1 / 36

IDEM Update NIRPC EMPC January 8, 2009

IDEM Update NIRPC EMPC January 8, 2009. Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management. Question for EMPC. Can people with diverse interests work together to address environmental challenges? or

deon
Download Presentation

IDEM Update NIRPC EMPC January 8, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IDEM Update NIRPC EMPC January 8, 2009 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management

  2. Question for EMPC • Can people with diverse interests work together to address environmental challenges? or • Are the diverse interest groups destined to leave these issues unresolved until all legal avenues are exhausted—a lengthy process?

  3. US Courts Overturning Rules • 2007—Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (ICI) Boiler MACT—directly impacted about 10 sources with coal fired boilers • May 2008—Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) impacted all Power Plants • July 2008—Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) impacted all Power Plants and most Indiana air pollution strategies

  4. We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment BP Air Permit • 38 day public comment period, 342 written comments received • Public meeting and hearing – 1,200 attended, 44 commented • Construction permit issued May 1 and operation permit issued June 16 • Multiple appeals of these permit decisions to OEA, Federal Court and the EPA Administrator

  5. NRDC Statement on Tar Sands • “BP’s decision to tap into the Canadian wilderness is ‘based on addiction, not reality,’ says Ann Alexander, senior attorney at the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC), a nonprofit environmental group. ‘Tar sands crude oil is dirty from start to finish. It’s bad enough that [BP is] fouling our natural resources here in the Midwest, but it’s completely destroying them up in Canada. There are good sources of energy we can turn to that don’t involve turning entire forests into a moonscape.’”

  6. We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment Duke-Edwardsport Power Plant • First commercial Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant in the U.S. • 44 day public comment period • Public meeting and hearing – over 600 citizens attended • Construction permit issued January 25 and operation permit issued in March • Permit decision appealed

  7. Permit Backlog Reduction In 2005, there were 263 administratively extended NPDES permits Six of those 263 remain to be issued: US Steel Gary Works US Steel Midwest Division Arcelor Mittal Indiana Harbor East Arcelor Mittal Indiana Harbor West Arcelor Mittal Burns Harbor Hoosier Energy Merom Plant

  8. Impact of NPDES Extensions • These companies are not required to meet the Great Lakes Initiative discharge limits—e.g. mercury. • These companies are not required to meet other more stringent discharge limitations, testing and reporting requirements.

  9. Impact of NPDES Extensions • Many of the objections to the USX permit related to the time allowed by the permit for the Company to meet the new standards. • Without a renewed permit, USX has no deadline for meeting the new standards. • The other four steel plants with extended permits also have no deadline for meeting the new standards.

  10. IDEM’s Mission and Environmental Goal IDEM is responsible for protecting human health and the environment while providing for safe industrial, agricultural, commercial and governmental operation vital to a prosperous economy. Our goal is to increase the personal income of all Hoosiers to the national average while maintaining and improving Indiana’s Environmental Quality.

  11. Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index • Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy Yale University • Center For International Earth Science Information Network (CFIESIN) Columbia University • http://www.yale.edu/epi/

  12. We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment Performance Metrics Jan 2009

  13. We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment Performance Metrics June 2005

  14. We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment New Drinking Water Metric • Percent of Hoosiers Drinking Safe Water • Percentage of Indiana population that receives drinking water from facilities that are in full compliance with safe drinking water regulations • Federal (EPA) Goal is 90%

  15. We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment Total Permit Calendar Days

  16. Air Permits Branch Rapid Improvement Activities Lean/Kaizen Methodology to improve efficiency Significant Source Modifications (Construction Approvals) 9/07 Event Process time reduced from 220 days to 121 days avg. Permit Renewals 12/07 Event Process time reduced from 678 day avg. to all those issued in ’08 within 270 days allowed (calendar days) Eliminate backlog of administratively extended permits 1/1/08 - 156 permits 1/7/09 only 9 remaining

  17. HEA 1001 Property Tax Reform was the Major Issue in the 2008 Legislative Session SEA 45—The Great Lakes Water Compact with implementing legislation HEA 1120—Ban phosphates in residential dishwasher detergent sold after July 1, 2010 New 2008 Laws

  18. SEA 43 addresses many environmental issues Clarifies mercury switch removal program requirements to: Allow payment for removal of mercury containing anti-lock braking switches and other mercury containing devices Exempt wrecked vehicles where the mercury switch is not easily accessible Allows IDEM to accept electronic signatures Clarifies Requirements for Local Land Use Approvals for Solid Waste Landfills that have not yet accepted Waste New 2008 Laws

