1 / 38

250-759 Social Responsibility of Business

250-759 Social Responsibility of Business. Prepared by W. L. Dougan. Chapter Five Marketing and Disclosure of Information. Ethical Theory and Business, 8 th Edition Tom L. Beauchamp & Norman E. Bowie. Overview. Marketing and Disclosure Advertising and Behavior Control  Arrington

Download Presentation

250-759 Social Responsibility of Business

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 250-759 Social Responsibility of Business Prepared by W. L. Dougan

  2. Chapter FiveMarketing and Disclosure of Information Ethical Theory and Business, 8th Edition Tom L. Beauchamp & Norman E. Bowie

  3. Overview • Marketing and Disclosure • Advertising and Behavior Control  Arrington • Information Disclosure in Sales  Holley • Marketing to Vulnerable Audiences  Brenkert • Legal Perspectives

  4. Ethics in Marketing • Types of misconduct • Withholding of information • Distortion of information • Bluffing (misrepresentation) • Due to information asymmetry (knowledge gap) • Leads to questions regarding the effects of trust by customer • Issues of autonomy • Issues of harm

  5. Considerations for Determining Misrepresentation • Sophistication of audience • Standard practices/expectations • Intention of informer

  6. Source: Mowen and Minor Deceptive Advertising • An advertisement which is potentially misleading or literally false is deceptive. • Potentially misleading ads are difficult to evaluate because miscomprehension may often occur. • Miscomprehension is a problem for firms because the audience does not understand the message being delivered. • The FTC regulates deceptive advertising, but not miscomprehension.

  7. Tom L. Beauchamp • Advertising should be persuasive, but should be judged to be morally inappropriate when it is manipulative • Three broad categories of influence: • Coercion - When one party deliberately and successfully uses force or a credible threat of unwanted, avoidable, and serious harm in order to compel a particular response from another person.

  8. Tom L. Beauchamp • Persuasion - A successful appeal to reason in order to convince a person to accept freely what is advocated. Does not involve use of deception. • Rational persuasion • Non-rational persuasion • Manipulation - The act of getting people to do what is advocated without resorting to coercion and without appealing to reasoned argument. Involves use of deception.

  9. Tom L. Beauchamp • Central issue of manipulation • How or through what psychological process a person responds to or is affected by an attempt at influence • NOT what is done as a result of influence

  10. Manipulation • BBA - Acceptable versus Unacceptable manipulation • Anheuser-Busch  false implications • Kellogg’s  false implications

  11. Continuum of free will • Persuasion • Manipulation • Coercion • Justified Manipulation • Unjustified Manipulation

  12. Michael J. Phillips • No sharp line between acceptable and unacceptable behavior • Manipulative advertising • Advertising that tries to favorably alter consumers’ perceptions of a product by appeals to factors other than physical attributes or functional performance • Deceptive advertising • False or misleading assertions or omissions that cause reasonable consumers to form erroneous judgments about the nature of a product.

  13. Michael J. Phillips • Associative advertising – Favorably influencing a consumer’s perception of a product by associating the product with a non-market good (e.g. sex, vigor, power, status, etc.) that the product ordinarily cannot supply on its own. One type of deceptive advertising.

  14. Robert L. Arrington • “Advertising and Behavior Control” • “Is advertising information or creation of desire?” • Considers whether or not advertising illegitimately interferes with consumer autonomy via manipulation. • The author argues that • generally it does not. • advertising seldom controls behavior or creates wants that are not rational or truly those of the consumer

  15. Robert Arrington • Puffery • Exaggerated, fanciful or suggestive claims • Some argue that the use of puffery constitutes manipulation • Autonomous Desire • We act autonomously when we act in a manner consistent with our second- order desires (which are desires regarding first-order desires). • Rational Desire and Choice • a) Based on knowledge of relevant information • Control or manipulation • Free Choice (Acting Freely) • a) We act freely when we do things for a reason

  16. Arrington • Four concepts • Autonomous desire • Rational Desire • Free choice • Control

  17. Manipulation • Intention • C intends P to act in a certain way A • Causality • C’s intention is causally effective in bring about A • Guaranteed Control of Outcome • C intends to ensure that all of the necessary conditions of A are satisfied

  18. Persuasive Advertising • Persuasive advertising typically does not undermine autonomy • Such persons act freely (on reasons) • Such persons act on reasons they take to be good ones • Such persons act on their second-order desires • Such persons are not manipulated

