210 likes | 318 Views
2013-2014. Why Family Engagement?. A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family and Community Connections on Student Achievement (Henderson & Mapp, 2002)
E N D
A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family and Community Connections on Student Achievement (Henderson & Mapp, 2002) • Reviewed hundreds of studies which overwhelmingly indicated that high quality family engagement programs improve and support student achievement. • The most effective teachers and schools are those with strong family engagement programs.
A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family and Community Connections on Student Achievement (Henderson & Mapp, 2002) • Students whose families are engaged in their education in some way • Earn higher grades and test scores • Are less likely to be retained a grade • Are more apt to have an accurate diagnosis for educational placement in classes • Attend school regularly • Like school and adapt well to it • Have better social skills • Have fewer negative behavior reports, and • Graduate and go on to postsecondary education.
Some Additional Research… • Parents are more likely to be involved in their child’s education if they trust their child’s teacher (Adams & Christenson, 2000) • When teachers reach out to families, the families are more likely to be involved in their child’s education in some way, resulting in strong, consistent gains in student performance in both reading and math (Westat & Policy Studies Associates, 2001)
Merriam Webster’s Dictionary defines… Involvementas “to enfold or envelop.” Engagement as “to interlock with; to mesh.” Do TO Do With
When schools involve parents they are leading with their institutional self-interest and desires. Thus, involvement implies doing to. When schools engageparents they are leading with the parents’ self-interests (their wants and dreams) in an effort to develop a genuine partnership. In contrast, engagement implies doing with.
Key Ideas • The need for a vision • Schools as community centers • School and family cultures • Barriers to partnerships • The role of technology • Evaluating current practice
May 2015 2014-15 May 2014 March 2014 Led by FAME Committee 2013-14 February 2014 2012-13 September 2013 Campus FAME Committee formed and meeting heldSeptember 30
Step 1 1 Awareness Training for All Understanding & Supporting the Value in Family 100% staff trained & Campus FAME Committee formed and meeting heldSeptember 30
Step 2 Self-Assessment Discover the Degree of Family Friendliness 2 Led by Campus FAME Committee February 2014
Step 3 3 Program Conceptualization and Development Policy Goal Action Development Setting Planning Led by Campus FAME Committee March 2014 *Includes presentation to SDC: recommended FAME action plan, campus PAC and policy..
Step 4 Program Implementation Phases Resources The 3 P’s 4 May 2014 – May 2015
Step 2 Evaluating and Sustaining Other Surveys Data Research May 2015 2
Even though research clearly proves that family engagement elevates the academic performance of children, there still exists a great chasm between what we know and what we do. Steven M. Constantino