  19. SEA 43 Continued Removes the requirement that IDEM have a laboratory division Removes the requirement to display operator certificates at a treatment plant Allows a single vehicle ID and land application permit approval for a septage hauler Eliminates the requirement that IDEM obtain social security numbers as part of good character approval process Allows IDEM to use ELTF for tank inspections

  20. SEA 43 Continued Requires public notice of rules that are proposed to sunset Protects a community from being required to pay storm water fees to two entities Clarifies Environmental Criminal Language SEA 46 modified the marketable record title for real property to eliminate the need to renew a environmental restrictive covenant every 50 years New 2008 Laws

  21. Agency Accomplishments • All 1,269 tons of VX Agent stored at the Newport Chemical Agent Facility since 1969 has been safely destroyed. VX destruction started in May of 2005 and was completed in August 2008 • Digital Inspector Tool is in use for solid waste inspections including CAFOs, Auto Salvage Yards and Landfills.

  22. Agency Accomplishments • All IDEM lead CSO Communities have entered legal agreements to address their CSO issues. • Increased permit speed and virtually eliminated permit and enforcement backlogs. • Entire State met the 0.08 ppm Ozone air quality standard for the period 2006-2008, all but Lake and Porter Counties designated attainment. PM2.5 Air Quality looks good.

  23. Agency Initiatives • Virtual File Cabinet—electronic filing system—over 30,000,000 pages now available electronically. Visits to IDEM file room down over 90% from 445/mo 1Q 2007 to 35/mo 2Q 2008. • TEMPO—Enterprise wide electronic integration of all IDEM information—part of the process to allow us to receive and process electronic permit applications and reports. • Applied for EPA approval for electronic submittals

  24. Agency Initiatives • Returned enforcement function to the air, water and land programs and eliminated the separate office of enforcement. • Provide consistent Statewide air quality permitting, monitoring and enforcement services by directly managing the air program functions previously contracted to: Anderson, Evansville, Gary, Hammond, Indianapolis, and Vigo County.

  25. Office of Enforcement *2008 data is incomplete **Does not include Program Violation Letters

  26. Criminal Convictions • Wabash Environmental Technologies and Derrik Hagerman—Clean Water Act felonies. Sixty months of imprisonment and $237,000 in restitution (Terre Haute) • Miller Environmental and Anthony MuCullough—Clean Water Act felonies. Four months imprisonment and $510,000 in penalties (Shelbyville and Rushville)

  27. Criminal Convictions • Richard Reece—RCRA felonies. Six months in half way house, six months home detention and $60,000 restitution (Muncie) • Hassan Barrel and Alan Hersh—RCRA felonies. Awaiting sentencing (Fort Wayne)

  28. Reasons for Enforcement Change • No improvement in compliance rates in 4 years • EPA HQ told me both enforcement models (separate office or in program) are used effectively • Enforcement often told me cases could not move because they were “waiting on program staff” • Unpublished enforcement policies resulted in unexpected actions—too timid and too aggressive

  29. Forbes “America’s Greenest States” Report • “So who’s at the bottom? Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Indiana and, at No. 50, West Virginia. All suffer from a mix of toxic waste, lots of pollution and consumption and no clear plans to do anything about it. Expect them to remain that way.”

  30. Forbes Report Conclusion • Does not rank States based upon government verified environmental quality data • Appears to be a ranking based upon adherence of States to a group of policies advocated by the NGO’s providing information used in the rankings • The data used in the report is as old as 2003 and goes up to 2005 • We are implementing improvements and have made great progress

  31. We Protect Hoosiers and Our Environment Questions? Tom Easterly Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management 317-232-8611 teasterly@idem.in.gov

  32. Antidegradation Status • Stakeholder kickoff Meeting on March 7, 2008 • Discussed concepts and schedule at two large stakeholder meetings on 4/29 and 6/25 • Working group of twelve members from the environmental, business and municipal segments formed to come up with draft rule language and/or identify areas for IDEM to resolve

  33. Antidegradation Status • Working group has met on 7/15, 8/12, 9/16 , 10/30, 12/11/08 and 1/6/09, next is 1/26/09 • Working group agenda items: • Applicability (7/15) & (10/30) • Exemptions (8/12) & (10/30) • DeMinimis (9/16) & (10/30) • Water Quality Improvement Projects (1/26/09) • Antidegradation Demonstrations (12/11/08) • Public Notice/Public Comment (1/6/09)

More Related