic achievement • Improving behavioral supports for students with emotional & behavioral challenges • Improving efficiency of behavior related initiatives

  5. SW-PBS Logic! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

  6. TRAINING OBJECTIVES • Establish leadership team • Establish staff agreements • Build working knowledge & capacity of SW-PBS practices & systems • Develop individualized action plan for SW-PBS • Data: Discipline Data, EBS Self-Assessment Survey, Team Implementation Checklist, SET, etc. • Presentation for school • Organize for upcoming school year

  7. Review of Best Practices & Systems:Where have we been? Where are we going?

  8. Features of Successful Organizations Common Vision ORGANIZATION MEMBERS Common Experience Common Language

  9. Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement 4 PBS Elements OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

  10. Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students

  11. Prevention Logic for All(Walker et al., 1996) • Decrease development of new problem behaviors • Prevent worsening of existing problem behaviors • Redesign learning/teaching environments to eliminate triggers & maintainers of problem behaviors • Teach, monitor, & acknowledge prosocial behavior

  12. http://rtckids.fmhi.usf.eduKutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., & Lynn, N. (2006). School-based mental health: An empirical guide for decision makers.Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. Louis De la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child & Family Studies, Research & Training Center for Children’s Mental Health.http://cfs.fmhi.usf.eduDuchnowski, A. J., Kutash, K., & Romney, S., (2006). Voices from the field: A blueprint for schools to increase involvement of families who have children with emotional disturbances. Tamp, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child and Family Studies.

  13. What is RtI?

  14. RtI: Good “IDEA” Policy • Approach to increase efficiency, accountability, & impact • NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention • NOT limited to special education • NOT new • Problem solving process • Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching • Curriculum based assessment • Precision teaching • Applied behavior analysis • Demonstrations • Systemic early literacy • School-wide positive behavior support

  15. RtI Applications

  16. Academic Systems Behavioral Systems • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • High Intensity • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • Intense, durable procedures • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Universal Interventions • All students • Preventive, proactive • Universal Interventions • All settings, all students • Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success 1-5% 1-5% 5-10% 5-10% 80-90% 80-90%

  17. Team GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started” Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation

  18. School-wide Positive Behavior Support Systems Classroom Setting Systems Nonclassroom Setting Systems Individual Student Systems School-wide Systems

  19. CONCLUDING & STARTING SCHOOL YEAR:Sustainable SWPBS Practices Systems

  20. Purpose • To review guidelines for concluding & re-starting school-wide positive behavior support systems.

  21. Considerations • Students, Staff, & Parents • Returning, new, leaving, at-risk, graduating, disabilities • SW EBS Priority • New & current initiatives • Team • Membership & schedule

  22. Systems Guidelines • Work as team • Involve students, staff, parents, & community • Review expected outcomes • Make decisions based upon data

  23. Revise &/or specify new objectives, expected outcomes, & activities • Integrate EBS activities into other initiatives & projects (consolidate, prioritize, eliminate) • Develop plans for start of new & end of current year

  24. Practices Guidelines • Review data • Focus attention on what practices are effective, efficient, & relevant • Review & practice expectations • Increase use of precorrections

  25. Increase/maintain high rates of positive acknowledgements • Identify students who are unresponsive to universal/school-wide interventions & develop more specialized interventions

  26. Preparation for… • Conclusion of current school year • Start of next school year • (see worksheets)

  27. Suggested End of Year Action Planning Topics • Evaluation of what worked this year • Planning for end/start of school year • SWPBS activities for 1st day/week of school • Reporting back to staff/community • Set-up/review of data • Consideration of sec/tert practices & systems • Celebrating accomplishments/progress • “12 month activity plan,” including mtg & professional development schedule

  28. “SW-PBS Monthly Planning Guide”(Sugai Draft May 2006)

  29. Purpose • Give SWPBS leadership teams extra organizational tool for reviewing & planning their current & future implementation activities • Use self-assessment to guide teams in their action planning • “Ending & Beginning School Year”

  30. Monthly Activity Schedule

  31. Guidelines • Work as school-wide leadership team. • Begin by reviewing current behavioral data • Link all activities to measurable action plan outcomes & objectives. • Use “effectiveness, efficiency, & relevance” to judge whether activity can be implemented w/ accuracy & sustained. • Use, review, & update this planning guide at monthly team meetings. • Plan activities 12 months out.

  32. Planning Guide Self-Assessment Highlights essential SWPBS practices & systems for years 1-2 implementation F = fully in place (e.g., >80%) P = partially in place N = not in place/don’t know

  33. School-wide Systems 1. Common purpose & approach to discipline 2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors 3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior 4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior 6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation

  34. “STAFF” • State definition of SWPBS? • State purpose of SWPBS team? • State SW positive expectations? • Actively supervise in non-classroom settings? • Agree to support SWPBS action plan? • Have more positive than negative daily interactions with students? • Have opportunities to be recognized for their SWPBS efforts?

  35. “STUDENTS” • State SW positive expectations & give contextually appropriate behavior examples? • Received daily positive academic and/or social acknowledgement? • Have 0-1 major office discipline referrals for year? • Have secondary/tertiary behavior intervention plans if >5 major office referrals?

  36. “TEAM” • Representative membership? • At least monthly meetings? • Active administrator participation? • Active & current action plan? • Designated coaching/facilitation support

  37. “DATA” • Measurable behavioral definitions for rule violations? • Discipline referral or behavior incident recording form that is efficient and relevant? • Clear steps for processing, storing, summarizing, analyzing, and reporting data? • Schedule for monthly review of school-wide data?

  38. Few positive SW expectations defined, taught, & encouraged

  39. Expectations & behavioral skills are taught & recognized in natural context

  40. Teaching Academics & Behaviors

  41. “ENCOURAGING/ ACKNOWLEDGING EXPECTATIONS” • Continuum or array of positive consequences? • At least daily opportunities to be acknowledged? • At least weekly feedback/acknowledgement?

  42. Acknowledge & Recognize

  43. Acknowledging SW Expectations: Rationale • To learn, humans require regular & frequent feedback on their actions • Humans experience frequent feedback from others, self, & environment • Planned/unplanned • Desirable/undesirable • W/o formal feedback to encourage desired behavior, other forms of feedback shape undesired behaviors

  44. “RULE VIOLATIONS” • Leveled definitions of problem behavior? • Procedures for responding to minor (nonrecordable) violations? • Procedures for responding to minor (non-office referable, recordable) violations? • Procedures for responding to major (office-referable) violations? • Procedures for preventing major violations? • Quarterly review of effectiveness of SW consequences for rule violations

  45. Characteristics of Safe School Center for Study & Prevention of Youth Violence • High academic expectations and performance; • High levels of parental and community involvement; • Effective leadership by administrators and teachers; • Few, but clearly understood and uniformly enforced, rules; • After school – extended day programs; and • Promotion of character education and good citizenship.

  46. Lessons Learned: White House Conference on School Safety • Students, staff, & community must have means of communicating that is immediate, safe, & reliable • Positive, respectful, predictable, & trusting student-teacher-family relationships are important • High rates of academic & social success are important • Positive, respectful, predictable, & trusting school environment/climate is important for all students • Metal detectors, surveillance cameras, & security guards are insufficient deterents

  47. Lessons Learned: White House Conference on School Safety Early Correlates/Indicators • Significant change in academic &/or social behavior patterns • Frequent, unresolved victimization • Extremely low rates of academic &/or social failures • Negative/threatening written &/or verbal messages

  48. “NONCLASSROOM SETTINGS” • Active supervision by all staff across all settings? • Daily positive student acknowledgements?

More Related