  19. David M. Holley • “Information Disclosure in Sales” • Obligations to disclose information on the part of a salesperson • Opposed to professions where service providers are obligated beyond their economic interests • Salesperson’s role is as an advocate, thus the salesperson has an obligation to present a favorable story

  20. Five levels of disclosure: • Minimal Information: Buyer is solely responsible • Modified Minimal Information: Disclose only what is necessary to avoid risk of injury • Fairness Rule: Safety information plus unavailable information • Mutual Benefit Rule: Safety information plus information needed for a “reasonable judgment” • Maximal Information Rule: all relevant information

  21. Defending the Mutual Benefit Rule • Mutual Benefit Rule allows the salesperson to meet his or her ethical obligations • Allows all parties to protect their obligations • Eliminates need to determine specific types of customers • Might be an exception where buyer indicates he/she is uninformed

  22. Vulnerability • Exception in the case of vulnerable customers • Also, salesperson can be vulnerable as well

  23. George G. Brenkert • “Marketing and the Vulnerable” • Some consumers lack “market competency” and such vulnerable individuals should not be targeted by marketers in ways that take advantage of their vulnerability

  24. Three objectives • Explore the notion of vulnerability • Design of marketing campaigns to protect vulnerabilities in some customers • Marketing programs which violate the previous directive or morally unjustified

  25. Vulnerability as a four place relation • Person (P) is vulnerable to another (moral or causal) agent (A) with respect to harm (H) in a particular context (C) • Distinct from susceptible • Distinct from disadvantaged (but may be overlapping) • Not generalized

  26. Vulnerable individuals • Operate with conditions or incapacities that impede their ability as normal market participants • Physical vulnerabilities • Cognitive vulnerabilities • Less able to protect their interests • Possess these vulnerabilities due to factors beyond their control • Often unaware of their vulnerabilities • Vulnerabilities render them susceptible to harm

  27. Source: Mowen and Minor Advertising to Children • Both policy makers and marketing managers have reacted to criticism of advertising directed at children. • Some countries have banned advertising to children under 12.

  28. Source: Mowen and Minor Telemarketing Fraud • The elderly are vulnerable to fraud by telemarketers. • A program to combat this fraud is the Know Fraud Program. • Organizations that fight telemarketing fraud are the AARP, the FBI, the Post Office, and others.

  29. Source: Mowen and Minor Negligent Consumer Behavior • Negligent behavior is composed of actions and inactions that may negatively affect the long-term quality of life of individuals and society. • This type of behavior can occur in two different contexts: • Product Misuse • Consumption of Hazardous Products

  30. Criteria for Determining Market Competency • The knowledge that one should shop around • Ability to determine differences in quality and the best price • Knowledge of legal rights • Knowledge of the products and their characteristics • Appropriate resource

  31. Morally justified market relations • Competition is free • Participants do so voluntarily • Competition is open • Deception or fraud are not used

  32. Morally justified market relations • Morally justified market relations require that all participants be capable of exhibiting market competency. • a) Individuals who are simply lazy should not count as vulnerable. • Not morally acceptable to market goods to especially vulnerable people with the intention of taking advantage of their vulnerability

  33. Vulnerabilities • Four types • Physically vulnerable • Cognitively vulnerable • Motivationally vulnerable • Socially vulnerable • Due to factors beyond their control • Render them susceptible to harm

  34. Implications • Does NOT mean don’t market to vulnerable • When condition is temporary, wait • May not use a campaign that exploits special vulnerabilities • May not rely on vulnerable to bring pressure to bear on non-vulnerable • May not depend on others to prevent vulnerability from causing harm

  35. Irving A. Backman v. Polaroid Corporation • Investors sued Polaroid for failing to disclose unfavorable information about their Polarvision product. • The court sided with Polaroid

  36. Sanfield, Inc. v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp. • A local jewelry company (Sanfield) sued a national chain (Fine) for deceptive marketing practices. • The practice in question concerns pretending to offer large discounts on jewelry.

  37. Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc. • Coke (maker of Minute Made orange juice) sued Tropicana for misleading television commercials. • The court sided with Coke.

  38. Kasky v. Nike, Inc. • Nike was accused of lying about its labor practices. • Nike argued that all statements about labor practices were protected political speech. • The court disagreed and argued that the speech was unprotected commercial speech for which Nike is accountable.

More Related